| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (11)

Posted: Jun 12th 2007 9:03AM Slaziman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The face of the guy in the middle is awesome
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2007 9:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd do both those blondes.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2007 10:46AM RobAccomando said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gamecock: stupidest name for a video game company. I think I'll start one called "Gamepussy" with a kitty cat as the mascot.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2007 11:39AM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So, EIEIO is gonna be on old MacDonald's farm, right?
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2007 12:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Rob, there's nothing wrong with the name, which is a reference to cockfighting. You're a 'tard, and your offspring will be 'tard clones of their 'tard father, who wouldn't know a good original name if it hit him on his misshapen 'tard head.

Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2007 12:30PM Slaziman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We know what the reference is too, but it still contains the word "cock"
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2007 12:48PM XLM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ samfish

So, what's stopping you?
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2007 2:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Rob:

Why the hostility toward the name 'Gamecock'? My university's mascot is the Gamecocks. Do you think we constantly look at it as a phallic reference? Grow up.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2007 2:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Rob, there's nothing wrong with the name, which is a reference to cockfighting."

Oh, well cockfighting! Why didn't you just say so?
Cockfighting is fine! There's nothing wrong with cockfighting at all! It *should* be glorified! That makes it sooooo much classier!


"So, what's stopping you?"

I can't afford them?
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2007 3:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Looking forward to seeing more of their work, especially Mushroom Men, just because it sounds so random. They seem to have a good (and refreshing) attitude towards the industry, too.
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2007 4:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh yes, yes, samfish, because companies should be punished for choosing controversial names to grab attention, and choosing such a name automatically means that said company's sole purpose is to give glory to it's namesake.

Take Two should be lambasted for it's support of stealing things (but only in pairs, mind you)

Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW