Rainbow Six Vegas expands yet again with Black Edition

by Justin McElroy { Jun 26th 2007 at 10:00AM }

Rainbow Six Vegas continues to roll along, picking up new levels like some sort of very specific Katamari. This new infusion of terrorist-thwomping action (just two months after your last hit) is called the Player's Pack Black Edition and will run you 800 points ($10).

For your sawbuck, you'll nab three brand new maps like Red Lotus and Wartown plus a revamped version of Streets. You'll also get an appearance from a very special guest star: PRESIDIO, which the elderly among you may remember from Rainbow Six 3. The content weighs in at 705 MB and is available now.

Tags: dlc, majornelson, rainbowsix, ubisoft, vegas

Related From Joystiq

GOG in the Machine: In Cold Blood, Painkiller
285 days ago
Rumor: New Ghost Recon, Rainbow Six this year
305 days ago
4GB Piano Black PSP Brite bundle nixed, sticking with Ratchet & Clank pack
376 days ago

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Brian Burnes @ Jun 26th 2007 10:21AM

Wow....the rumors were true. If they do this every 4-6 months I'll never stop playing this game.

ChuckSteak0331 @ Jun 26th 2007 10:20AM

Good thing cause the PS3 version comes with the red and black map packs. Also, isnt 10 bucks a little high for three maps? Esp when one is just another revamp of a previous map. Oh well.

ridestowe @ Jun 26th 2007 10:21AM

is that agent 47 on the left?

Big Drizzle @ Jun 26th 2007 10:41AM

So this is gonna make the PS3 version and the 360 versions equal right

Phranctoast @ Jun 26th 2007 10:48AM

equal except for the additional $10 the black edition will cost 360 users.

Phranctoast @ Jun 26th 2007 10:48AM

equal except for the additional $10 the black edition will cost 360 users.

chenry @ Jun 26th 2007 10:58AM

I'd pay $10 for just Presidio!

Tadioku @ Jun 26th 2007 11:22AM

actually the 360 version costs a total of 20$ more then the PS3 version because of this map pack and another map pack included.

Dustin @ Jun 26th 2007 11:25AM

Of course you could look at that $10 versus waiting months and months to play it at all, so yeah... equal.

Jon @ Jun 26th 2007 11:27AM

ACTUALLY...

The PS3 version costs what? $180 more?
PS3 console price - 360 console price - $20 for maps.

And how much is all that time worth that us 360 owners have been playing the game?

360>3...duh... it is a MUCH bigger number.

cc123 @ Jun 26th 2007 11:37AM

Interesting....so this is how the xbox people rationalize getting microraped.

devi8i @ Jun 26th 2007 11:42AM

ACTUALLY ACTUALLY.... you forgot to subtract the $50 for xbox live gold annually and another $100 for the wireless adapter and $15 for rechargeable batteries.. so i guess that means only about a $15 difference, until next year anyways when you have to re-up your live subscription again.

olanarchangel @ Jun 26th 2007 11:46AM

ACTUALLY ACTUALLY ACTUALLY you don't need the wireless adapter to play, so your figure is inflated $100.

Ari @ Jun 26th 2007 8:11PM

ACTUALLY ACTUALLY ACTUALLY can't we all just STFU with the console hating and just enjoy Rainbow Six Vegas as a collective unit of FPS lovers?!?

XBOX 360 FTW!!!

MrPaulJames @ Jun 26th 2007 12:04PM

Like a bunch of fucking children the lot of ya. Play what you fucking well want to play on. Xbox has a decent well established online MP. PS3 will have the map packs included.

Can you all just stop bickering like a bunch of whiny little bitches.

Spitkicker @ Jun 26th 2007 12:36PM

@devi8i
Uh you cant add a wireless adapter into that cost moron. I sure as fuck don't have one nor do I need one. Keep playing on your pathetic 'free' (P)iece Of (S)hit (3) online. By the way you know XBOX LIVE completely destroys SONY's half asses service.

Spitkicker @ Jun 26th 2007 12:37PM

Well time to get more points. What a pleasant surprise. This game is my favorite 360 game, one of my favorite games ever.

Jake @ Jun 26th 2007 1:46PM

So, the PS3 version will include both $10 downloadable map packs that have been added to the 360 version. Umm, link please.

Digi Smalls @ Jun 26th 2007 1:53PM

if $10 (x2) is microrape, what kind of rape is an extra $200 and waiting what, 8 months now?

.

ChuckSteak0331 @ Jun 26th 2007 1:57PM

Well you can always google it, or heck even check the ubisoft website. You can watch the PS3 version and watch them play through one of the new maps. http://www.gametrailers.com/player/20839.html
Crap man, there is about a thousand places to check for that, and guess what, old news.

Stan @ Jun 26th 2007 3:06PM

Ok, what happened to the statement MS made that they wouldn't charge for content that's free on other consoles.

Someone said it on Major Nelson around the time they were explaining the new Achievement policy.

Chainblast @ Jun 26th 2007 4:32PM

"if $10 (x2) is microrape, what kind of rape is an extra $200 and waiting what, 8 months now?"

Technically anyone could have paid $100 less for the 20GB PS3 SKU, combine that with the inclusion of the Live! content packs and your total should be adjusted to $80 instead of $200. I could argue for a further $50 reduction to cover Live! costs but the PS3 20GB SKU didn't come with a headset, something much needed for this game online.

Waiting 8 months means little to me. It's not going to make the game experience worse, it's not costing myself more money. Boo-hoo, x360 players got to play it first.

When you break it down the PS3 really isn't as expensive as the trend seems to dictate. But that's one thing you learn about people whilst working with the public, they base almost everything they do, think or say on here-say. That's a bit off topic but half the responses on this site are.

Digi Smalls @ Jun 26th 2007 4:37PM

Chainblast,

what PS3 20GB SKU? Sony took that option away from you.

.

cc123 @ Jun 26th 2007 5:29PM

"if $10 (x2) is microrape, what kind of rape is an extra $200 and waiting what, 8 months now?"

The PS3 is only 7 months old so I don't know how the fuck anybody could have expected the game to have been out 8 months ago. Multiplatform games seem to be coming in at the same time now and future schedules show same time releases so this is a moot point. Funny how xbots conveniently "forgot" the 360 has been out a year longer than PS3.

Also since your getting wifi a blu-ray player and free PSN the extra $200 is just fine in my book.

But since we're on the subject, what kind of rape is the $140 for the first out of warranty repair?

It sounds like unlubricated anal rape to me...

Digi Smalls @ Jun 26th 2007 5:59PM

the 360 was 4 months old when Ubi's GRAW came out. where is the PS3's? and thats a port.

no one forgot the 360's launch date. the very point is that the 360 came out a year before the PS3. as a much better game machine and significantly cheaper. in 2005.

making us wait months to a year longer for inferior, rumbless versions of games and charging us $200 for the privilege is the rape of the decade.

love to see people scurry to the RROD argument. you're making a desperately wild assumption that everyone's had an RROD, and out of warranty to boot. is that really the best you can do?

unlike that inane assumption, i know what all PS3s costs at retail. and i know nobody played Rainbow 6 on PS3 until just now.

.

cc123 @ Jun 26th 2007 6:13PM

"the 360 was 4 months old when Ubi's GRAW came out. where is the PS3's? and thats a port."

You would have to ask Ubisoft why they kept delaying it month after month.

"360 came out a year before the PS3. as a much better game machine"

Based on your own stupid opinion I guess. The main thing the 360 has on the PS3 at this point is the games library which it amassed in THE EXTRA YEAR.

"love to see people scurry to the RROD argument. you're making a desperately wild assumption that everyone's had an RROD, and out of warranty to boot. is that really the best you can do?"

It's beyond the point of an assumption now. You can almost count on the pos dying on you so yes you should factor in repairs or extra warranty. The shit is about to hit the fan with this...

"unlike that inane assumption, i know what all PS3s costs at retail. and i know nobody played Rainbow 6 on PS3 until just now."

I know XBL costs 50 a year so in four quick years, you know the life of a console, the prices will be even...that's not even taking the price drops into consideration. I really doubt MS is going to drop the price on live though.

"is that really the best you can do? "

Let's see a couple of days ago I said the 360 sales are miserable and your brilliant comeback was

"So if the 360 sales are miserable what does that make the PS3 sales ...dur dur dur"

Now I say microrape and you say:

"if $10x2 is microrape then what is $200 dur dur dur"

When you put on your rabid xbox fanboy hat your posts become retarded Digi. It's like watching someones IQ drop right in front of you.

Digi Smalls @ Jun 26th 2007 6:27PM

as high IQ an argument as "...you're stupid opinion, dur dur dur...." is cc123, i prefer arguments based on facts.

was 360 more feature complete (XBL vs. PSN) and cheaper (400 vs 600) than PS3 on its launch day? um, yes.

i said it then, i'll say it again, you don't like getting your own shit pointed out to you, that's all.

honestly, if you stopped spewing your puerile fanboy crap, i wouldn't have to make you aware of your own mess. it's really easy, want another example? hey, if i'm a fanboy, what's that make you?

see? easy.

.

cc123 @ Jun 26th 2007 6:31PM

Yeah great argument.

Just like when you were trying to excuse 360 sales for the first six months by saying it was "significantly supply constrained" yet the graph showed a straight line even after the six months.

"i prefer arguments based on facts. " Indeed.

Good job you dub fuck. lol

cc123 @ Jun 26th 2007 6:31PM

Digi Smalls @ Jun 26th 2007 6:38PM

see, that was still a fact. the 360 was supply constrained till March/April. ask any retailer.

my only point then was that as bad as you said 360 sales were, PS3's are still worse. then and now. more facts.

wish i wasn't so dub.

.

cc123 @ Jun 26th 2007 6:43PM

"my only point then was that as bad as you said 360 sales were, PS3's are still worse. then and now. more facts."

No. Same shit for both consoles during matching time periods during their life. Get your FACTS straight.

http://www.vgchartz.com/hwcomps.php?cons1=Wii®1=All&cons2=PS3®2=All&cons3=X360®3=All&align=1

Digi Smalls @ Jun 26th 2007 6:47PM

get yours: http://arstechnica.com/journals/thumbs.ars/2007/06/21/behind-the-flamewar-creator-of-vgchartz-speaks

"However, many have cast aside the numbers found on VGChartz as inaccurate. The merit and validity of the site's arithmetic has been under constant scrutiny and question since the site first launched."

good night. fanboy.

.

cc123 @ Jun 26th 2007 6:49PM

Oh for fucks sake. That was your gayest argument yet.

All vgchartz was doing is showing known 360 numbers from last year to known ps3 numbers for this year in a graph.

Your a joke.

Digi Smalls @ Jun 26th 2007 10:19PM

read that whole article in 2 minutes did'ya cc123?

if you had, you'd know vgchartz is extrapolated and purely for the fanboys. NPD are the closest things we have to facts in this industry.

i don't know why you brought this argument here, all you've done is prove "you're" a fanboy with a massive chip on your shoulder.

let it go man.

.

cc123 @ Jun 26th 2007 11:11PM

"i don't know why you brought this argument here, all you've done is prove "you're" a fanboy with a massive chip on your shoulder.

let it go man."

Riiiiight...See this really doesn't work since your the one that's been jumping on my ass and other peoples if they say anything pro-ps3/anti-360.

So get off your "fanboy" finger pointing and go look in the mirror you silly little bitch.

Digi Smalls @ Jun 26th 2007 11:54PM

if you want it to stop cc, just stop with dumb fanboy comments. say something smart.

busting "xbots" for not looking at 360 sales and then not considering the PS3s yourself (until asked) was dumb. citing a $20 expansion cost on Rainbow Six as "rape" when the PS3 is $200 more and just getting the game now, is dumb.

i have a PS3 cc123, it's OK to say bad things about it. it really is. just because i bought one doesn't mean i have to tow the company line. i can also say the 360 has a bad manufacturing rep and has overpriced peripherals (luckily optional). see, that's ok too.

fanboys come here to flame, and i out them for what they (you) are. plenty of smart discussions do happen here, they just don't usually have the words "rape" in them or the total brand-driven hypocrisy apparent in your posts.

call me whatever you want, but until you actually write something worth posting, you're saying way more about yourself than you are me.

.

cc123 @ Jun 27th 2007 12:11AM

And I've had a 360 since December and as a matter of fact I happen to like it. Have a Wii as well but that's a different matter...

You assumed I hated 360 when I don't. You jump on me when I call $20 for mappacks that the PS3 is getting for free rape (which it is). You can't even admit that the PS3 and 360 are selling the same for their respective periods which is pretty stupid considering the numbers are right there.

You can't admit that 360 sales are misreable when they are. You talk about worthwhile posts when you say dumb shit like "what's worse than miserable LOL".

All the makings of a rabid 360 fanboy...yet your the first one to point fingers at other people.

Just sell your PS3 and stfu already.

cc123 @ Jun 27th 2007 12:12AM

Oh and goodnight...had enough of your idiotic babble for one day.

So knock yourself out...

cc123 @ Jun 27th 2007 12:14AM

Oh and goodnight...had enough of your idiotic babble for one day.

So knock yourself out...

Digi Smalls @ Jun 27th 2007 12:31AM

remember, this all started with you pointing fingers and being guilty of what you accused people of.

my first post to you was a very reasonable question. you took it there (and now here), not me. bring a smart observation you'll get a good discussion. bring the fanboy rhetoric, then you reap what you sow.

.