Gears of War also had some gruesome cranial explosions, but from what we saw at E3, Fallout 3 will up the ante in comical violence. The game isn't due out until Fall 2008.
Gears of War also had some gruesome cranial explosions, but from what we saw at E3, Fallout 3 will up the ante in comical violence. The game isn't due out until Fall 2008.
Reader Comments (22)
Posted: Jul 18th 2007 3:20AM (Unverified) said
I'm sorry, that ESRB logo is too pixelated. I am suing you.
Reply
Posted: Jul 18th 2007 4:00AM (Unverified) said
Damn. Fallout 3 looks exciting. I'm scared though.
Reply
Posted: Jul 18th 2007 3:39AM (Unverified) said
They need a new rating - ULTRA Headshot Mature.
Reply
Posted: Jul 18th 2007 4:05AM BananaBoat said
If this makes it to market, it proves that the whole Manhunt 2 controversy was just political theatre. Here's to hoping that it makes it
Reply
Posted: Jul 18th 2007 4:50AM (Unverified) said
Unfortunate super MUTANT, no zombies in the fallout universe if my memory serves me correctly.
Reply
Posted: Jul 18th 2007 5:05AM (Unverified) said
I'm glad that the level of violence will be on par with the first two games in this series. This once again shows Bethesda's dedication to the licence and hopefully help quell the fears of hard-core fans.
Reply
Posted: Jul 18th 2007 7:41AM (Unverified) said
On the other hand, gruesome deaths weren't all *that* common in Fallout - they only became so if you chose the "Bloody Mess" perk when you were creating their character. I remember one interview with a Bethesda developer, though, where they claimed that Fallout was all about that "Bloody Mess".
Bethesda seems to be trying to remain faithful to the Fallout license, but it's skewed by their opinions; they seem to like the flashy, surface aspects of the game and play them up, at the expense of the more sober, tragic, or intellectual aspects.
Reply
Bethesda seems to be trying to remain faithful to the Fallout license, but it's skewed by their opinions; they seem to like the flashy, surface aspects of the game and play them up, at the expense of the more sober, tragic, or intellectual aspects.
Posted: Jul 18th 2007 9:16AM (Unverified) said
What kinsman said. Ultra-violence != dedication.
Reply
Posted: Jul 18th 2007 6:52AM (Unverified) said
Glorious! It's going to be a long wait to Fall '08.
Reply
Posted: Jul 18th 2007 8:54AM (Unverified) said
The Elder Scrolls: Fallout. That actually could be really, really good.
Reply
Posted: Jul 18th 2007 8:57AM (Unverified) said
so was the Vault 0 experiment to only provide extra-large sized jumpsuits?
Reply
Posted: Jul 18th 2007 10:01AM (Unverified) said
of course it looks like armond christophe, it's probably modelled after the same guy working for bethesda!
Reply
Posted: Jul 18th 2007 10:47AM (Unverified) said
Zombies did exist in Fallout 1 & 2, while they where technically mutants, everyone called them zombies (they did as well).
Reply
Posted: Jul 18th 2007 12:24PM ZippyDSMlee said
Yes there were zombies,super zombies sounds dumb tho....,the zombies in FO 1 and 2 where where heavily mutated zombie looking humanoids,some where human more or less some where typical zombies *L*
Reply
Posted: Jul 19th 2007 3:00AM (Unverified) said
i never played the first ones, but this seems like an interesting scope, an enthralling rpg where you get to shoot. brilliant!!! hopefully you get to shoot alot.
we southerners like to shoot things ....
(i know .... its crazy, i don't even have an accent!)
Reply
we southerners like to shoot things ....
(i know .... its crazy, i don't even have an accent!)
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 221 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 161 comments
- Blizzard taking Valve to court over 'DOTA' trademark 117 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
