| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (17)

Posted: Jun 22nd 2007 4:45PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I want all bills and political messages to carry a warning that says, "Warning the following message is most likely delivered by a souless, sucker of satans cock."

Posted: Jun 22nd 2007 4:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
^haha! :D

Posted: Jun 22nd 2007 5:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And yet they retain the felony classification.

Want to know what else is a class E felony? Law of the Game has a short piece on it:
http://lawofthegame.blogspot.com/2007/06/new-york-gaming-bill-what-is-class-e.html

Posted: Jun 22nd 2007 5:03PM Joanna D said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Great idea. I'm all for video games and video games of a violent nature but it should definitely be a crime to sell them to a minor.

Too bad the current ESRB system doesn't allow for clearer ratings. They should take hints from systems like the BBFC in the United Kingdom which simply have an age on the box. If the child is younger it's illegal to sell to them. Works great and it's always clear that it's the retailer's fault (or the parent's, if they bought the game) if some kid goes wild and blames video games.

Posted: Jun 22nd 2007 5:07PM Fish Face McGee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They do post an age. On M it's 17+ on T its 13+.

Posted: Jun 22nd 2007 5:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Let's all point and laugh at Neil Christie for he

"they should totally do what they are already doing"

post.

Posted: Jun 22nd 2007 5:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*points and laughs at Neil Christie

Posted: Jun 22nd 2007 5:55PM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not good at pointing. Points at random object "Ha Ha."

Posted: Jun 22nd 2007 5:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*points at dead pony*

*whispers "i want you inside me"*

*begins to question japanese beetle digging into his inner ear*

Posted: Jun 22nd 2007 6:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow i cant wait for this bill to violate the 1st amendment and be shot down.

I be a New Yorker.

Posted: Jun 22nd 2007 6:57PM Joanna D said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My point was that it isn't really clear what the intended audience of the game is at a glance - "M" doesn't really mean anything to a parent, does it? And the actual age is printed in TINY lettering.

Posted: Jun 22nd 2007 7:38PM Fish Face McGee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes, but the Movie Industry just has PG-13 and R written in even smaller writing on DVD caes, why does the interactive nature of video games make it so much more important for ratings when, with the exception of the Wii, you aren't actually emulating the actions you are perpetrating in the games.

Posted: Jun 22nd 2007 9:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Neil Christie: The First Amendment is a dangerous thing to disregard. Consider the consequences before you give up your rights.

Posted: Jun 22nd 2007 11:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Two words: Fascist Nazis

Prostitution and selling alcohol to a minor is less of a crime than this in New York.

New York shame on you.

Posted: Jun 24th 2007 2:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Neil Christie I guess its a good thing our forefather protected us from people like you!


Burn any books lately?

Posted: Jun 24th 2007 5:30PM Quamie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This bill is wrong on so many levels, I pray it gets killed by the courts:/

There is no PROVEN link between violent games and violent behaviors. Any study attempting to prove this has failed MISSERABLY, on multiple levels.

In fact, if you wanted to argue this on a factual basis: In the last 10 years in which we've seen truly violent video games, the population of the US has risen, while the arrest and conviction of juveniles has gone down EVERY YEAR for the past 10 years, as video games get more and more violent, and as the US population rises, juvenile crime rate goes down.

How does that make sense? If these games are turning our kids into monsters, why aren't they monsters?

Most retailers already require its employees to ID for M rated games, and all games sold on console systems are required to be rated. Also all current next-gen consoles have parental lockout features already in place.

Plus it’s a FELONY? Its not a felony to sell cigarettes or alcohol, substances that have proven harmful physical, mental, and addictive properties. But it’s a felony to sell a video game, which has none of the above?

What’s obvious to you isn't obvious to me. When you make the claim that violent video games have negative effects on children, because it "seems like common sense" then you’re in the dark ages my friend. It was common sense that the world was the center of the universe way back when, and anyone you told otherwise would laugh at you. All factual evidence points to the contrary. To be honest, it seems like common sense to me, that since juvenile crime is on a steady 10 year decline which directly coincides with the advent of realistically violent video games, it seems just as obvious to me that, instead of games turning your average child into a nutcase, it gives the kids that are already pre-disposed to such mental problems, a violent and bloody outlet, that hurts no one, and thus keeps them from acting out in the real world.

Leave your biased, subjective common sense out of gaming. If you can prove it, then I’m all for it, if games are really causing our children to become violent criminals, then prove it, before you take it as factual common sense and sentence some 20-something retail worker to 5-10 years in a federal prison for causing NO HARM WHATSOEVER.


Posted: Jul 3rd 2007 12:54AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm against the sale of violent video games to minors as well. .

but i mean c'monnn. A FELONY??!!

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW