| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (23)

Posted: May 25th 2007 12:11AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mario Party should NOT have online anyway. It wouldn't be any fun... Like playing single player.

I bet the game is a blast with 4 people, and alcohol involved. I'm pumped for this game!~
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 12:20AM iBubbles said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I like this series.
Maybe its because I always have at least three people playing at a time when I do.
But it is boring by yourself.
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 12:45AM cc123 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So it's not just mini-games, it's actually rehashes of mini-games.

Nintendo innovation indeed...
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 12:48AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Who would want to play a (non-chess) board game online?
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 12:57AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But so much waiting! Do those games at least have a way to shock the other players if they take too long?
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 1:12AM Maximo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think this game should have online. It would make too much sense. Why add a feature that allows a games value to go up? It's like offering extra boards or certain cars in a game for free. It's just dumb. I say charge me. So when it comes to online play, Nintendo should do the smartest thing which is what they're good at and stay away from the world wide web. The included web browser on the wii makes up for the the lack of online play anyway.
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 1:14AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll tell you what would make this and Chargers a must buy is if they added Tingle as a playable.
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 1:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@3

Not just minigames...but a Mario minigame. Boy, the 360 and the PS3 can never innovate like this...they should just give up now.

Nintendo awes me with their completely new and fresh innovative ideas and the way they innovate the innovation of their completly original innovative ideas.
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 2:42AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think the graphics are better than Gamecube, really. The sharpness, color and framerate from the trailer looks better than any Gamecube game I've seen (even on component cables). That's not to say it's overwhelming compared to Xbox 360-like graphics though...
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 3:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Their fight THEIR way away a variety of new gameboards. God that irks me.
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 3:09AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
hah... their way around, I mean. Doh!
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 6:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hmmm... new trolls.
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 7:07AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
MARIO PAAAAAAARTYYYYY !!!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ !!

BTW 14th bitches. I rule !
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 8:10AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You naive bastards! I admit it will be fun to play. Why Nintendo? Why do you continue with the same piece of shit quality as last gen. Jackasses!
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 9:00AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Jack
"15. You naive bastards! I admit it will be fun to play. Why Nintendo? Why do you continue with the same piece of shit quality as last gen. Jackasses!"

Because they can Jack, because they can. It has become apparent to me that almost no-one remembers the Nintendo arrogance of the late 80's to late 90's.
They were so arrogant that they said you dont need disc media. They said you dont need DVD media. Look at what that got them....2 anemic 3rd place finishes in the Playstation era.

Now they build (er excuse me) they repackage a GameCube with a silly motion controller and they re-sell it to the naive public as something not only new.....but innovative.

And you know what? The mobb eats it up, the same way a mobb of "faithful" eat up the crap that the likes of Benny Hinn, Jerry Falwell, and Adolf Hitler spewed or are still spewing from thier mouths.

So, Nintendo now realizes that they can do whatever, whenver they want to and the mobb will take it. They even got most of the mobb media to believe the massive amount of crap that they have been feeding to the mob as INNOVATION.

You cannot blame Nintendo for doing this....because it obviously works very well on the banta poodo. (weak-minded fools)

The only good thing about the crap that Nintendo has been shoveling to the masses is that some of Nintendo's recently converted flock is slowly waking up and realizing that they have just been fed a stinking gigantic pile of crap. Just look at all of the current Wee owners who are saying that it was tons of fun at first but now it is boring and the grafix suck.

Nintendo shovelware....coming to a re-hashed system near you.

Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 9:17AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jebus

My thoughts exactly. Good post
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 9:54AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@16
Congrats, you've Godwinned a talkback about a party game.

I think we can agree all three companies have shown an unhealthy amount of arrogance this generation. Nintendo's sales number back theirs up more than the competition... at the present time. Microsoft has done respectably, and Sony hasn't gotten their momentum yet.

Also...I don't think anybody's hearing something new when you say the Wii is a repackaged Gamecube with a silly motion controller - it's been done to death. At this point, people either agree or disagree, but hearing it one more time isn't going to change minds.

Nintendo could have gone the HD/graphics route and released a $400-600 system similar to their competitors. They chose a different price point and strategy, and we'll have to see how it plays out. The launch is encouraging, but only time will tell if the system has legs.
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 9:58AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@16
Sorry, one more thing..you suggested that the Nintendo 64 finished in 3rd place for its generation. Obviously Playstation was 1st, but who was 2nd?
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 12:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What the heck - why would I plunk down money for the same freaking minigames as the last version of Mario Party just with stupid motion controls?!?

If they are just re-packaging MP7 games for the Wii, this will be the first MP game I've ever skipped on. Saddening...
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 1:42PM darthservo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow. Has no one here played more than one of the past seven Mario Party games? Here's what is different with each release of Mario Party (keep in mind that I enjoy the series):

1. A new theme is designed.
2. New boards are designed.
3. New characters adn/or models are designed.
4. New mini games are designed.
5. New play modes are designed.
6. (This is the key) Mini-game mechanics remain unchanged.

To clarify on #6, button-mashing in MP1 is still button-mashing in MP7 no matter which way you look at it. The difference is that the games have been reskinned or rethemed to stay interesting to those who like the same thing with a new eye-candy.

Now, if you don't like the same mechanics, then you should probably only try out one of the MP game series. Don't try more than one in that case.

However, with MP8, this will be the first major improvement to mini-game mechanics. Why? The new control scheme. They can finally break away from the mold of button-mashing/timing and other mechanics. I for one am interested to see just how these work out in the MP series.

If you don't like mini-games, you don't like mini-games - MP8 is not going to change your mind. Move on. Remember, one of Nintendo's tactics is to market this console as a social gaming console - something for a group to do within a short time frame.

@16 - You've stated why the console is doing so well in your own post: The Wii is simple, and people like simple. Again, this is for casual gaming - something that most people have time for, unlike "hardcore" gamers. Why does this make them "weak-minded"? Because they're having fun?

And just for the record, there was *way* more media coverage over the PS3 than there ever was with the Wii at launch. Once the media realized people were buying them up (because again, people were having fun), then and only then did they give it attention.

As far as innovation is concerned - The definition of innovate is: To introduce as or as if new; to make changes; to do something in a new way. Nintendo has *based* the Wii on a new (as in new to consoles) controller. Therefore, yes, innovate is an appropriate term to use.
Reply

Posted: May 25th 2007 7:52PM KentuckyFrydCow28 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@16
I dont care that the last guy to lead Nintendo screwed up so badly. I have a Wii because I like the games that they come out with.

I also don't have a problem with people that bought a PS3 despite Sony's arrogance and mistakes. Why? Probably because they bought the system that has the games that they want.

I enjoy Nintendo games, so I will take my "stinking gigantic pile of crap" and enjoy it. Thank you.
Reply

Posted: Jul 11th 2007 3:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well now that it's out and I've played it, I think it's a pretty bad game. It doesn't have many minigames (Mario party 7 has more), and nothing has changed, really. You still just hit a dice, go around the board and buy stars. Honestly the Mario party games for the N64 were funner.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW