| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (9)

Posted: Mar 11th 2007 3:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
LittleBigPlanet simply looks fun.

Its the first thing to come from the ps3 that got my interest. Still waiting for some better games to be announced/shown, but when I get a ps3 I WILL buy and play LittleBigPlanet for sure.

I hope Media Molecule continues to do well, and that this game isn't just a one hit wonder.

Posted: Mar 11th 2007 3:10AM JonahFalcon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
1. You're making the same game over and over, just moving around objects.

2. Who gives a shit if you don't have software? You're not paying $600 to run a program you can do for $9.99 on the PC.

WHERE ARE THE ACTUAL EXCLUSIVE GAMES?! Warhawk? Killzone?

Posted: Mar 11th 2007 3:49AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Jonah

Boy-oh-boy, you should watch the latest IGN Weekly. They mention the Killzone footage that was shown behind closed doors. It was said that the real-time/in-game graphics are in NO WAY close to the original Killzone trailer. Prepare for a letdown of Red Steel proportions.

As for LittleBigPlanet, I'm conflicted. It looks fun to play, but it's not groundbreaking like everyone makes it out to be. And while we're on the subject of LBP, can I point out something quite hypocritical? Why is it that, on many ocassions prior to the Wii launch (and sometimes after), Sony/PS3 fanboys felt the need to start up the "kiddy" comments, only to drool over one of the kiddiest games I've seen in a long time? Then there's the huge dose of irony (and I'll quote IGN's Peer for this).

"The irony is of course that these guys use photorealism to express something whimsical and cartoonish. That's a realistic looking felt tree. But it's a FELT TREE."

All-in-all, I'm interested to play the game. However, I'll be playing it for free, as I would never pay $500 for a console, nor would I pay $60 for this game. Good thing I have friends who own the PS3.

Posted: Mar 11th 2007 4:09AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*sigh*

I play all sorts of games, and it's sad to me when something is labeled kiddy.

Take the Wii game Elebits for example. THAT is one harcore gamers game. The amount of skil, effort, and time it takes to 100% the thing is unbelievable. Not to mention the very complete level editor. Yet "gamers" call it kiddy.
Well those "gamers" that label games kiddy or not, are the kind of person that tries to justify their maturity for one reason or another.

I for one feel "kiddy" titles can be the best games ever. They're more imaginative.

LittleBigWorld is very imaginative. It could be labeld a kids game sure, but I dont mind it being called that. I'm 24 years old and would have a fun time crafting my own physics based puzzle. Running around with 3 other friends is always a blast too, regardless of age.

Honestly, I'd go as far to say a games like ManHunt are more "kiddy" than LittleBigWorld. At least LittleBigWorld offers some imagination and depth. A game like Manhunt(thought rated M for mature simply because of its viloent and graphic scenes) is so shallow and terribly worthless for your mind.

Before you as a gamer go around and label a game "kiddy", look at the games themselves and replace the content with candy and puppies if its viloent, or replace the cute with the most disgusting things you can think of. THEN, you can call a game "kiddy" once you get to its basic design.

Posted: Mar 11th 2007 4:18AM Vordus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why is it so brown?

Posted: Mar 11th 2007 12:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Next-Gen-Gamer:

Nobody saw killzone, they saw a demo of Edge, which happened to have some killzone-related material. They said it was in no way representative of a game, much less a final version of a game. Killzone is still under wraps, in development, and might be unveiled at min-E3.

I'm not saying the footage means nothing, because it sure does. I'm not saying it will hit the "target render" either, because that seems almost impossible. I'm just saying, let's wait for the official final product.

Besides, IGN isn't the only one with an opinion. GameSpot said that it's technologically impressive. Other's said that it doesn't look quite like the infamous E3 2005 video, but that it does have MGS4 quality graphics. That should be promising, especially since it is still in development; who knows? perhaps it'll be better later.

Posted: Mar 11th 2007 3:21PM samfish said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"It looks fun to play, but it's not groundbreaking like everyone makes it out to be."

Maybe I'm just not thinking of it, but I've never seen a co-op platformer like this, myself. Aren't there also supposed to be some crazy level editing capabilities, too, or something?

I REALLY like the look of this game. It's right up my alley. It's the first thing I've seen on the PS3 that I like. It almost makes me wish I didn't sell mine.

It's a shame, though, because there's no way in hell this game is going to sell on the PS3. I'd be really surprised if it sells over a million.

Also, going to what Next-Gen-Gamer said, I just love the hypocrisy from the Sony Fanboy Army relating to this game.
...or at least I would if I wasn't so sure that most of them are going to talk this game up and then not buy it.

Posted: Mar 11th 2007 4:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Aren't there also supposed to be some crazy level editing capabilities, too, or something?"

Level building capabilities is what this game is all about.
Check out the keynote about 34 minutes in for a fantastic demonstration of how it works.
http://uk.gamespot.com/search.html?qs=sony%20gdc%20keynote&sub=m&stype=11&type=11

There's a better quality version on ign but it takes a while to buffer up.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW