| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (17)

Posted: Jun 28th 2007 5:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
so now he's gonna get politicians to be retarded for him?
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2007 5:40PM JY said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jack Thompson, when you signed that contract, you sold yourself out and lost. Let someone more competent crusade against video games, because you are nothing but a sore loser.
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2007 5:57PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
heh

He can always latch on to someone else

perhaps to 2K Games for BioShock, or to MMV for No More Heroes, or perhaps just hit on Bandai Namco for Jiggly Ivy...
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2007 6:05PM Burritoclock said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How Darkness didn't get an AO our the wrathe of Thompson I'll never understand. Manhunt 2 most be some insane shit, because The Darkness is brutal.

I'll also never understand why Take Two didnt just allow him to get disbarred....
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2007 6:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh, so he knows about the first amendment? Good.
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2007 6:14PM Sloar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually, Jack was pretty smart on that one. There's nothing Take-Two can do about him writing to his governor. As long as he's writing to his elected representatives, Take-Two's lawyers don't have a case. Now, if he started writing these letters to elected officials that are outside of his electoral district, he could potentially be in trouble. Well played Jack, well played.
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2007 6:43PM docstrange said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jack's interpretation of the 1st Ammendment is worse than the Bush Administration's.
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2007 6:54PM redspear said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well fortuanately(and I say this begrudgenly here) no settlement can ever and I mean ever prevent a person from expressing their point of view to an elected official. period. This is a good thing.
However slanderizing and a personal vandetta meant to harm or smear is different and not protected. Thompson walks this line with Take Two. he may be able to contact legal officials but he possibly may not be able to encourage them to take legal action or he violates his settlement.
It isn't exactly illegal to break an illegal settlement but that does not mean there are not consequences to doing so regardless of whether you are following your unremovable constitutional rights.
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2007 7:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Does anyone else feel like Jack Thompson is doing this for the same reason Rockstar makes their games. It's all for the controversy, if there wasn't any controversy in video-games Mr. Jack would probably just be some washed up politician fighting against the next controversy. He just wants the attention it gives him.
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2007 9:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't get what the picture of the nun is for?
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2007 8:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Could it be? Could I be agreeing with Thompson? Could the lude disregard for our rights as citizens shown here by some of the commenters display that people are more shallow than previously thought on this issue?
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2007 8:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@10,

When did Quaaludes come back in fashion? Send me some.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2007 2:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Every time this douche gets mentioned somewhere I smile, it amuses me that this guy is living proof that he himself is wrong...

where are all these game-addicted soulless killing machines when he's walking down the street or taking out the trash? Oh that's right, there aren't any...
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2007 2:34AM Altairio said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gotta side with JT on this one...man...up is down...white is black...everything seems so strange now.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2007 7:57AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, Jack Thomspon using the First Amendment in a legal defense. That's a larf. It reeally is.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2007 9:19AM hotpuck6 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just burn him alive.
seriously.
He's a disgrace to the practice of law.

It's one thing to use a loophole to save yourself from trouble, it's another to use it to continue being a whiney bitch.... even after you've been to court for the matter.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2007 11:05AM baby sea tuna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think the solution here is obvious. Just break Florida off and flush it into the Atlantic like the turd that it is.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW