| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (9)

Posted: Jul 13th 2007 5:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Im beginning to notice that the more hype a game receives from the video game "press," the more likely it is to suck when it actually comes out.

Funny thing is that reviewers never acknowledge they sucked this game's tit for eleven months before it came out, and when it hits they give it a weak review.

Re: Spider-Man 3: The Movie: The Game

Im betting highly that Assassin's Creed and Stranglehold here both suck monster balls, and Joystiq will deny ever having posted in the positive about them.
Reply

Posted: Jul 13th 2007 7:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
they could be super non-commital like x-play and bash the hell out of it for 5 minutes straight and then give it 4 steaming dog turds out of five. 3 is about par on xplay, and they give it out to everything. i've seen more shitty jrpgs get bashed to hell, then they say "but if you're a fan of x, x will be right up your alley ... which is why we give it 3 bisexual swordbearers out of five"
Reply

Posted: Jul 13th 2007 7:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What the bloody hell are you talking about man?!
Reply

Posted: Jul 13th 2007 9:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There's a world exclusive cover feature of Assassin's Creed in this months Official Playstation Magazine, UK. These guys have had hands on experience and they rate it very, very highly.

Some weird stuff mentioned though:-

"Here's the deal: there are nine people the Assassins want dead - nine bigwigs manipulating the Crusades for their own ends. There's a conspiracy to uncover a secret sect running the show from behind the scenes. And this conspiracy may well stretch out into the modern day and beyond . Early trailers hinted that the game might be about genetic memory - specifically a theory that our genes hold autobiographical information about our ancestors. In one infamous trailer shown last year, Altir is killed, the screen fades out and suddenly the player appears to be in a high-tech lab, looking at a computer screen that's telling him a genetic memory simulation has just ended. What does that mean? There has been a mass of specualation, but Ubisoft won't say anything. Then things get really strange. As Patrice (Desilets) guides Altair through the streets in front of us, certain characters he passes regularly glitch and break-up like hologrmas; around them strands of indecipherable data appear, scroll and blibk into the ether. We ask the obvious question. "We're not talking about that," laughs Jade (Raymond).

"Patrice wont divulge anything about the secret at the heart of Assassin's Creed - he and Jade won't even show us the game's HUD, which gives you handy information about enamies in your vicinity, including their line of sight - but it gives away something about the game we're not supposed to know. He's indiscreet though; at one point revealing that an earlier design for the game involved twin assassins - a male and female. Apparently, a dedicated co-op spin-off title is a definite possiblity. On that subject, there will be no multiplayer or co-op mode in this iteration of Assassin's Creed. It's sinlge-player only."

The first bit reminds me of Michael Crichton's 'Timeline'. This game will not suck anyway Tony!
Reply

Posted: Jul 15th 2007 7:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Strangely i've notices that when mags get "world exclusive reviews" they tend to ALWAYS rate the game very highly.

Even if it later turns out to be a complete piece of garbage. (and that they actually reviewed beta code).

I remember PC gamer UK giving the world exclusive of Jedi Outcast 9/10 or something crazy.

DO world exclusive reviews EVER get lass than 9/10??
Reply

Posted: Jul 14th 2007 12:49AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Theirs going to be a demo too!
Reply

Posted: Jul 13th 2007 6:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
From what I've read, Joystiq has praised this game the highest out of all the others.
Reply

Posted: Jul 13th 2007 6:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
E3 is like pre-season NFL. Right now, every single team "has a strong chance" of winning the Super Bowl. And then week 1 comes and goes. Although every single game at E3 always looks like a sure winner, we all know MOST of them are going to suck...the fun part is finding out which ones!
Reply

Posted: Jul 13th 2007 8:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
assuming you really are tony blair, i'll explain. X-Play is the title of a shitty videogame review show over here in the states on G4TV. The thing is, they hardly give bad reviews. they poke fun at a shitty game for the whole 5 minute review, then give it a middle-of-the-road review with three out of five stars. but they never say stars, they use some obscure comical element of the game instead ... like "and Dragon Ball Z Parliament gets 3 unpopular post-war Labour Prime Ministers ... out of five"

but my point is that they seem to rate everything at about the same, always wait for other reviewers to speak first, never going out on a limb
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW