Zoetrope Interactive today announced a Lovecraft-inspired horror game in development for the PC: Darkness Within: In Pursuit of Loath Nolder. You take the role of police detective Howard E. Loreid (which is an anagram for "Stock Character") attempting to solve the murder of rich guy Clark Field who, as luck would have it, has had dabblings with the occult. According to Zoetrope, Darkness Within lets players explore the "eerie and disturbing corner[s] of the human psyche". If you met some of the people we know, that's a terrifying prospect indeed. Look for Darkness Within later this year. In the meantime, stare at the gallery below to get the spookiness flowing.
[Via CVG]
Reader Comments (15)
Posted: May 30th 2007 10:51AM (Unverified) said
They had me at Lovecraft...
Posted: May 30th 2007 11:13AM (Unverified) said
did anyone else play "call of cthulhu: dark corners of the earth"? that was a cool game based on the cthulhu lovecraft lore. if this is similar, ill be happy :)
Posted: May 30th 2007 11:12AM chdude3 said
Actually, "Howard E. Loreid" is an anagram of "I lorded a whore", or maybe "A red idol whore".
Posted: May 30th 2007 11:43AM Pipp said
So long as it isn't another Scratches, I'll be happy.
Posted: May 30th 2007 11:43AM (Unverified) said
"Howard E. Loreid (which is an anagram for "Stock Character")"
No its not!
Do you even know what an anagram is? It's a word/sentence made up by rearranging another word/sentence's letters. So how can "Howard E. Loreid" be an anagram for "Stock Character" when it has no S, no t, no c, no k, two o instead of 1, 1 a instead of 2, 2 r instead of 1 and two e instead of 1?
It's almost as far from an anagram as can be.
No its not!
Do you even know what an anagram is? It's a word/sentence made up by rearranging another word/sentence's letters. So how can "Howard E. Loreid" be an anagram for "Stock Character" when it has no S, no t, no c, no k, two o instead of 1, 1 a instead of 2, 2 r instead of 1 and two e instead of 1?
It's almost as far from an anagram as can be.
Posted: May 30th 2007 11:55AM (Unverified) said
...that was sarcasm.
Posted: May 30th 2007 11:56AM (Unverified) said
well spotted.. ;-)
Posted: May 30th 2007 11:57AM (Unverified) said
@ 5:
I think you need to brush up on your understanding of sarcasm.
I think you need to brush up on your understanding of sarcasm.
Posted: May 30th 2007 1:16PM 4ham said
Another Call of Cthulu: DCotE fan?! Yeah, I'm interested in this. The whole family would sit down and play that, and we just haven't found that magic with other games.
Posted: May 30th 2007 12:06PM (Unverified) said
Hey, I have that book.
Honestly, some of Love craft's stuff is really good, but most of it is really just absolute pulp mag crap.
Honestly, some of Love craft's stuff is really good, but most of it is really just absolute pulp mag crap.
Posted: May 30th 2007 12:49PM amalockh said
Did you mean "pseudonym", in a similar manner to the way Alan Smithee is a synonym for a pseudonym for any director who doesn't wish to be associated with a film?
Posted: May 30th 2007 1:54PM (Unverified) said
Call of cthulu was fun because of the speed at which you had to work sometimes, mixed with the crazy story of Lovecraft. This is going to be tougher because it appears point-and-click adventure. If I have to run around collecting numbers for a lock only open it and fin a clue to another puzzle I will get bored quickly. I have really enjoyed those games in sometime.
I will stay hopeful because I love Lovecraft's work, but that style does worry me.
I will stay hopeful because I love Lovecraft's work, but that style does worry me.
Posted: May 30th 2007 2:20PM (Unverified) said
"I think you need to brush up on your understanding of sarcasm."
No, writers need to actually learn how to write. I can't count how many times I have seen a poorly presented "joke" fall completely flat only to have the author or a helpful reader come along and inform us "it was sarcasm."
Ummm...if you have to point out that it is sarcasm, you have utterly failed at your craft and no blame should be leveled anywhere beyond the guy at keyboard. Period.
For the topic, I don't know...Lovecraft (from my admittedly limited exposure) has always come across as a Poe fan on acid. No reason to call it "bad" by any stretch, but hard to suspend disbelief and buy into a story when the whole time you are replaying your last few hours trying to figure out when someone dropped some peyote in your drink.
No, writers need to actually learn how to write. I can't count how many times I have seen a poorly presented "joke" fall completely flat only to have the author or a helpful reader come along and inform us "it was sarcasm."
Ummm...if you have to point out that it is sarcasm, you have utterly failed at your craft and no blame should be leveled anywhere beyond the guy at keyboard. Period.
For the topic, I don't know...Lovecraft (from my admittedly limited exposure) has always come across as a Poe fan on acid. No reason to call it "bad" by any stretch, but hard to suspend disbelief and buy into a story when the whole time you are replaying your last few hours trying to figure out when someone dropped some peyote in your drink.
Posted: May 30th 2007 2:49PM (Unverified) said
Some Jokes just go over people's heads, that's it, try to find all the jokes people missed from Futurama for example...
Posted: May 30th 2007 3:39PM Overgauss said
Gthulhu is coming.
Featured Stories
The politics of making games: Disconnect between 38 Studios and Rhode Island in quotes
Posted on May 24th 2012 6:45PM



