| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (60)

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 9:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah...I stopped shopping at Blockbuster when they threatened to send me to collections for a $10 late fee. That was about 9 years ago. I don't miss it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 9:39AM DBX00 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The stores are still popular in more rural areas where you may decide to rent the movie because a group of people are coming to your home for a impromptu party. Regardless of how you cut it, Blockbuster is the largest player in the market and they've chosen a side because the consumer is renting Blu Ray 70% of the time over HD DVD. The war is almost over and as soon as they get this decided the price of the hardware should go down as more and more people purchase it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 9:42AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Very good summary of the story. Before anyone bashes Blockbuster for doing this, the key part is that it's only their physical stores and that 70% of high def movie rentals were in Blu-Ray format already. This is not Blockbuster forcing their choice on consumers, this was consumers making their choice clear to Blockbuster.

I doubt we'll see Netflix and Blockbuster Online make a choice one way or another. The great thing about the online services is the fact that they don't need to have shelve space in a store. I bet the online rental services will stick to both format until the very end (if not even after that).
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 9:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sooner the war is over, the better.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 9:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
netflix already is doing digital distrubution.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 9:57AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@3 very true.

Online stores will not make a decision till long long long after the decision has been made, because shelf space isn't a premium like it is inside the B&M stores.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 9:59AM The1 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I said this on PS3FANBOY, I do not care what format Blockbuster supports. I want games for my PS3. Blu-Ray is not and will not sell a console as all NPD data shows.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 10:09AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This has no effect on the HD format war. First of all, hardly anyone rents HD movies at blockbuster. I go there on a weekly basis to ge tmy free in-store rental and I'm the only ever with my HD-DVD. I have never seen anyone rent a Blu-ray disc in the last 4 months. You know what's going to effect the format more? You guess it...porn. HD-DVD porn titles are starting to pop up. Blu-ray refuses to allow porn on their format. Don't underestimate the power of porn in all seriousness.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 10:12AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PC's rule. They'll use HD-DVD. I'ma burn all my media on to HD-DVD's. I need an HD-DVD player. Put it together.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 10:13AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Too bad blockbuster has been slowly dying for a few years now. And before anyone calls BS on that one, I was a store manager with them, so yes I know what I'm talking about. They are closing stores left and right, and the year I left they didn't give anyone in the company a raise for the entire year.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 10:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, I still feel as though this whole HD-format war is going to end up like the beta-max war.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 10:31AM IJoker said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just wanted to comment that I use Blockbuster online instead of Netflix because I recieve two coupons each month to rent games. So for the $19.95 monthly fee I feel it is a great deal. I rent Blu-Ray movies online and have rented every PS3 game so far for fee with my coupons. This is a huge bonus if I can start exchanging Blu-Ray movies I recieve in the mail at the store! Great Job Blockbuster!
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 10:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@chathampax

There are 3 Blu-ray porn titles to buy, same to HD-DVD too.

So no-one is winning for porn industry yet.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 10:33AM Altairio said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seems like a waste of their limited shelf space.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 10:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ 8 & 9

While I used to be in the HD-DVD camp (admittedly because I have a profound dislike for Sony), I've recently come to the conclusion that the main reasons I thought HD-DVD would win, are not as big of a factor.

The porn factor in this war won't make as huge of a difference as it did in the VHS wars because before then, the only way you could see a porno was at an actual movie theatre. VHS brought it home which made a HUGE difference, and it was also cheaper to product. Making Porn on HD is not only more expensive but unnessiary, most people get thier porn online.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 10:40AM jsgrill said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There are 5,800 Blockbuster stores in total. So, this is only 1/4 of the stores that will be carrying Blu-Ray.

250 stores will be carrying HD DVD and Blu-Ray.

Still, a blow to HD DVD.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 10:40AM copa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's pretty much official now. Sony lost the console war, and won the next-gen DVD player war.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 10:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't know if I'm in a minority here, but pr0n seems like something I wouldn't want in high definition. Please no pores and hair follicles! *shudders*
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 10:43AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Im happy with webcam porn.. who needs 1080p for that!!
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 10:45AM sand0789 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd say blu-ray is winning because it is dominating the movies that are coming out. Porn is a PC thing now. But someone brought up a good point in that PC's have a huge pull. If they start supporting HD-DVD drives first (which are cheaper drives and discs, and don't require a royalty paid to Sony), it will be a huge hit to Blu-ray.

Honestly, I am surprised that blu-ray is currently winning because it is a proprietary format, and those usually don't do as well. CD did (I think that was a Sony deal), but I don't know that it had a competitor like blu-ray and betamax did.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 10:53AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, this is pretty big news. All the major news outlets are reporting on this.

I thought BB was irrelevant. I must be in the minority.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 11:02AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I don't know if I'm in a minority here, but pr0n seems like something I wouldn't want in high definition. Please no pores and hair follicles! *shudders*"

Having actual sex must be a fucking nightmare.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 11:09AM horngreen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Do people really want to see bruised thighs and wet dycks in HD?
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 11:09AM KaneRobot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"The stores are still popular in more rural areas where you may decide to rent the movie because a group of people are coming to your home for a impromptu party."

Yes - and those "more rural areas" are the kinds of areas where HD capability/need for Blu-Ray is miniscule.

Why do people think that Netflix will go exclusive? Heck, I don't even know if Blockbuster Online will.

I'll come back and admit I was wrong if I turn out to be wrong - but having said that, I'm very comfortable to give this guarantee right now: despite Sony's marketing blitz, both formats will survive until dual format players make the format war irrelevant in the eyes of consumers. People have been saying "OMG ITS OVER" since January, and HD DVD has been doing fine. The attach rate is much higher than Blu-Ray, and standalone player sales are higher than Blu-Ray. The sales of HD DVD titles have been on a strong upward trend ever since the March "drought" ended.

I'M NOT SIDING WITH ONE OR THE OTHER HERE, I'm fortunately able to own both so it doesn't matter to me. I'm just giving my opinion based on what I've seen from following this pretty closely over the past year. I really doubt one format will be erased from existence before dual format players are reasonably affordable (say, the price of a Blu-Ray player now).
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 11:09AM CaptNink said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Ihya

LOL! Good one!
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 11:12AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@15:

Right now, PS3 is helping Blu-Ray win the format war. Next-year, when every AAA 360 game is shipping on multiple DVDs, Blu-Ray will help PS3 win the next-gen console war.

At $60 a pop, I'd rather buy the game that didn't have to cut corners just to fit.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 11:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
HA,ha,ha sad for those Xbox360 gamers who bought HDDVD player...

Shame on you.........
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 11:28AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
AHAHAHAHA! Sad for us who still don't give a crap about an HD disc format and still enjoy DVD. We're in the majority, douchebags.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 11:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just one of many stories to come that will prove the establishment of blu-ray. Everyone says it's pointless. Well then why are big expensive HDTV's selling so well, and selling more each year?

@7 Not on feature ever pushes sales. I don't know why people look at one game and say, "It won't move consoles". Not any one game moves consoles. Each game moves a console here or there, and together they all move consoles. It's the same with features like media playability. Blu-Ray was one of the factors when I was deciding between a 360 and a PS3, because I recently got an HDTV. Blu-Ray is distinctly different than dvd, especially when you have an HDTV, and I haven't even tapped into the full potential yet (with the uncompressed audio).

It helped move THIS console. It was just one of the many features though. For me, reasons why I got a 360 are more than just 1 exclusive, 2 exclusives, blu-ray, wireless and wired internet built in, folding@home, remote play, etc... It was ALL of those things combined, and that's why I believe Sony is smart for offering a lot more diversity to their customers and seeing the big picture for the next almost 10 years, and not just profits in 2 years.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 11:33AM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@26

Yesterday my friend brought RE4 for gamecube to my place and threw it in the wii

After watching this amazing, critically acclaimed game play for a couple hourse I looked at the box and noticed it's 2 disks.

I just thought "somewhere out there is a lamer thinking multi discs = suck, meanwhile we are playing one of the greatest games ever made"

To all the PS3 fanboys who always talk about not needing 2-3 discs...

try using a pc. install the game, then throw away the cd. yep. NO DISCS. beat that.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 11:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@30,

I agree with most of that, but still some PC games require you to at least have the first disc in the drive to start the game up. Not all of 'em, but I have enough that do.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 11:42AM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@31

True but

1. there are some "fixes" for that on the internets
2. unlike wii/ps3/360, my pc can have 2-3 CDs in at once, as well as 2 CD/DVD images loaded on the HD.

So unelss you play more than 5 games regularly , you don't really need to switch CDs... =P
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 11:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"The future its here only when Sony say its here"
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 11:49AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@#8

That is not true. Sony has recently decided to support the porn industry.

FYI

PS...I rent Blue-Ray movies at my local BB.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 11:56AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why most of the american are soo sick they talk about porn too much, please change the subjects.....
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 11:59AM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@35 It was brought up because these kinds of videos came to bluray first, and some people thought it meant that bluray would win the format war.

It was a legitimate talking point. Nobody is going into specifics of the disc contents.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 12:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I stand corrected on the blu-ray porn position. It does support my claim that porn is important to both HD camps. Obviously Sony realized that it was important enough for them to support. In regards to the whole "you have to change discs for the XBOX 360" this is why we are the laziest and fattest nation in the world. Oh my god, you have to get up and change a disc after palying 30 hours of a video game. The software sells the games, not well I don't have to change discs. The majority of multiple discs will be Japanese RPGS since gamers expect 50+ hours of gameplay. They put G of W on 1 disc and now you can download multiple maps to extend the lifespan of the game. Nobody expect idiots are buying a PS3 because I don't have to change discs. Also, all that extra capacity on blu-ray for games...where is the benefit? Tell me a game where a developer was like we have to make the game on PS3 because of the extra capacity. Developers don't give a shit because that means longer and more expensive development cost and the costs are already sky high. The only exception would be big Sony A+ exclusives (the few that exists), like FFXIII. However, not many developers can afford the budget or time for a FFXIII game. Before idiots flame me for being a 360 fanboy, I WILL buy a PS3 when FFXIII comes out. I buy the system when good games come out, not because it's blu-ray and not because I don't have to change fucking discs.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 12:38PM Altairio said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Aren't the number of releases on each format pretty even? Bluray is ahead but it's pretty close. It's around 200ish for both isn't it?
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 12:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm still fine with my damn DVD player. The only people telling me that my 36-inch SDTV and my DVD player are outdated are, of course, the two companies who want me to spend 4000 dollars on new shit.

No thanks, guys.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 12:53PM Burritoclock said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey Joe I'll tell you your shit is outdated too. Doesn't mean you have to run out and buy the newest thing, but I don't understand the hostility, unless you are just mad you can't afford it, and that's cool.

Personally, once I saw HD tv and then HD-DVD I fell in love and could never go back to an SDTV.

(Now excuse me while I go make out with my 61' lover...)
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 1:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Ihya

I don't have sex with a magnifying glass.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 1:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@40:

61 feet? Does that thing have an atomic pile it runs on?
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 1:46PM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
never mind that the momentum is on HD-DVD's side. The only reason Blu-Ray has a leg up is because of the PS3. When comparing the sales of stand alone players, HD-DVD is still coming on strong. More HD movie consumers are choosing HD-DVD than blu-ray.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 1:54PM Vay1en said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"The North American HD DVD Promotional Group said Blockbuster's decision was shortsighted and skewed by the success of films released by Blu-ray studios in the first three months of the year. The group said HD DVD has since gained momentum, selling more players and popular titles such as "The 40-Year Old Virgin" and "The Matrix" trilogy."

That's pretty funny since The Matrix trilogy is not exclusive to HD-DVD. As far as "The 40 Year Old Virgin"... Fine movie. I love everything Judd Apatow does, but it's not the kind of title that sells players. Comedies like that are fine on a regular DVD player. People who are spending the $$$ for HDTV want movies like Spiderman, Pirates and Casino Royale to show off the amazing 1080p glory.

HD-DVD should never have been made. Toshiba made a big mistake walking away from the table when Sony was offering to make a unified format.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 1:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Toshiba down... MS next in line. Good job Sony.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 2:02PM Bobbo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I truly believe we will all have a pretty clear answer after this Christmas season.

HD-DVD drives are still much cheaper than Blu-Ray drives. And do not underestimate the current 360 owners who have been waiting for next christmas to purchase the HD-DVD add on drive. Last christmas 360 owners purchased 150,000 units. And those 150,000 people will definately be purchasing movies which cannot be said of PS3 customers that may or may not ever view Blu-Ray movies on their PS3. After all...remember that many people that own PS3s probably still have Standard Def TV sets. To them Blu-Ray is useless.

Blockbuster is nearly irrelevant. They will not be able to get behind either format fast enough before HD downloads become commonplace and render physical rentals useless.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 2:19PM cc123 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@chathampax

"Tell me a game where a developer was like we have to make the game on PS3 because of the extra capacity. Developers don't give a shit because that means longer and more expensive development cost and the costs are already sky high."

You are just talking completely out of your ass. The second developers have to start considering the disc space it has become a limitation. Don't assume that because games fit on DVD at the moment it means they didn't want a bigger disc size. It most likely means that certain things got cut from the game or that the developers had to spend time trying to figure out clever ways of making it fit.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 2:28PM Zoot Suit Jedi Grammar Hammer En said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Konajinx

LMAO!! That's a big frickin' television.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 2:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I find it funny people still aguing over blu ray and hddvd when for the last couple of months blu ray has had this war in the bag.

make up all the excuses you want..blah blah porn..blah blah cheaper players...blah blah walmart..heard it all and the proof is in the pudding.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2007 2:52PM Burritoclock said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What pudding would that be, the same pudding the PS3 is in? Didn't think so, I'll admit HD-DVD is dead when you admit the PS3 is dead, since both are having trouble, although sadly HD-DVD is actually in a better position....
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW