AP ignores Paris, who should we ignore?

Thompson is dangerous, Paris is annoying and utterly useless, that's the difference.

Blackout people like Mark Rein who continuously spout bullshit just to get everyone riled up.

Uwe Boll!

I say ignore Sony, just in time for GDC.

Thomson doesn't seem dangerous to me. He hasn't stopped a single game from being made. The truth is he is a wannabe celeb. So yeah, a blackout would be totally appropriate.

If we ignore Jackey Poo he'll go away.

paris, what the hell is so important about her, shes not even an actor or anything shes just a rich sl*t

At this point, anyone who has Tretton or Harrison in their names. Bring back the good Sony PR of old.

Also, anyone from Nintendo that ISN'T Miyamoto or Reggie.

ALSO.... EA games. And ALL of Ubisoft's port-outings.

Thompson is probably less dangerous than Paris Hilton... I'd say ignore Thompson, also ignore sales numbers, as they are completely useless to gamers too, and usually inaccurate and inconsequential.

All of this talk is masking the truly important news stories... namely those about Anna Nicole Smith.

Nintendo's Perrin Kaplan. This woman doesn't know anything and even knows less about videogames or Nintendo.

Yes, Uwe! He thrives on negative publicity. Quit feeding the beast!

Phil Harrison, without question.

The man is a real-life internet forum troll.

I do think that there's a difference between ignoring Paris and Jack. Paris' entire celebrity is based on celebrity alone. Thus, if you ignore her celebrity, she's no longer a celebrity. If you ignore Jack, however, he's still a lawyer. At the very least, he can still go into a courtroom and try to get a result, even if no one reports on it.

God yes, SONY (again, to echo Arno, just in time for GDC).

Also, EA. While making the gaming public aware of their antics related to the nickel-and-diming they perform more severely with each new game seems important to chronicle, perhaps every other news bit about them can just happen to get lost in the shuffle?

The difference is that if the gaming press (which mainly reports on Jack to ridicule his pointless crusades and his many failures) stops reporting on him, it doesn't stop the blinkered press and his cronies from reporting on him. I'd rather that we continue to laugh at Jack and provide that balance than not.

Doug Lowenstein incorrectly asserts we're feeding his fire - something that he clearly doesn't need. If going by his tragic emails tells us anything, he'd be more than happy not to have the gaming press making him constantly look like a fool.

Sony... and you'd be doing them a favor.

I think it would just be a nice touch to boycott that bitch. I personally wouldn't miss it if the AP would stop reporting Paris Hilton crap. I really don't give two turds about that over rated coke headed slut bag.I don't know why everyone sweats her. So what is she has money. She still has no tits. And fake tits wouldn't help much either. On top of that shes a used up banged out piece of twat skin. Bravo AP... Bravo.

Jack Thompson is a different story. Giving him attention just exposes him for what he is. Jack is a lunatic with completely unjustified (and scientifically proven against) views that encompass all gamers as having psychotic tendencies. He may be a media whore but its all bad for Jack. Paris on the other hand needs to be forgotten about. Its not like she betters any one but her own life. She is a useless coke slut. Bang her in the butt for coke indeed.

Anyone that thinks a Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft or any other game dev company rep or the company as a whole should be ignored by the gaming press is a dipshit.

How about ignoring the rumormongers for a while. I get sick and tired of seeing ridiculous rumors spread all over the internet just because one site decides to run it and then all the relinkers (like JoyStiq, I do like the site but the majority of your content still seems to be coming from other sites) think they have to run it also. With GDC coming up these rumors are going to start flying like crazy and it would be nice to go without them for a change.

while theyre at it could they put a stop on jade goody? That obnoxious woman is all over every newspaper every day, im sick of seeing her bloated pg face

Oh.... just one more person I'd like to see get banned. Could we please get rid of Nancy Grace? Does she really help anyone with her ranting and bull crap? I don't think she has helped one case that she has stuck her nose in. Every time I see her she is drawing some cacamaeme idea of whats going on and he has no idea what shes talking about.

Maybe we should do Bush a favor also and just ban him too. Its not like he is making anything better at this point. The whole Bush Admin needs to be muzzled.

Why don't we ignore the commentors?

any game involving barbie or the olsen twins...
oh wait, we already do that.
PHEW!

Instead of complaining about how the world is so full of shit and retards like BOOTSIELON, I've decided to change the perspective of the whole situation.

Taking a topic that makes you all hateful inside and turning it inside out!

Teh Fanbot 4aXXorZ Joystiq!

http://sites.gizoogle.com/index2.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.joystiq.com%2F2007%2F03%2F03%2Fap-ignores-paris-who-should-we-ignore%2F%23comments

Anyways, ignoring the problem is NEVER the solution. A couple days ago I read an article that name Paris Hilton one of the 10 worst women capable of being a female 'role model' simply from her huge celebrity and media exposure. I'd rather see media criticizing her than try to ignore that nothing's happened.

Not acknowledging the critical faults kind of destroys the reason for ignoring them in the first place.

The problem, and danger, of ignoring jacky is that he's well and truly the Jerry Fawell of the gaming industry. The man has no clues, no idea about how things are or what these stats he's quoting even means, and he's constantly attacking and industry he doesn't understand.

If our side was to completely ignore him. His side and his followers (and yes, there are many and some even have power) would be allowed to run completely unfettered. There would be no one offering counterpoints when the games go to trial. There would be no studies being offered up in defense of the game industry. And what is the link? The killers played video games. In todays culture, that's roughly the same as saying "since all school shootings happen at school, let's ban schools."

But on the other side, each time he hits the news, the retards go flocking to death threats, screaming, and ultimately offering credence to his cause. As outrageous as he is, most of the time, the people he faces in the public arena have nothing more to say than "I play video games and I should fucking kill you for trying to take them away." This is partially the games industries fault as well. My point is summed up in the following video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yREGBKZggwA

They take Jack Thompson against Adam Sessler. Now Adam Sessler has always been a fucking clown shoe, period. But during the debate, Jack Thompson seems prepared, Adam merely fumbles with opinions.

One of the first things to use against jackie during this debate was the Padukah case. He, along with David Grossman, claimed that Carneal trained exclusively on Doom. Which is false. Carneal was not only a paranoid schitzophrenic but had trained with the gun he stole for the shooting. yes, you read that right. A troubled youth with a hatred for his fellow students, and a local adult decides to teach him how to long range shoot to better relieve stress. And how exactly did Padukah happen? Oh yes, long range sniping fire into a prayer group. From someone who was bullied and bruised everyday because he was an open atheist. Yeppers, Doom pulled that shit.

But then he mentions one study. A study that, should Sessler have recognized is the same study Thompson has been quoting for years, shows the increased violence due to video games directly relates to children who are bullied, neglected, abused by parents, and all fit the profile that we associate with future criminals. But no, yet another opportunity missed.

And then Jacki-O mentions the "changes" (the original hypelines included the ability to fight back against children and teachers) made to Bully as a bad thing. Adam could have just as easily pushed that point and said, "Doesn't the changes made to Bully indicate Rockstar's ability to recognize a line crossed and willingness to listen to a concerned community?"

Instead, sessler jumps off the deep end, not attacking JTs sources or points but instead uses blanketing statements. The gaming press rarely throws anyone at JT willing to slam down points with facts but instead, each time a Sessler takes down Thompson, gamers applaud like "Yeah, fucking take him down!" All Sessler managed to achieve in this debate is prove a hardcore gamers amazing inability to research before a debate. But hell, looking at the comments, you can't tell just how badly Sessler failed.

Ignore Jack Tretton and Phil Harrison (Sony execs...) Idiots, the both of them.

Sony. It would be the perfect response to their 'blackballing' Kotaku.

Peter "the troll" Moore

Bill Gates

I agree with you all about not wanting to blackout Wacko Jacko. In fact, doesn't his tactics remind you of a certain Senator McCarthy? The one who went ballistic trying to find communists in our country?

Back then, President Eisenhower simply let McCarthy do as he pleased because [A] he didn't want to rile up his own party and, more importantly, [B] he believed the man's own frenzy would make the man do himself in.

Wacko Jacko is just that kind of guy. It seems that he gets more frenzied and fanatical in his one-man "crusade" against video game violence. The more of his own flaming crap his associates get to see courtesy of the gaming press, the more likely his associates are going to alienate him, and what will happen to him then? Let's leave things as they are with him right now; sooner or later he's going to be shut down by his own fanaticism, and not even his own buddies will want to pay him any attention anymore. That will be a sweeter revenge than anything I can hope to cook up.

Joystiq should quit reporting on every single analysts' take on the console wars.

@33 You have exactly the right idea.

That question is easy to answer...Sony. After the crap they pulled with some other gaming blogs the other day and the craptastic effort they've been putting forth lately, ignoring Sony would only make things better!

a rich slut is VERY important.. noob

The best thing Sony could hope for is if the press started to ignore guys like Harrison or Krazy Kaz. It seems to me that the resentment amongst the hardcore crowd towards Sony is finally trickling down to the general consumers, going by a few conversations i've had recently.

Oh, also - mAnn Coulter, just in general.

Nah, we shouldn't ignore Sony reps, it's too much fun seeing them shove their feet in their mouth.

"Let's leave things as they are with him right now; sooner or later he's going to be shut down by his own fanaticism, and not even his own buddies will want to pay him any attention anymore. That will be a sweeter revenge than anything I can hope to cook up."

Well here's the problem. When Jackie-O self destructs, who will take his place? Imagine a competant Jack Thompson....

I agree with Bootsielon, you shouldn't ignore anything that could possibly have an impact on gamers (except Perrin Kaplin, because everything she says winds up being false anyway)

Paris Hilton makes sense to ignore, becuase unless she starts, you know, doing something with her life, then nothing she does will effect anyone except desperate pre-teen girls

Uwe Boll is a good candidate, as is anything Cliffy B says that doesn't regard GoW

I would love to believe that a competent version of Jack Thompson would embrace the industry and worth with it to give games a better public perception.

*replace worth with work

Jack Tretton. He hasn't said anything that matters to me as a gamer anyway.

I find the commentors that say Sony completely hilarious. These are the same commentors who bitch about everything Sony says? You know, you are completely free to ignore Sony anyway. The fact that so many people bitch instead of ignoring Sony makes me thing that if joystiq stopped reporting on Sony, there'd be some really bored people out there.

The 3 Ps: Phil Harrison, Peter Moore, Perrin Kaplan.

@24

i admit sessler might have done a better job but he made some excellent points. especially toward the beginning. jack came on talking about school shootings and how doom was responsible. adam countered by saying things like: with all the other media and violence and problems for american youth out there, to attempt to say video games are the sole cause in youth violence is insane!

the other guy said his kids punch and kick each other and fight all the time and they never play video games. they also went into the first ammendment and how creative expression is protected. and at the end of the day its parents' responsibility to censer whatever they find unsuitable for they kids to consume.

anyone with a brain can see jack has no case at all. he cited ONE study showing video games lead to violence. there could be ONE study out there that says the sun isnt the center of the solar system, or that the earth is flat. just because ONE group makes an outragious claim, does not, in any way, make it true.

J "the other bald meat" Allard

Paris Hilton is a coozbag

if anything, any press by jack thompson = free press. Oh Jack, just so you know, Mass Effect and BioShock, both for the XBox 360, feature PEOPLE DYING and the extensive use of THE FIRST AMENDMENT.

"When mainstream media organizations Google search Thompson, they find the gaming press' work. It gives them a better understanding of Thompson and his work."

For all the good it does us. They still treat him like an expert instead of a crazy person.