| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (42)

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:09PM kinshadow said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"yummy gooey irony"

I think I saw that one. Not enough midgets.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mitt Romney for authoritarian 2008!!
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:12PM Lord Minogue said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It would be more effective to castrate everyone right after puberty and only give the reproductive organs back after passing a "fit for the human gene pool" test - which should be as difficult as the driver's test in Sweden.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:16PM Triforceowner said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*shudder* Oh please no.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ron Paul for President! Its either that or choose your authoritarian.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Either vote for Romney or You voting for Babies to drown. Make your choice... bring it on Romney you John Kerry wannabe you'll go so down in the general election it would be great
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hmm...a flip-flopping politician from Massachusetts. What's the worst that could happen?
(remembers John Kerry)
Ohh yeah...his campaign is screwed lol.
Reply

Posted: Jul 19th 2007 1:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
He wants less school shootings, less people to abuse drugs, and more morals in our society. Yeah, he definitely lost the support of all the people who care about more important things than video games. Because he doesn't want 10 year old Timmy to re-enact a murder he's soooo screwed... here's a shocker, any politician can be considered a flip flopper. Well, except Ronald Reagan. Reagan's God.
Reply

Posted: Jul 19th 2007 7:32AM Ghengis said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just keep telling yourself: one day, there will be Fred Thompson.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
He sounds like a robot.

Mit Romney is like the restaurant on the other side of town you never go to.
Hillary Clinton is like a cheeseburger.
Obama is like a nice steak
Reply

Posted: Jul 19th 2007 5:58PM KentuckyFrydCow28 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Actually, Hilary Clinton is more like a Grilled Cheese Sandwich. If you look inside of it, its all sticky and gooey and you would NEVER stick your penis in it.
Reply

Posted: Jul 19th 2007 12:09AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, except I've been to that restaurant. It's very trendy, calls itself "tapas" when they just charge you $35 for appetizers and call that a meal, has watered-down drinks, and probably gives you indigestion the next day.

That's what Mitt Romney as your chief executive is like.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Again they're assuming that the "ocean" was responsible for the actions of the shooters.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Or maybe do A REAL AD on REAL ISSUES....like how CNN reported that as many as 39% of all college graduates in America under 30 are EITHER under-employed or unemployed all together and this is causing many to postpone marriage, procreation, saving for retirement,etc etc until their 30s. How about that Mr. Mormon. I think that has a bigger effect on society then some kid see T&A on the computer which will probably see in real life once he gets to HS and the hormones really kick in!!!!!!!!!
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
This is a man who tied a dog in a carrier to the top of his car. This is a man who has asked for "double Guantanamo". This is a man who, among many of his peers, spent more time discussing fictional 24 terrorist situations as opposed to anything that is actually happening.

Essentially, I think the last thing the guy should be informing me of is normalcy and he's probably one of the last people I expect will actually do anything about it.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ron Paul wouldn't hurt our video games!!!!
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:41PM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The problem with both political parties is that they always want to give to the less fortunate!
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Pshhh, screw the less fortunate.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Cool, so now I know I'm not voting for Romney or Clinton. I can't wait to see who else wants to get crossed off my list!
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:55PM Sinth said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Romney is like the daily special at a restaurant that changes depending on what people are wanting that day. Hillary is like an over-cooked hamburger that is all shriveled up, nasty and hard to sink your teeth into. Obama is like a steak that was never cooked, and hopefully never will be. Remember the good ol' censoring days of Tipper Gore?
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 8:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
tipper did not censor she simply requested an "ingredient" label be put on media
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 10:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Romney is like the daily special at a restaurant that changes depending on what people are wanting that day."

Unfortunately, you can truthfully apply that analogy to most politicians.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:57PM Sinth said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"How about that Mr. Mormon" -- And the bigoted comments begin.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 8:06PM hoshin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey Mitt, that's great but I want MORE violence and MORE sex.

P.S. WTF is "pernagraphy"?

Love,
Puppies
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 8:10PM WedgeTalon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As a couple others have (briefly) said, Republican candidate Ron Paul won't mess with your video games. I urge anyone of voting age on this site to do some research on him.

He is against empire building. Wants to reduce taxes. He believes in privacy rights and personal responsibility.

Here is his appearance on G4's AotS:
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/videos/g4/
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 8:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
His Constitutional stance sounds nice, but I don't know how I feel about his opposition to net neutrality. I understand his reasoning, but the fact that one site is not favored over another for the average Internet user is something that is fundamental to the Internet. Even if the ISPs decide to start giving preference to sites that pay them, the Internet has become too vital for their to be a significant boycott of any sort.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 8:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*there
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 8:37PM WedgeTalon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
faceless coward: I agree. His stance towards net neutrality IS quite worrisome to me. From my thinking, if government does totally stay out of it, I think it would work out in the long term. The big question then would be what damage would be done in the short term. On the other hand, if we open the door to internet regulation, would THAT be a bigger can of worms in-and-of itself? It's a hard topic.

I ultimately believe, though, that he will do vastly more good than he could do harm.

Thanks, by the way, for your honest and thoughtful reply. It's quite refreshing when discussing politics. :)
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 8:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe this is just too obvious: inhaling water will kill you, regardless of how clean it is.

On a more serious note though: "I would like to see less sex and violence on TV" honestly so would I, I'm just not willing to give up freedom of speech in order to do so, and I don't see any way that the government can "clean up the ocean" without also becoming the thought police.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 8:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"Keep pornography from popping up on our computers?"

What kind of sick bastard would wish that?
The Internet is MEANT for PORN..(and music...and games.)
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 8:41PM FrankTheCrank said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mitt's all business. He doesn't give a crap about you or your society. As long as his haircut is good and his bank account is high, you can go f yourself.

PEOPLE WANT SEX, PEOPLE WANT DRUGS....LET THEM HAVE AT IT!!
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 8:51PM Vordus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Surely the only way to get rid of internet porn would be to ban it, then nuke the rest of the world. Then slaughter any survivors in case they have any lewd thoughts.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 9:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
so why shouldn't violent games be kept from kids? the truth is the industry will have to police it's self or the big brother will show up.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 10:32PM Wubbytoes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sure thing Mitt.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 10:52PM WedgeTalon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why not? He's gaining followers every day, has millions in contributions, holds many traditional-style Republican views. I firmly believe he has a viable bid, especially if interest in him continues to gain the rest of the year like it has thus far.

Also, he placed 2nd in the Utah straw poll (behind, of course, Romney). He placed FIRST in the New Hampshire straw poll with 65% of the votes, beating Guiliani (2nd place) who had 8%. Ouch.

I think he has a better bid than you want to give him.

As to why we like to post about him? Well, of course it is so others can get interested in him. I myself looked him up after reading a post about him on slashdot.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 10:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not sure the ad quite deserves the flames it is getting. I'm not willing to give up free speech for anything, but I'm don't believe Romney was calling for that in his ad. He wants less porn and blood in front of kids. That's cool. Come up with a solution that doesn't involve messing with my civil liberties...

As for the gooey irony, I don't see it either. The hotels provide adult entertainment for adults. The irony would exist if Mitt helped provide porn to schools.
Reply

Posted: Jul 18th 2007 11:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
i dont support the guy but wanting kids exposed to less pornography does not mean wanting to ban pornography for ADULTS (like the ones who can order it in hotels on their credit cards). i am a grown up, and i think its sad that any kid with an email address will definitely get porn in their mail box... but i also think any adult should be able to look at porn if they want.
Reply

Posted: Jul 19th 2007 2:35AM In A World said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ron Paul seems to be about a million times better than Mitt Romney, but I can't in good conscience vote for a Republican. I've learned over the past 7 years that the whole lot of them just can't be trusted. I guess if anyone out there reading this HAS to vote Republican, then let it be Ron Paul, otherwise anyone paying attention knows Barack Obama is the clear choice for '08.
Reply

Posted: Jul 19th 2007 2:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He is not a neo-con. In fact, if you look at his record, he will make almost all the dems look like neo-cons. This man is about principles, and he has stood by them for 20 years!
Reply

Posted: Jul 19th 2007 3:42AM In A World said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
zwarren69, I agree with you: Ron Paul seems fairly progressive on most issues. Likewise, Obama differs from most Democratic candidates (Edwards and Clinton are hypocrites who voted for the War while Obama was holding rallies protesting it), so I think America will be in good shape if our choice is between Paul and Obama. Either way we win.
Reply

Posted: Jul 19th 2007 8:32AM Ghengis said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why not? Maybe because Ron Paul has as much as said he thinks 9-11 was an "inside job". He's a conspiracy-monger, which to me says "nutjob". Plus his supporters really put me off.

They bought fredthompsonforum.com, rudyguilianiforum.com, and mittromneyforum.com, then they spam blog comments with the URLs pretending to support the title candidate, then they delete all the sane posts on the forum while adding shills with comments like, "I didn't know actually supports . But I've been looking around, and it turns out Ron Paul actually opposes . I'm going to have to look at Ron Paul some more." Astroturfers are usually not the first sign of a quality product (or politician).
Reply

Posted: Jul 19th 2007 1:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The ad fails on a number of points, primarily because it is a bunch of soft issues. No candidate would say they want to expose kids to more violence and sex and drugs. Just like no one would say they want more crime. The ad is a powder puff, and worse, the mixed metaphors are nonsensical.
Ideally, videogames should not be used as fluffer for candidates.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW