| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (29)

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 10:33AM Burritoclock said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wonder if these C.E.O.'s are aware of the vicious circle they themselves are part of creating. They release games for last gen systems because of the huge install base,nothing wrong with that, but ignoring the new systems slows them from gaining an install base. He really makes good points, too bad it's the correct/damage control and not the original statement...
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 10:31AM bearattack said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PS3??? oh, that expensive blue ray player?
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 10:45AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wonder where I can buy some of the pot he's smoking?
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 10:43AM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So he's not saying "it needs a lower price", but he is saying 'it needs a lower price' (notice the lack of a direct quote ;). Well, it may or may not be worth the money to have the tech, but a $600 pricetag is not going to win over a lot of customers regardless.

The whole industry is saying 'it needs a lower price', why can't this guy have the stones to stick up with his original statement?
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 10:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hmmm. How convenient. Just as Haze happens to "vanish" from Ubisoft's release list for 360/PC all the sudden the PS3 is now "the right price".

A message to Yves Guillemot:

The numbers don't lie. If the PS3 price was right, then why is Sony only selling 80,000 of them every month? The PS2 never saw numbers that low. In fact, it's worst month was 180,000 back in April of 04. The XBOX sold 300,000 that month due to a price drop. But the PS3 price is right huh?
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 10:48AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
wasn't #1's comment the best joke you've ever heard?? wow, i can't stop laughing,

what i really think is that ubisoft actually finally got a ps3 and they realized what type of machine it is, and then they realized is worth the prize, who cares about ubi, they keep treating the ps3 like a piece of crap, i rather them not make a game than keep making shitty ports, yeah thanks for haze, i still hate ubi.

watch in 1 year they're gonna be kissing sony's ass, sony should pull the plug on these bastards and give the money to a new company that will show it's loyalty
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 10:52AM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Just as Haze happens to "vanish" from Ubisoft's release list for 360/PC all the sudden the PS3 is now "the right price"."

From what I saw earlier in the week, Haze releases on the PS3 ONE WEEK earlier than the 360 and PC versions.
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 10:53AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
THE PS3 IS DEAD!

who cares, a price cut will not dig sony out of the 700ft pit they are in.

Get the publishers back and we will talk.
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 10:54AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
wow and now ubisoft says that Haze is still not confirmed on 360 or pc.. that the release date was an error..

my goodness could this people make up their mind..

ubisoft is like an already annoying girlfriend going thru pms... make up your mind freaks
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 10:56AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 10:57AM copa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It makes more sense in context of the full interview:

Guillemot: "Sony has sold a machine that is actually expensive to build at the right price for consumers."

GI.Biz: "So does that mean that you will start doing day-and-date releases of games like GRAW2 while the PS3 is still $600."

Guillemot: "Fuck no."
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 11:03AM Fernando Rocker said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To Guillemot: Just because you win a lot of money of dollars every week to think that $600 plus tax, plus $60 for a game is a good price, doesnt mean that 80% of the people will spend and want to spend that amount of money on a gaming device (actually, is more a movie player device and protein researcher than a gaming device).
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 12:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I like how they can beat around the bush and be so vague when you know they can just get their point out in less than 10 words.

"$600 was okay at first- now lower the price."

9 "words". Was that so hard?
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 11:15AM Tez said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PS3, or iPhone?
Hmm...
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 11:31AM Negativecool said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fernando Rocker-
"...you win a lot of money of dollars"
"...will spend and want to spend"
" actually, is more a movie player device and protein researcher"

....

You forgot "all your base are belong to us"
Make sense!
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 11:40AM NintendoFanbot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
GBA sez:

"The Price is LOL"
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 11:42AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Am I the only one that think sit's ridiculous to make such a big deal about $100-200 (PS3 vs the 360) dollars on a purchase you make every 4 years?

I think what's really happening is people who invested in the 360 want the PS3 to crash so they can avoid having to buy a second console, I wouldn't be surprised if the tables turned completely had the PS3 beaten the 360 to market.
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 11:54AM Fernando Rocker said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Negativecool

I have a limited english... I can read in English like 90%, but I can't write in english very well =(
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 12:11PM RobAccomando said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"It's all about the install base"? Then where the f@ck are all the good Wii games? (I know there's some, but come on 3rd parties)
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 12:37PM TacoHell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@hahanoob

The problem is exacly the $200 difference. Many people see $400 as the limit of how much money they will ever spend on a system, since they will buy games, and possibly another controller and so on. While people know that if you pay $600 you still need to buy an extra controller (if you want to play multiplayer with your buddies next to you), games, and so forth so the total will be more about $700~800 and most people don't have that much money to spend freely.
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 12:58PM horngreen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
QUOTE "watch in 1 year they're gonna be kissing sony's ass, sony should pull the plug on these bastards and give the money to a new company that will show it's loyalty"

yes a $600 machine with little or no games worth playing should really start calling the shots on developers and "pulling the plug" that will help! Anyway I wonder if Sony in their arrogance thought "if we have a weak game line up people will start scooping up Blu Ray disc and later we can introduce good games". Probably not I guess they just figured they couldn't lose and they were soooo wrong.
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 1:19PM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You guys forgot next gen doesn't start till SONY says it does. So until Sony ASKS Ubi to make some NEXT GEN, it won't happen.

Also in French "earn" and "win" are the same verb, so it's probably like that in Fernando's language also. Esperanto much?

As for this guy, he has got to realize investing in Sony is a bad business move at this point. I am not dissing Sony, it's just that from a marketing standpoint it makes no sense to bet on the "losing" horse now. Wait till/if PS3 catches on big time, THEN CAPITALIZE BIG TIME.

Besides why spend millions to make PS3 games when you can just add waggle to some old game for free?
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 1:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Same trolls, same broken record spiel, different day.
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 1:28PM deaftly said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
prob get more use out of the iphone then the ps3
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 1:31PM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
an iphone is a giant mistake. sure it looks cool but guess what, it is a very expensive liability. unlike a ps3 you will be carrying this little thief magnet everywhere, and after a couple months you won't give a damn what cool features it has.

For the price of an iphone you could get a DS, PSP, and a decent other phone, and even some good games for each of those.
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 1:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The price is right? BULLSHIT, BOB BARKER!

http://playstation3.justgotowned.com/
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 1:54PM D3m0sthenes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@26

But It's sooooo pretty! LOL.
Well anyway, we all know the price is way to high for the mass market so what do we (or anyone else) care what this guy says. Not saying that the PS3 isn't worth it, it is for the tech it has, but to most people that doesn't matter.
Reply

Posted: Jun 20th 2007 4:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait... What?

The PS3 is priced to not move mass inventory. As a publisher, I'd be concerned about that.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2007 7:12AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm just waiting for a PS3 price drop and a redesign as a Foreman grill...
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW