| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (23)

Posted: Apr 23rd 2007 11:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"In a recent article about Game Informer's "coverage" of Grand Theft Auto IV, Gifford said the piece was full of "glorified feature lists enhanced with developer quotes and insulated by hundred of words of filler.""

So it was like every other "first look" piece of game coverage?

Posted: Apr 23rd 2007 11:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Uh... sure. I suppose it's hard to be objective when the only source of your information is very careful about how it delivers and frames said info. Is the blogist wrong by thinking that the game informer article is anything more than a glorified press release? That's hard to say really... from my point of view the entire industry of games reporting is somewhat devoid of "journalism" to begin with... by I'm a "glass half empty" kind of guy. I don't think anyone who is a fan of the series that bought the mag for info is complaining either way though.

Posted: Apr 23rd 2007 11:41PM jynxycat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Read the article, and show me where else I can find ANY info on the game, besides this magazine.

Every other site just offers random scribbles about the trailer that we've all viewed 100 times.

-shrug-

Print isn't dead.

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 12:10AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The fact that the info's still exclusive justifies it a little bit, but it doesn't hide the fact that GI's not much more than a glorified ad rag; hell, it still does cheats, putting it onto the same pedestal of quality as... GamePro?

*sheesh*

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 12:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
C'mon folks it won't be long before periodicals dry up completely. They gotta do what they gotta do.
And unfortunately nothing they do will make it last forever. I personally would check daily the week EGM would hit stands(even though I had a sub) but now I could give a rip. The news is old and developers don't give a shit about a magazine. Reviews have become obviously biased. Better info is online anyway and with me checking Joystiq fiddy times a day on my phone it really gives EGM, GI, and NINPower no chance to draw me in. Article scoops are it for these guys. The rest of these mags are old news and crap stories nowadays.

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 12:54AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Add the fact that gaming journalists generally blow hard.

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 12:56AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Remember that EGM with SFII for the SNES on the cover?
...that mag used to be king. Now they GIVE it away.

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 1:09AM One Stomy Night go watch it said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
exclusive or no; i can still read it on the throne!

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 1:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Periodicals (magazines you hillbillies) really are circling the drain. 99% of magazines these days are more ad than magazine (just look at GamePro or PC Magazine) with 100 pages dedicated to advertisements and 10 dedicated to actual "News" (news that was "new" a week or two ago on the internet). In this internet age, a month is an eternity as far as delivering news is concerned, so companies (like the owner of GameInformer) are forced to pay companies for exclusive stories; Stories that unfortunately (for them) get immediatly ripped (literally, ripped and then scanned) by internet sites like Joystiq, and all the pertinent information rewritten. Magazines don't have another decade in them, they are probably done in the next half.

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 1:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well my comment is not about the GTA article per se as I haven't read it yet; but just to mention that EB games now carries G.I. mag which I might add is on the deck 2-3 days before the newsstands carry it at least in our little Canadian burg, so I grab it early. I give them kudos for being so far still an excellent mag as some of the others seem to have gotten skinnier with the same amount of crapshit ads in them-times [$$] they are a changin!

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 1:53AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
According to Official Playstation Magazine Australia

"OPS heads to New York for the world's first preview of Grand Theft Auto IV! We'll reveal everything you're dying to know about the biggest sequel in history!"

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 1:58AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Game Informer should certainly be one of the least respected gaming publications. G.I.'s subscriber base is dependent upon management-threatened employees pushing discount cards on submissive customers, their "unique" stories are slanted and unsubstantiated garbage (take a look at their PS3 price comparison article) and I haven't seen so many pandering cliches since Carson Daly hosted TRL. I could go into the fact that any idiot could read the average issue front to back in 5 minutes or that their ad-to-content ratio makes infomercials look appealing but I'll digress.

They're as close to scraping the bottom of a barrel as possible. I don't believe a worse gaming magazine has ever existed - G.I. isn't even worthy to line bird cages.

Posted: Apr 28th 2007 12:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
GI badmouthed too many games I enjoyed for me to give a rip what they say anymore.

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 8:10AM falcomadol said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"It's not like GI infiltrated the Rockstar building and retrieved the information for their readers. There was some deal made and GI got the exclusive -- good for them, it shows the muscle that comes with 2 million hard-sold Gamestop customers subscribers."

Indeed. Skimming through the issue before preparing to pop it in the trash, I noted that in this very issue they had a letter wondering about the state of games print journalism, and they trumpeted their multi-million circulation as a sign that print games mags weren't going anywhere.

This from a glorified sunday supermarket circular.

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 8:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That rumour about Niko dying is bogus. It was posted by a guy on gamefaqs (about two weeks ago) who claimed to know a guy who works at Rockstar. He slowly leaked more info until he finally gave up last week and revealed that it was all a big hoax after all.

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 9:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I didn't see anything wrong with the GI GTA article. They have gotten some pretty good exclusives in the past.

Who the fuck cares if some blog gets pissy because they didn't get it first. The "article" game me more info than what was available before which was none. It was a whole lot better than the endless dissecting of the "trailer".

GI isn't much but the "exclusives" are good info. Much better than a bitchy blog post anyday.

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 10:12AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"it shows the muscle that comes with 2 million hard-sold Gamestop customers subscribers."

Exactly. Were it not for Gamestop, would GI even exist?

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 10:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Because the magazine is "free" with a discount card at a game store, it's informational value is null? Hmmm... How much to you pay to read this glorified blog? Sure, you can get a lot of information from postage stamp sized pictures and poorly written editorial spin in every article here, but does that make this blog any better than a magazine?

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 12:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Magazine "exclusives" are nothing of that sort. Video game publishers pay big $$$ to have their game on the cover with "exclusive" information, which by the way is a full crock of shit.

Publishers and magazine speak 4 or 5 months in advance about how to show off the exclusive contact and package it like the magazine has something hot.

And this is why I hate gaming magazines.

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 12:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's what I read Game magazines for; exclusive content such as new pics, interviews, rumors and even their own opinions when reviewing games, not for the news

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 1:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, Dominion, how else would you have the publishers release the information? That's just how the industry works. Somebody, somewhere, has to be the first one carrying the story. And that's why I continue to order GI. They're the magazine that consistently gets those kind of stories, such as GTA:IV and a few months before that, StarWars Force Unleashed. Yeah, there's a shit-load of ads, and I rarely depend on their reviews anymore (they gave Godfather on the Wii a 6.5), but I like the cover stories like this one.

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 1:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Of course magazines have to arrange stories with the publishers. Much in the same way that internet news sites arrange for exclusive videos, new stories, and screens. much in the same way a news service will get access to a certain politician or the white house for an in-depth story. there's nothing unusual or wrong about it.

blogs do get their news in a different way though. they wait until they read about something in a magazine or on a internet news site, then recycle the story in their own words and add a few snarky comments and a link, and then pat themselves on the back for being the future of "journalism"

Posted: Apr 24th 2007 1:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
OK, which is it—gaming magazines pay huge sums of money to publishers to get exclusive stories, or they are a dying breed which will go out of business soon? It seems to me that if you think they pay off publishers for exclusives that they have a lot of money to throw about.

The sad fact is you guys have no idea how the publishing industry works. Game Informer gets all these exclusive stories because they have the largest reach, with a circulation now approaching 3 million. Publishers know that the exposure a game receives from being on the cover of a magazine with a circulation this large can make or break the game's sales. It's not rocket science, and it's not a conspiracy. It's economics.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW