| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (10)

Posted: Mar 12th 2007 4:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wonder how Sony is going to handle the costs of developing 4D games! :)

Posted: Mar 12th 2007 4:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have been saying this for a while. 2D games are being neglected. Imagine what 2D games would look like if they used the processing power we have today.

Posted: Mar 12th 2007 5:05PM Magic Whiskey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Any, ANY story involving IGA and SoTN is worth reading! :)

The comment about how taking an 'oldschool' 2D into a high def world can prove as problematic as 'upscaling' a low rez image such as a .JPG file to a high definition .TIF. Imagine a picture of Alucard printed on a baloon. The more you inflate it, the wider spread the image becomes and more distorted. To compensate for it, there's a certain amount the computer has to 'simulate' between original pixels, and most of the time that insertion looks terrible. That's why games like SOTN might have taken so long to transfer to HD.

Games like Alien Hominid HD were easier, I'd assume, to transfer because cartoon images with less small pixel-by-pixel detail like AH HD sprites are.

Posted: Mar 12th 2007 5:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was not talking about transfering old 2D games to HD. I was talking about developing new ones.

Posted: Mar 13th 2007 9:22AM Niasyn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Alien hominid was easy because it was made with flash, whose base files are vectors and scale with no loss in quality. I would assume Castle Crashers is the same, which makes me a sad panda with all this "we need til '08" BS.

Posted: Mar 12th 2007 6:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i'd be fine playing new 2D games if they were like Super Mario Bros. 3 DS (was it 3?) where they made everything 2D except the characters. As long as its a better that average 2D game anyways.....

Posted: Mar 12th 2007 6:32PM Magic Whiskey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
HEADsoldier07, it was simply called Super Mario Bros for the DS.
My comments were mostly aimed at the Fanboy editor that commented on Behemoth.

Posted: Mar 12th 2007 8:04PM Hoffer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I love 2D games. I mean I don't want all 2D games, but I still love to play one here and there. That's why I think things like XBLA are great. Cloning Clyde was an awesome 2D game. I hope more developers make good, 2D games for downloadable services.

Posted: Mar 12th 2007 11:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I am actually playing the new Castlevania Dawn Of Sorrows at the moment, and the funny thing is that I bought the game as an afterthought when I was buying Crackdown, and I have not yet played Crackdown as I have been playing Castlevania for the past 2 days.

Posted: Mar 14th 2007 2:31PM Duscrom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#9

Thanks for stating the flash thing.

Which leads me to this. I don't understand why developers have to bitch about it being harder. If you're using 20 year old techniques still, then I agre it's going to be harder. nowadays there are so many techniques that can make a 2D game easier to produce. Things like Flash, using full 3D (LittleBigPlanet) or using 3D elements (2D characters on 3D backgrounds like in Marvel vs. Capcom, or 3D characters on 2D backgrounds like New Super Mario Bros, and the PSP Megman games)

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW