| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (9)

Posted: Mar 17th 2007 2:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know, I think he is probably right. I love movies almost as much as videogames and I rarely read movie reviews because they are usually pompous and focus on things that I don't care about. On the other hand, I read dozens of videogame reviews a week, even for games I only have a passing interest in.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2007 2:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree with him to some extent. Video game REVIEWS should focus on positive and negative points in a game that tell the reader whether he or she might enjoy the game, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't have publications that do focus on the "self important" (read: intelligent) analysis of certain games.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2007 3:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well here comes a vote for the pompous: if we as a community don't try and understand the meaning of video games - and all games have meaning, whether we like to believe it or not - then other people will find that meaning for us. And you better believe it, it won't be the meaning you like.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2007 4:02PM paralipsis said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, when I buy a movie ticket I pay a tiny fraction compared to the price of a AAA game title - I think that might influence slightly how much research (hence reading of game reviews) that I do. I don't think that I am entirely alone in this.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2007 4:07PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think that with the diversity of videogames as opposed to movies (while all movies simply entail sitting and watching, video games can entail many things, timed button presses, strategic planning, social interaction, faux social interaction, recent motion controls, etc) we should do away with individual reviews, since games can be interpreted MUCH more broadly

I think reviews should be done in a Wiki sort of way, with all sorts of people giving a rating from 1-5, and you see the average rating on the main page

Example: if you look at the User reviews on IGN for Sonic and the Secret Rings, you see most of the readers state that IGN was way too harsh in their 6.9 rating (same as Red Steel, no way that game was that mediocre)

I think game reviews should be a democratic thing, as the industry has not yet become a science (or an "art"), and the people's input is more important than a few dudes who play a game for an hour than pass judgement
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2007 4:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mr Khan: The problem with that is that people who choose to review a game are more likely than not to like it.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2007 5:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't know about this. I agree completely with the statement that videogame reviews are far superior to movie reviews - at least in execution. That said, I'm not really sure that they have much influence on the industry. Do people buy well-reviewed games, or are games that sell well just well-reviewed? There's a lot of lousy (and poorly reviewed) games, like a number of licenses, that nevertheless do quite well.

-Geoff
http://www.alinktothefuture.com
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2007 1:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I completely disagree.
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2007 8:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't disagree more with the anti-intellectual tone of this article. Pieces like this only undermine what little credibility gaming has in the world at large. Sliwinski betrays the immaturity of even the established gaming press: hypocritically bemoaning that the general public refuses to take them seriously while simultaneously pulling the legs out from under those few in their own community who try to elevate gaming dialog.

Just because your own writing lacks depth and complexity doesn't mean that you should deny the efforts of writers who do, very much, intend for "things" (symbolism, allusion, foreshadowing, etc.) "to be there."

Lowenstein was absolutely right. Gamers have grown up; it is no longer acceptable for reviewers to display only the perception and insight (much less the maturity) of a 9th grade English student.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Shank 2 review: Refined brutality

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45AM

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW