| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (58)

Posted: May 27th 2007 10:57AM MysticMaven said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, obviously there are a lot of young fanboys here.

There is a HUGE difference between the two. In the Hunter video alone, the lighting on the smoke is better. The smoke actually moves to the air movements caused by the Hunter, including it's breath.

Let me guess, you also think Doom 3 had the best graphics at the time? You know, since it took place in 30' rooms, compared to something like Battlefield which took place on gigantic maps. So does that mean Doom 3 had better graphics? Not IMO.

Posted: May 27th 2007 2:30PM PoisonedAl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The concentration of stupid in this thread is reaching toxic levels!

Posted: May 27th 2007 2:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
People, please shut the fuck up about Vista, already. It's not like anybody's forcing you to buy it. I have it running on my computer, and I actually like it better than XP. (GASP!) You're a retard if you think no games will run on Vista (I've gotten games as old as the original Sims to the new-ish Oblivion to run without a problem.)

Long story short, for those of you too illiterate to be bothered to read a wall of text, I want you to quit you bitching about Vista.

Posted: May 27th 2007 2:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
OH MY GOD, I FORGOT A PERIOD! EVERYBODY GO TO DEFCON 5! Everybody knows that if you forget a punctuation mark, that nullifies your argument.

Posted: May 28th 2007 8:26AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Poisoned AI #48
You know, typing "I'm an idiot" is a lot quicker. PC games will always look better then consoles, simply because games rigs cost so much and are updated on an almost weekly basis, unlike the 5 years or so of a console genaration. But as you're probably a 14-year-old using the internets on your mum's 486, I guess you wouldn't know anything about PC gaming

What are you talking about i been playing PC games in the last 3 years and i dont see a big graphical difference between 360 and PC, more expensive hardware does`tn mean better games and if you dont know i have a rig with fast Nvidia card 7900 GTX and 1 Gig ram but its a shame that consoles are beating PC games in graphic quality shame on you PC shame on you.........

Posted: May 28th 2007 12:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Diskoboy #47
Hey Trio, you do know Microsoft makes the 360 AND Windows Vista, right...

So why are you praising the 360, but badmouthing Vista? And everyone and their mother knows, PC's are almost always superior to home console hardware, in every regard.

That does`nt make sence just because microsoft is riping you off with your PC does not mean that iam in your same position as a console gamer shame on you

Posted: May 31st 2007 5:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh my good lord, Trio give up. Nothings a bigger MS ripoff than the 360, 100 dollar 20 gig HDD anyone? Consoles that last a week to 9 months, horse armor? Not allowing devs to give free maps or content because it makes them look bad to be charging so much for the same thing in their games? I went with PC gaming because its eventually a much better value, far cheaper software and if you aren't one to be suckered into the latest and greatest CPU and GFX its very affordable. Just think how much cheaper the 8800 or something even better will be when theres 10 games that actually use it? Yet people go buy em like idiots so you can get 150 FPS in FEAR, not for me. I would if I had the cash, hell, I'd have all of the consoles too in that case, but unless I get suddenly wealthier its going to be PCWii for me, when I get a Wii.
Oh, and how much is MS "ripping me off?" Jack squat, I bought a used copy of Win2k and it runs almost every game out there. Maybe in a year I'll go with the big XP upgrade.
That said I hope my rig has the chops to run this thing, but I'm not going to go out and blow cash on Vista and an 8800 to do that even when it comes out, I guess you learn a little patience when you're older, and you have the priorities to settle for the Dx9 version instead of making your kids eat dog food for a month.

Posted: Jun 1st 2007 12:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ 58 staxontoplyon23
That said I hope my rig has the chops to run this thing, but I'm not going to go out and blow cash on Vista and an 8800 to do that even when it comes out, I guess you learn a little patience when you're older, and you have the priorities to settle for the Dx9 version instead of making your kids eat dog food for a month.

@ 58 staxontoplyon23
That said I hope my rig has the chops to run this thing, but I'm not going to go out and blow cash on Vista and an 8800 to do that even when it comes out, I guess you learn a little patience when you're older, and you have the priorities to settle for the Dx9 version instead of making your kids eat dog food for a month.

Oh noo that means that you have to wait 1 or 2 years to play a game tha came out long time ago, but i dont have to be in your same position because i dont have to wait for too long to play the game i like, that means no hardware upgrade no drivers upgrade and no frustation with PC rigs like it or not consoles are a lot better then PCs and iam not talking about last generation consoles look my Xbox360 is beating up your candy eyes graphics cards with all this next generation games i know PC has been on top for all this years but this is the console revenge generation ask yourself why developers are making more and better games for consoles than PCs well its because they match PC harware and capabilities they are more convienience and many other reason that make consoles a better deal that PCs, btw even if you wait for prices to go down you still expend more money than consoles gamers,and i dont like to pay for downloads that are suppost to be free, Shame on you.......

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW