Sony blackballs Kotaku for rumor report [update 1]
Earlier today, gaming blog Kotaku reported on a rumored PlayStation 3 feature, set to be unveiled during next week's Game Developer's Conference. The key word, of course, is "rumored," a word which has since gotten the blog into hot water with Sony. The original article, which boasted one anonymous source, a smattering of founded speculation and repeated use of the aforementioned keyword, detailed "PlayStation Home," a visual mixture of the Xbox 360's achievement system and the Wii's customizable avatars. Though most rumors come and go with little input from publishers ("no comment" has become de rigueur), this one became notable as soon as Kotaku was asked to take it down. In a calm and straightforward follow-up article, Kotaku's Brian Crecente reveals that the blog's failure to comply has led to a complete dismissal and excommunication from Sony. It seems clear that such a response lends the rumor more veracity, but the response itself is far more interesting in what it means for the rest of the blogosphere.
What did Kotaku do wrong? In contacting Sony for comment on the initial story, Crecente was informed that publishing the report could harm the business relationship between the two entities. Unresponsive to thinly-veiled threats, Crecente published the story, citing concern with informing readers and not with maintaining a corporation's announcement schedule. In an e-mail to Crecente, David Karakker, senior director of Sony's corporate communications, stated that, "I am very disappointed that after trying to work with you as closely as possible and provide you and your team with access and information, you chose to report on this rumor.... I can't defend outlets that can't work cooperatively with us."
This doesn't appear to be an issue of cooperation at all. It's an issue of control. A major corporation is lashing out at a news platform where it is unable to pull all the strings and directly exert influence. In the ideal world of public relations, journalists would regurgitate press releases verbatim with nary a thought spared to truth or timing. All this comes just a week before GDC and Sony's promised meeting with bloggers -- the opening of a dialogue between "us" and "them."
By doing our job and informing readers, have we become the enemy?
[Update: Sony and Kotaku have settled their differences and reopened communications. As Brian Crecente puts it, "We were doing our job and Sony was doing theirs and now we can both continue to do so." Thanks AssemblyLineHuman.]











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Screwed @ Mar 1st 2007 6:16PM
are you afraid too, joystiq?
Game Artist @ Mar 1st 2007 6:18PM
Sad, sad, sad. Hope Sony gets a black eye for this one.
Screwed @ Mar 1st 2007 6:18PM
Btw dont speak of journalism intergrity, you guys have none. Journalist will get their ass sued for spreading false, rumors, you guys getting away with it because you are just a mere blog site. Deal with it
Patrick @ Mar 1st 2007 6:20PM
Sheesh, honestly what the fuck is wrong with these Sony guys. How much longer can Sony continue pissing so many people off and not give a damm.
Fuck im so angry atm.... just fucking die. I was your biggest supporter but now im just left with buyers remorse.
Engineer_This @ Mar 1st 2007 6:20PM
If you or Chris or one of the other bloggers are going to that meeting at GDC, please inquire about their decision to blackball Kotaku. I think it's important for that to be put on the table during that session. Maybe enough negative press about this will lead to Sony correcting itself.
deaftly @ Mar 1st 2007 7:09PM
sony can go to hell, not just for the kotaku thing but yet again ripping off more features from the other guys. uncreative bastards
mr_nihilism @ Mar 6th 2007 7:31PM
Sony becomes more impressive with each passing day.
duzzyman @ Mar 1st 2007 7:05PM
after reading that article at kotaku about tne minutes ago my opinion of them went way up. as long as gaming news sites are willing to stand up and not let sony's coperate bully tell them what they can or cannot right i will be happy. i hope sony reads the storys comments at kotaku i hope they know how bad that they screwed up.
Avinash_Tyagi @ Mar 1st 2007 6:22PM
Sony is like the regime about to be toppled, trying to maintain its grasp on power
Animus @ Mar 1st 2007 6:22PM
Wow. I'd understand if Sony gave the scoop directly to Kotaku and told them not to talk about it, but it was nothing like that. It's not like Kotaku was breaking NDA, Kotaku simply asked Sony about a rumor from another source, and then BAM, they're cut off.
Brandon @ Mar 1st 2007 6:22PM
Angry Much? But anyway...
Sony should have embargoed this if its was a true story. I dont think this is exactly the type of story Kotaku should have been sticking its neck out on. I mean, its a RUMOR, not even a confirmed story. I think since most of sony's PR woes before the PS3 was released was due to unfounded rumors, they are going on the offensive, but this is overreacting and overreaching.
Well now, is Kotaku going to pull a Lik Sang and only post bad sony stories from now on? Would anything really change since it will mean that the get official news 2 or so minutes after everyone else? In the long term, this blacklisting wont matter. But Im going to avoid Kotaku for the time being, since im sure the last thing on their minds is to report on anything sony related.
mushiking @ Mar 1st 2007 6:23PM
i reiterate... THEY WERE WARNED TWICE to take it down. how are they not at fault here? if someone tells you to take something down, you do it. i'm just not seeing the argument here.
Tadioku @ Mar 1st 2007 6:25PM
they deserve it Sony worked so close with them and invite them to every event they had and they almost NEVER published anything good about the company the place turned into a OH THE WII IS F-ING GREAT GO BUY THAT RIGHT NOW OR YOU CAN'T BE HERE I hate those guys and I'm really happy for what sony did
Sensai @ Mar 1st 2007 6:24PM
Yay. Another huge corporation trying to shut up the little guys.
Man. You guys totally shouldn't be reporting news and/or speculation about game companies. It's not like you people are freakin' JOURNALISTS.
Tristan @ Mar 1st 2007 6:26PM
I posted this on Kotaku when I heard this:
"Nice way to stick it to the man. It's good you guys worked to find out if there was any truth to the rumor and it seems the reason they didn't want you to post this is because this may be the thing they will be announcing next week. Sony just made it worse for themselves to take one of the leading Gaming News Sites and take away something because they posted a possible true rumor and ruining their surprise. We don't see MS doing something like this or Nintendo they respect the press and you guys because you post things as rumor and not as truth."
Kotaku is a great site as is Joystiq, you guys should not be told what to do. They posted it as a rumor and that is different than saying it is truth. Just cause they are spoiling a surprise doesn't mean you be a bunch of babies and do that to a site that has been grateful to you.
Jess @ Mar 1st 2007 6:43PM
I don't think kotaku does sony any favours by spinning news and feeding the trolls.
ozz.net @ Mar 1st 2007 6:26PM
"i reiterate... THEY WERE WARNED TWICE to take it down. how are they not at fault here? if someone tells you to take something down, you do it. i'm just not seeing the argument here."
So say if Joystiq came across a story that said that 40% of X360s are faulty and they had credible sources and Microsoft warned them twice to take down the story or else have their relationship with MS severed, that'd be totally cool with you? Couldn't any company just warn someone twice to take down a negative story and be "justified?"
Pixelantes Anonymous @ Mar 1st 2007 6:26PM
mushiking, your mom's asking you to take your post down, it's too stupid to be displayed public, mm-kay?
Sensai @ Mar 1st 2007 6:26PM
mushiking: What the hell are you talking about? It's freedom of press, mate. You can put up whatever you like so long as it's not hurting someone.
Is this hurting someone? No...if anything, it's causing PS3 owners to become excited about GDC.
Does it seem to anyone else that Sony is intentionally killing and doing away with anything that might result in decent press/publicity for them?
pandlcg @ Mar 1st 2007 6:27PM
@ mushiking,
Take down your lame comments. No? But i told you to. I'm just not seeing the argument here.
ciaran.lamphier @ Mar 2nd 2007 2:08AM
I love how because it's Sony, it's a freedom of speech issue, but if Apple do this kind of thing we make an excpetion because well, their keynotes or more entertaining and besides we have a grude against Sony Execs.
In the days leading up to an expo, companies in Sony's position need to make an impression - last minute half leaks like Kotaku's can ruin that, and it's understandable Sony might want to lean on them to prevent it.
That doesn't mean Sony wants to be Big Brother, that means Sony wan'ts to have a go at surprising it's fans once in a while. Chillaz joystiq.
Brandon @ Mar 1st 2007 6:27PM
And another thing, Companies tell blogs to take down stories ALL THE TIME, for various reasons (including spoiling announcements). And more often than not, the sites oblige, with no problem. Its not bad journalism to do that, its cooperation, Companies want to announce things when they are ready, and sometimes stories undermine their efforts. I think it may have something to do with the blogosphere not being keen on sony right now that kotaku decided it could get away with not doing the normal thing.
Aaron Harden @ Mar 2nd 2007 10:46AM
Wow, Kotaku is now screwed just to get the scoop on upcoming news. I don't blame Sony in anyway though, they have been working on this for awhile and I wouldn't want people to know. But i hope this rumor is right! Kotaku was pretty close to Sony, too bad.
Adam Sutherland @ Mar 1st 2007 6:27PM
I think if a different dialogue had been opened other than the initial threats, the bloggers would have considered acting differently. Sony could have easily asked in a friendly matter but chose to push Kotaku around instead. Kudos to them for not backing down to a threat.
Intentless @ Mar 1st 2007 6:27PM
Not only did sony deny it they shot the messenger... that says... its true or at least mostly true if it wasn't they would leave it alone. And how much foot do they have left to shoot by the way...
crecente @ Mar 1st 2007 6:42PM
As I said in both the post about the blackballing and in my letter to Sony, this will not impact the way we report on Sony, just the way they respond to us.
I'm not taking this personally. This was a business decision on their part and while I don't agree with it, I understand it.
The fact that they are now blackballing me doesn't change the fact that I love God of War II and am working on a glowing review about it or that I think Motorstorm is a fantastic PS3 title.
And the point isn't about whether this was a story worth fighting over, the point was whether I should allow a company to dictate what a blog posts or doesn't post.
Thanks for the story Ludwig.
Brian
CJC @ Mar 1st 2007 6:27PM
Geeze, Sony. WHY do you do it? Leaked info about an interesting feature could only lead to hype, which can only be GOOD. All of that other good news earlier today, and then THIS. Please, stop shooting yourself in the foot.
Screwed @ Mar 1st 2007 6:28PM
This is not same as lik-sang, you want exclusive information from me and you choose not to cooperate, you would be happy i dont sue you, i just dont invite u to my party.
Now you gonna cry that is my fault. Perfect.. absolutely perfect.
Sascha23 @ Mar 1st 2007 6:47PM
I have to defend Sony on this one. These issues are critical pieces to the marketing puzzle. Companies want to release these 'officially' via a Press Release or through a bonafide channel. There are several reasons for this, including investors, consumers and ensuring valid information is being released out there. Gamers just keep ranting like Microsoft and Sony should just 'be chill' or 'stop being so stuck up'. Even though this is a gaming industry, the business of it is a serious matter.
Louis S. @ Mar 1st 2007 6:42PM
Screwed,
They didn't get the info from Sony. They asked Sony if said info was true or not and they got hit with a "Don't post that or we'll cut ties with you."
That's not what you're thinking of. Sony didn't give them the story and asked them to be quite.
Sensai @ Mar 1st 2007 6:32PM
Sony is just not playing any of their cards right...they were dealt Aces, and traded them for a pair of sixes.
All of that aside...this feature wouldn't be half bad, once you get by the fact that (once again) Sony has stolen ideas from Nintendo and Microsoft.
Nerdtacular @ Mar 1st 2007 6:33PM
It was a rumor. In TV news or printed news, gossip is put in a different place with a different look.
On Kotaku and Joystiq, rumors mix with reviews, news, randomn vg culture, etc.. and they look the same.
To me this isn't so much a lesson about ethical journalism, as it is an unveiling of the dance that PR people and entertainment people do. Reporting on gossip is entertainment not news.
I still find all of this hilarious, and am kind of glad Brian and Kotaku did what they did. But they had warning and have now lost access.
sine909 @ Mar 1st 2007 6:34PM
What exactly separates sites like Kotaku (and Joystiq for that matter) from good ol' Paparazzi? I personally have no problem with Sony wanting to protect their announcements, which they're obviously extremely heavily invested in, with specific plans for how the can get the most out of them. Think about what these announcements do for a company like Apple - it's really no different.
Seriously, if anyone could use a big satisfying announcement without a hitch right now, it's Sony.
(Karma I guess)
jonn @ Mar 1st 2007 7:02PM
@Mushiking,
you are either a moron, or living in Cuba, or some other communist country. Obviously fanboyism is blind. This is just more bad Sony press. They deserve all this bad press with their arrogance, and hypocriticism.
AssemblyLineHuman @ Mar 1st 2007 6:34PM
Sensai: It's not really a freedom of the press issue so much as it is an ethical issue because Sony is an entity with its own rights, and it can choose to snub anyone it wants who makes a decision they disagree with. Personally, I think Kotaku is in the right by posting the story, and I'm hoping the repercussions in the form of bad press is enough for Sony to realize that trying to control the gaming news is not a good idea.
Raynre @ Mar 1st 2007 6:36PM
This was a rumor. A RUMOR. Not news. Not a press release. There were no NDAs. Kotaku had every right to print this, and they never once stepped over the line by saying "This WILL happen." They merely put their heads together and studied the clues, coming up with a perfectly sound and reasonable answer. The fact that Sony denies it so rigerously just means that the news gets out that much faster, because now every major blog site is reporting on the story.
o.o @ Mar 1st 2007 6:35PM
Tabloid (rumors) does not equal to News (proven facts_
Brandon @ Mar 1st 2007 6:35PM
I'm not saying its the same as lik sang, im saying I hope kotaku doesnt pull a lik sang and pretty much complain and blame sony for all their problems, even though they were well aware of the consequences. Sony did initially politely ask them to pull the story. Probably due to it being true, and would spoil a future GDC announcement.
Im not saying either is wrong here, they both acted questionably. Although you could say this is a first ammendment issue, its also about good journalism. Sticking your neck out to post a RUMOR, that could very well be proven false in a couple of weeks, is just dumb. What if the rumor was the one a few months back that the 20gb ps3 couldnt use wireless controllers (the one that gamesradar posted and spread like wildfire)?
Stan @ Mar 1st 2007 6:35PM
it was a rumour of course, but they had been asked NOT TO publish it. If a friend told you a secret and asked you not to tell someone, and then you blabbed it, your friend would be pissed, and rightly so. Sony obviously didnt want this particular story leaked and they nicely asked them not to publish it, which they ignored and paid the price.
mushiking @ Mar 1st 2007 6:35PM
@16
i'm not even gonna bother. say something that's not retarded next time.
@13
if it's unconfirmed, yes they have every right to do so. does anyone here even know how the press works? this isn't some dork on myspace, this is a mainstream blog with lost of visitors.
if someone tell you to remove a rumor, you do it, i don't care how much you don't like it.
Chocolate Starfish @ Mar 2nd 2007 9:15AM
The biggest problem here is the precedent it sets. Whether this rumor was juicy enough to warrant the battle or not isn't the debate.
The problem is that readers like myself come to these sites to catch up on gossip. Much like people read the grocery store tabloids to catch up on questionable "facts" about celebrities, I read video game blogs to fill my mind with rumors about video games.
Journalistic integrity isn't in question here. Kotaku labeled the article as a rumor. If Sony is going to maliciously cut off blogs for posting rumors, there will be nothing left to post but copies of Sunday's Best Buy flier. You and I will have nothing to slash our productivity at work, the fanboys will have nothing to argue about, blogs as we know them will come to a grinding halt.
The beauty of blogs is that they are held to a lower standard than print media. It is expected that they will be filled with opinion and speculation. I don't want that to change. Sony does. Sony has drawn my ire.
tmmoore_nc @ Mar 1st 2007 7:24PM
Kotaku was right for doing this. They were not under any obligation to withold this information, and Sony didn't even try to compromise, which usually happens in business.
Kotaku had a responsibility to post the RUMOR, and by backlashing against Kotaku, Sony has proven this rumor has legs, and the legs are meaty. I hope the blogging community stands up for Kotaku, because if a major gaming news site posted this (Like IGN or Gamespot), there would be no reprecussions here.
Joshua @ Mar 1st 2007 6:37PM
Screwed (#21), could you translate your post into something more like English? Thanks.
So anyway, Sony performs more suckage, and gives me even less of a reason to ever give them my money. Really, what are they trying to cover up? The only thing I can think of is that the rumor is in fact false, but because everyone would get so hyped about the rumor, when the real announcement is made at GDC and it turns out to be much less than what the rumor said, Sony would get further bad press and a worse public opinion. Of course, attacking a blog reporting a rumor basically does the same thing.
Sony really is a f***ed up company.
Leshrac @ Mar 1st 2007 6:37PM
I have just sent Joystiq a comment about this, but Joystiq, and the rest of the gaming community, should blackball Sony right back... this is absolutely ridiculous.
http://alinktothefuture.com/2007/03/01/thank-you-kotaku-and-a-call-to-blackball-sony/
AssemblyLineHuman @ Mar 1st 2007 6:38PM
No one's getting sued because *no one did anything illegal*.
Hellsing @ Mar 1st 2007 6:39PM
Bloggers should not stand for this kind of bullying and intimidation. You don't get your pay checks from Sony, Microsoft, or Nintendo so why should you bow down to their every whim? Kotaku is in the right on this one, and Sony is so very very wrong. Sony does not have control over the media and will never have control over it. It's up to the journalists to get us information accurately and quickly. It doesn't matter if someone doesn't want it run.
annon @ Mar 1st 2007 6:40PM
KOTAKU WAS AN AFFILIATED BLOG/NEWS SITE WITH SONY AND IS ENTITLED TO BENEFITS LIKE DEBUG UNIT, SPECIAL ACCESSES TO STUFF ETC, BUT THEY HAVE TO FOLLOW STRICT ORDERS FROM SONY, SO IN FACT HE WAS TREATING HIS BLOG AS A REAL BLOG WHEN IT WAS A SONY "CHANNEL" BLOG. SINCE HE DIDNT FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS HE NO LONGER GET SEMI OFFICIAL ACCESSES SO IN ESSENCE HES JUST A NORMAL BLOG NOW HE DOESN'T GET THE EXCLUSIVE CRAP ANYMORE. HE BROKE THE RULES SO HE DOESNT GET THE BENEFITS ANYMORE. so hopefully you guys understand now....
AssemblyLineHuman @ Mar 1st 2007 6:40PM
Stan: The difference is that Kotaku and Sony aren't friends, nor should they be. That sort of relationship between game companies and the game press would be entirely inappropriate. Sort of like Fox News and the White House.
David @ Mar 1st 2007 6:41PM
Actually, one of the bigger complaints about why video game journalism doesn't get very much credit is -because- of how closely tied to the gaming companies they are. Want exclusive info? Wax poetically about a horrendous game and make the piece of filth seem less...filthy. Sony says they weren't cooperating. Cooperating means two parties reach an understanding. What Sony actually meant was, "They didn't do what we told them, waaaaaaaa, waaaaaaaa, you can't come play with me anymore."
Call it a hunch but I think Kotaku will be just fine, and I hope more bloggers and video game journalists follow their lead.
Stevie @ Mar 1st 2007 6:41PM
I really think everyone should stand up for Kotaku at this point. Sony is once again alienating its own (former?) core fans.