| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (15)

Posted: Jun 11th 2007 8:40PM Stevorino said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
IGN seems to think highly of this game...I might have to try it out. $10 is a little high though...
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2007 8:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i wouldn't waste my money on it because every time i play the old one i want to smash my keyboard into tiny bits out of pure frustration and rage. however, i really like what they've done with the updated graphics.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2007 8:58PM RobAccomando said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
doesn't the original take an hour to beat? I remember playing this on an apple back in the 80's. =)
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2007 10:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I loved this game. I just hope it performs decently with the xbox d-pad.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2007 9:07PM Stevorino said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Rare Hare-- Go read the IGN review, it seems like the controls reduce the original version's frustration...
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2007 9:26PM moofree said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Accomando: You only have an hour to beat the game... so yes.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2007 9:42PM Boiglenoight Darkstar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would pay $10 for a revamped edition of this game. It's a classic, and with new graphics and audio, it's choice nostalgia, man.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2007 9:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't know if $10 is too high. Yeah sure it takes an hour to beat the game. What's not obvious is that it will take you dozens of hours of retrying to beat this game whose chronological ordering of events is only one hour long.

I must admit, the XBLA games are becoming so beautiful that when the games begin to weigh in at 256 MB+ combined with the 360's compression technologies, you are going to see some amazing, and by that, I mean AMAZING games on the classic remakes and indie fronts. LOL, you may start even seeing some PSP ports (UMD's should fit). I'm love'n live at the moment.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2007 10:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Part of what makes this game hard are the shit controls... which is not a good reason for it to be hard.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2007 10:49PM Someguy9 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2007 2:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This needs to come out for the DS *immediately*
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2007 1:48AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Stevo (#4) said:

"Rare Hare-- Go read the IGN review, it seems like the controls reduce the original version's frustration..."

oh ok. well then, good deal. now if only i had a 360 :D.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2007 8:56AM dynamoman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
even though Im a nintendo fanboy, I recognize something good when I see it, and this rocks, I would have prefer the original game with the updated visuals, but anyway, I will buy it when its released.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2007 8:56AM mezzb said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've tried this game on DOSBox a few times, and its equally challenging offspring, "POP2".

The problem was always the imprecise little stutter-step the Prince would do at the end of every forward move. You'd stutter your princely butt right off a ledge into a cluster of spikes, yeouch.

If they can add the intuitive precision of the modern POP games this would be great, if not maybe a bit too easy & short. It certainly looks amazing.

I love 2D games enhanced with 3D goodness and smoothness. This is what Sonic should have always done.
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2007 1:55AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Def buying this one.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW