Earlier today, gaming blog Kotaku reported on a rumored PlayStation 3 feature, set to be unveiled during next week's Game Developer's Conference. The key word, of course, is "rumored," a word which has since gotten the blog into hot water with Sony. The original article, which boasted one anonymous source, a smattering of founded speculation and repeated use of the aforementioned keyword, detailed "PlayStation Home," a visual mixture of the Xbox 360's achievement system and the Wii's customizable avatars. Though most rumors come and go with little input from publishers ("no comment" has become de rigueur), this one became notable as soon as Kotaku was asked to take it down. In a calm and straightforward follow-up article, Kotaku's Brian Crecente reveals that the blog's failure to comply has led to a complete dismissal and excommunication from Sony. It seems clear that such a response lends the rumor more veracity, but the response itself is far more interesting in what it means for the rest of the blogosphere.
What did Kotaku do wrong? In contacting Sony for comment on the initial story, Crecente was informed that publishing the report could harm the business relationship between the two entities. Unresponsive to thinly-veiled threats, Crecente published the story, citing concern with informing readers and not with maintaining a corporation's announcement schedule. In an e-mail to Crecente, David Karakker, senior director of Sony's corporate communications, stated that, "I am very disappointed that after trying to work with you as closely as possible and provide you and your team with access and information, you chose to report on this rumor.... I can't defend outlets that can't work cooperatively with us."
This doesn't appear to be an issue of cooperation at all. It's an issue of control. A major corporation is lashing out at a news platform where it is unable to pull all the strings and directly exert influence. In the ideal world of public relations, journalists would regurgitate press releases verbatim with nary a thought spared to truth or timing. All this comes just a week before GDC and Sony's promised meeting with bloggers -- the opening of a dialogue between "us" and "them."
By doing our job and informing readers, have we become the enemy?
[Update: Sony and Kotaku have settled their differences and reopened communications. As Brian Crecente puts it, "We were doing our job and Sony was doing theirs and now we can both continue to do so." Thanks AssemblyLineHuman.]













(Page 1) Reader Comments
Reply
Reply
Reply
Fuck im so angry atm.... just fucking die. I was your biggest supporter but now im just left with buyers remorse.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Sony should have embargoed this if its was a true story. I dont think this is exactly the type of story Kotaku should have been sticking its neck out on. I mean, its a RUMOR, not even a confirmed story. I think since most of sony's PR woes before the PS3 was released was due to unfounded rumors, they are going on the offensive, but this is overreacting and overreaching.
Well now, is Kotaku going to pull a Lik Sang and only post bad sony stories from now on? Would anything really change since it will mean that the get official news 2 or so minutes after everyone else? In the long term, this blacklisting wont matter. But Im going to avoid Kotaku for the time being, since im sure the last thing on their minds is to report on anything sony related.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Man. You guys totally shouldn't be reporting news and/or speculation about game companies. It's not like you people are freakin' JOURNALISTS.
Reply
Reply
"Nice way to stick it to the man. It's good you guys worked to find out if there was any truth to the rumor and it seems the reason they didn't want you to post this is because this may be the thing they will be announcing next week. Sony just made it worse for themselves to take one of the leading Gaming News Sites and take away something because they posted a possible true rumor and ruining their surprise. We don't see MS doing something like this or Nintendo they respect the press and you guys because you post things as rumor and not as truth."
Kotaku is a great site as is Joystiq, you guys should not be told what to do. They posted it as a rumor and that is different than saying it is truth. Just cause they are spoiling a surprise doesn't mean you be a bunch of babies and do that to a site that has been grateful to you.
Reply
So say if Joystiq came across a story that said that 40% of X360s are faulty and they had credible sources and Microsoft warned them twice to take down the story or else have their relationship with MS severed, that'd be totally cool with you? Couldn't any company just warn someone twice to take down a negative story and be "justified?"
Reply
Reply
Is this hurting someone? No...if anything, it's causing PS3 owners to become excited about GDC.
Does it seem to anyone else that Sony is intentionally killing and doing away with anything that might result in decent press/publicity for them?
Reply
Take down your lame comments. No? But i told you to. I'm just not seeing the argument here.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Now you gonna cry that is my fault. Perfect.. absolutely perfect.
Reply
All of that aside...this feature wouldn't be half bad, once you get by the fact that (once again) Sony has stolen ideas from Nintendo and Microsoft.
Reply
On Kotaku and Joystiq, rumors mix with reviews, news, randomn vg culture, etc.. and they look the same.
To me this isn't so much a lesson about ethical journalism, as it is an unveiling of the dance that PR people and entertainment people do. Reporting on gossip is entertainment not news.
I still find all of this hilarious, and am kind of glad Brian and Kotaku did what they did. But they had warning and have now lost access.
Reply
Seriously, if anyone could use a big satisfying announcement without a hitch right now, it's Sony.
(Karma I guess)
Reply
Reply
Im not saying either is wrong here, they both acted questionably. Although you could say this is a first ammendment issue, its also about good journalism. Sticking your neck out to post a RUMOR, that could very well be proven false in a couple of weeks, is just dumb. What if the rumor was the one a few months back that the 20gb ps3 couldnt use wireless controllers (the one that gamesradar posted and spread like wildfire)?
Reply
Reply
i'm not even gonna bother. say something that's not retarded next time.
@13
if it's unconfirmed, yes they have every right to do so. does anyone here even know how the press works? this isn't some dork on myspace, this is a mainstream blog with lost of visitors.
if someone tell you to remove a rumor, you do it, i don't care how much you don't like it.
Reply
Reply
Reply
So anyway, Sony performs more suckage, and gives me even less of a reason to ever give them my money. Really, what are they trying to cover up? The only thing I can think of is that the rumor is in fact false, but because everyone would get so hyped about the rumor, when the real announcement is made at GDC and it turns out to be much less than what the rumor said, Sony would get further bad press and a worse public opinion. Of course, attacking a blog reporting a rumor basically does the same thing.
Sony really is a f***ed up company.
Reply
http://alinktothefuture.com/2007/03/01/thank-you-kotaku-and-a-call-to-blackball-sony/
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Call it a hunch but I think Kotaku will be just fine, and I hope more bloggers and video game journalists follow their lead.
Reply
Reply
You're a little off by saying that it's not so on Joystiq and Kotaku. Sure, it's not put into a specific place, but very rarely are they not tagged with the word 'Rumor' in front of them. This article is no different.
Reply
Reply
I'm not taking this personally. This was a business decision on their part and while I don't agree with it, I understand it.
The fact that they are now blackballing me doesn't change the fact that I love God of War II and am working on a glowing review about it or that I think Motorstorm is a fantastic PS3 title.
And the point isn't about whether this was a story worth fighting over, the point was whether I should allow a company to dictate what a blog posts or doesn't post.
Thanks for the story Ludwig.
Brian
Reply
They didn't get the info from Sony. They asked Sony if said info was true or not and they got hit with a "Don't post that or we'll cut ties with you."
That's not what you're thinking of. Sony didn't give them the story and asked them to be quite.
Reply
Reply
Punch yourself in the balls.
Punch yourself in the balls.
There, I've told you twice, now do it. Though traditionally it's three times.
Reply
It's called freedom of the press, you muppets.
As has been said many times now, there were no NDA's, nothing. This was just a rumour, and Kotaku had every right to publish it. Just because Sony didn't want them to, does not mean that they shouldn't have. They were fully aware that Sony wouldn't react well, and they didn't.
The point here is, Sony don't have the right to control the press on rumours, especially ones that involve no NDAs.
Reply
Reply
Reply
There is NOTHING. WHAT. SO. EVER. to stop people reporting on rumours, conjecture, or leaks. ITS PART OF THE ENTIRE POINT OF THE PRESS.
sony cannot be defended here.
Reply
Reply
Reply