| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (18)

Posted: May 10th 2007 3:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I absolutely adore weather effects in games. it adds SO much to the game in my opinion..makes where you are in game feel like a real place.
http://www.jodylovesnintendo.com
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2007 3:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Those screenshots are gorgeous.
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2007 3:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope to God they rethought their entire level loading mechanism. It was horrible! PGR3 is one of my favourite 360 games, but I simply can't draw myself to play it that often because of all the loading...
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2007 3:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
why is it that no games ever look better than racing games? is it the lack of people models?
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2007 3:29PM JoshMilewski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe it's easy to make cars look good?? I really don't know, but I have definitely noticed they usually look really good (well, at least the good ones do).

Anyway, what's the difference between Project Gotham Racing and Forza Motosport? They're both Microsoft-published racing/driving games. That's all I know, so someone please help me!
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2007 3:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#5 - Forza is a racing simulator, using mostly established tracks and allowing for car customization and setup. PGR is more of an arcade style racer, with the extent of customization being the color of your car. And instead of being established race courses, it's more of a "build tracks out of city streets"...
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2007 4:00PM JoshMilewski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So basically, Forza = Gran Turismo and PGR = Ridge Racer.
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2007 4:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@7

PGR is a game that meets Ridge Racer and Gran Turismo/Forza halfway. It's nowhere near as punishing and super detailed as Forza and GT, but it's not the fantasty track filled, techno laced, nitro using arcade experience of Ridge Racer.

PGR is for people who want real cars and real tracks but without difficult sim handling......and that's why I love it so.
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2007 4:44PM blueman10 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Tell me people what do i buy? Forza 2 or PGR4.
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2007 4:53PM embassy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
im very suprised MS is releasing both of their top racing franchises in the same year...isnt that borderline cannibalistic?
usually they swap racing games every other year...but not the same year.
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2007 5:03PM embassy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
oh and PGR is no where near as arcadey ( or corny) as ridge racer...its almost the perfect blend of arcade and sim..but god did the load times suck on pgr3...the in-car view is the best in a racing game tho.
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2007 5:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"oh and PGR is no where near as arcadey ( or corny) as ridge racer..."

I love Ridge Racer. More "arcade" style games need to realize that not EVERYONE wants to learn the 12 step program just to drift and maintain control. After all, you don't hear people bitching about the blue sparks, do you? Sometimes I just want to race, hit corners like an action star, blast the nitro, and do it all without worrying about blue shells. And, incidently, I love it's style.
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2007 6:46PM einhanderkiller said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The rain effects are purdy.
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2007 7:32PM embassy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
sheppy,

i just think other games do "acardey" style racing better than ridge racer, NFS series for one..and even something as over-the-top as burnout is more fun imo...and the insanely unbelieveable drifting is lame to me..its like your driving on rails. but to each is own.
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2007 8:03PM sand0789 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
dave,

Just play the demos. They are completely different games, but the descriptions above are punishing.

I would say Forza is less "fun" on the most basic level. But it is crazy realistic, which I love. You just need to get good and take it slow.

My only knock on Forza2 is that it is very difficult to get a feel for how fast you are going. You spin out and feel like it was for no reason, until you realize you were taking a pretty tight corner at 80. The game could benefit from some more unrealistic motion blur and periphreal objects flying by, just to help with the "feel" of the speed. That is just my opinion.

The Forza 2 demo rocks, though, if you are into that sort of thing.
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2007 9:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All I care about is does there gonna be another Geometry Wars??
Reply

Posted: May 11th 2007 2:06PM CJ9X said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Neat. Of course, in this case "dynamic" is an appropriately-used adjective and not a buzzword, but whatever. Blogs always gotta be edgy, I guess.
Reply

Posted: Jun 6th 2007 4:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
man i cant wait to see the full list of citys. i did see somwhere san francisco but i cant not say if it was but man i love driving in the citys. i cant wait also to see some pics of shanghai and more pics of st peatersburg
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW