Rockstar to develop brand new franchise exclusively for PlayStation 3
Shortly before the show hit the tubes, SCEA's director of 3rd party relations, Michael Shorrock, confirmed this statement on the official US PlayStation blog adding, "Rockstar really wanted to make a game that you can truly only do on PS3, harnessing the power of CELL and Blu-ray disc and this deal lets them do just that.. This is really a win-win situation for both companies."
So what is it exactly? Sony has made an agreement with Rockstar to say no more concerning the deal nor the title involved. From a developer that has tackled everything from gang violence to ping pong, your guess is as good as ours.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
royce @ Jul 28th 2007 5:09AM
Cant wait for Rockstar Games Presents: Horseshoes, taking full advantage of the cell and the full power of the bluray capasity that only bluray can offer.
I thought Sony didnt pay for exclusives.
Anonim @ Jul 28th 2007 6:44AM
It will be Bowling with ultra realistic psyhics and Blu-ray will be harnessed by repeating each file 10 times to ensure adequate loading times with this super slow drive. 20GB for sure!
Unfortunately graphics will have to be cut - pity that PS3 has low end graphics card - slightly upgraded GF7600....
Stockpile @ Jul 28th 2007 8:07AM
@Anonim
Do your research first before making comments, you wont sound like such an idiot. Blu-ray is just as fast as a normal DVD, because of the way the data is on the disc it doesnt need to move as fast.
manic @ Jul 28th 2007 8:19AM
@Anonim
Nice to see you are so full of shit. The PS3 does not have a 7600. I know for a fact the PS3 uses AT LEAST an upgraded 7800GTX.
As for graphics, look at games such as Heavenly Sword, Killzone 2, Lair, Uncharted. Thats proof of PS3 capable of producing good graphics. The textures in Lair are brilliant. Joystiq also reported UT3 looks very similar if you compare the PC and PS3 version. Woah... the PS3 version looks on par with the PC version?
shawnpfiore @ Jul 28th 2007 11:20AM
I'm so sick of people making shit up. Here are links for PS3 and Xbox 360 graphic card comparisons. This should stop all bullshit. Clearly PS3 wins in the Graphic department. Just wait for Lair, then you see some real next gen graphics.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSX_%27Reality_Synthesizer%27
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenos
JonnyBoy2U @ Jul 28th 2007 11:27AM
At this point I have no idea who to believe when it comes to which system is more powerful graphically.
So I'm willing to settle for they're almost "evenly matched"
And Lair and Killzone 2 look like games that could be on the 360. In fact the only games that I can truly say looks absolutely amazing would be Heavenly Sword, Final Fantasy XIII, and MGS4.
shawnpfiore @ Jul 28th 2007 11:39AM
Your right, but on paper the PS3 is more powerful. Tell me this while I'm playing Gears, and I would say no way. I just want people to see the potential the PS3 really has. I feel like the power of my PS3 is laying dormant ready to feast after a long winters sleep.... LOL..
JonnyBoy2U @ Jul 28th 2007 11:49AM
You might very well be right man.
But then again it could all just be hype created by sony. And like Evan said on the next page the machine is hard to work.
Now b4 a sony troll attacks me I'd like to point out that I'm NOT a developer. I don't even work with videogames in any aspect. This is just based on what I've read on Joystiq, IGN, and other websites. And the general consensus I've gathered is that the ps3 is a hard machine to utilize when it comes to creating the awesome, latest, cutting edge graphics that the "most HARD hard core gamers" desire.
So what that suggests to me is that either
1) It really its a stubborn bitch that refuses to yield its goodies to developers.
OR
2) The goodies were never there to begin with. As in the "potential" doesn't exist and its just as powerful as the 360.
Once again I'd like to point out that I am merely speculating.
As of now it just seems like a bunch of hype from my POV. And in all honesty the difference between games like Gears of War on the 360 and Final Fantasy XIII on the ps3 truly don't make me desire the ps3. Its like the difference between a hotel that has a 4.8 star rating and the one next door that has a 5.0. I'm not going ot pay an extra 100 dollars for the room in the 5.0 star hotel if the 4.8 is JUST as good.
rfom @ Jul 28th 2007 5:15AM
Another 100-post thread! Isnt this whole exclusive thingy getting a bit too eventful to the point of being ridiculous? I can count about 20 such titles going from one platform to another or being multiplat - and its always strung out, with lots of semi-official snippets, fan wars, wailing and gnashing of teeth, etc etc. Well anyway, excellent news for PS3 though I am probably the only one who didnt like GTA:SA so not too excited...taking swipes at each other
JonnyBoy2U @ Jul 28th 2007 11:24AM
LMAO...I find your predication hilarious since its most definitely going to come true.
Purple Haze @ Jul 28th 2007 5:19AM
I laughed when heard that guy say Killzone 2 would move hardware.
Djuan @ Jul 28th 2007 5:24AM
Wow, people love flaming Sony lately - even when they get genuinely good news!
To the inevitable "I thought Sony didn't pay for exclusives" commenters, consider the following before you write what you're destined to:
1) The platform that had a major hand in boosting Rockstar's popularity in the first place is the PlayStation 2.
2) They could've been held back by the storage limitations of a single DVD with GTAIV.
3) Sony could likely give them the best, most up-to-date tools they have. Since Rockstar likes to push the boundaries of hardware AND social norms, that could likely be a deal too good to pass up.
Any one of those reasons could be valid excuses for Rockstar deciding to make a PS3 exclusive title. Hell, it took YEARS before Grand Theft Auto 3 left the PS2.
So let's try to keep this civil, shall we? Keep in mind, this is coming from someone who owns a Wii, 360, and PS3. 360 and Wii both have tons of exclusives - let Sony have this one in stride...
lawrence @ Jul 28th 2007 5:26AM
playstation returns with rockstars and sony destroy the 360
royce @ Jul 28th 2007 5:33AM
Nothing that Rockstar has done, that wasn't called GTA has been a system seller. This isn't an exclusive GTA game so I think the xbox will be ok for now.
Stevo @ Jul 28th 2007 9:18AM
Royce-- you and I are on the same page here. I've never gotten into any game Rockstar has made other than GTA. Maybe PS3 owners will get a huge strike of fortune w/ this new IP...but I'd say it's too early to tell until Rockstar talks about it more in depth.
E.J. @ Jul 28th 2007 5:27AM
And I thought Sony didn't (need to) buy exclusives...
Great news for PS3 owners though.
Chainblast @ Jul 28th 2007 6:14AM
They still probably don't. Paying to have another company's IP on your system first or period is different from hiring a studio to create/develop a new IP that is your property. Heavenly Sword, Lair, Resistance, Uncharted: Drake's Fortune, Littlebigplanet are all newly created independently developed Sony owned IP's.
Perhaps this is what Rockstar is doing. Though it I wouldn't put it passed SCE to backtrack. They've done a whole lot in July alone.
manic @ Jul 28th 2007 5:34AM
Honestly, if Sony received ANY of the negative news that the 360 has, they would be absolutely murdered by the gaming media, and you guys.
Talk about double standards, eh?
Why does everyone absolutely hate the PS3/Sony? Jealousy?
AzaMcWazza @ Jul 28th 2007 5:53AM
For the same reason we used to hate Nintendo - they were arrogant dickwads.
sheppy @ Jul 28th 2007 12:53PM
Yes, yes, yes, they were arrogant dickwads. Uh huh. And Jack Tretton is an asshat. Kuturugi is crazy, blah blah blah. Get a job.
EVERY company is arrogant. Nintendo still is arrogant. Or have you not heard the snippets like "at least no one got killed during our launch" jokes from Reggie and Kaplan. Shortly after the Wii death as well.
Whoever is in first place will remain the most egotistical. Period. Do you REALLY think Nintendo has returned to their preDS launch ways of being humble? Nope. They are back to talking shit like nobodies business. Except when this camp does it, it's called "Regginator taking names."
And Microsoft... Microsoft has been nothing BUT arrogance. J Allard, Peter Moore.... from those two alone you could fill a coffee table quote book on their competition. But once again, nobody jumps it.
Phil Harrison says he thinks the things they offer on PSN are competitive with XBL and everyone takes the "the fuck?!? He just said he was better than XBL!" and jump on that for a 300 response thread.
Except for a few notable exceptions (Jack Tretton mainly), Sony has been shaken and quite humbled by the PS3s lack of stellar performance. And each passing month, we don't hear from them how they are number one, we hear how they plan to change things in the future. I mean, of the three, Sony is currently the MOST humble. Granted, should they pull PS3 ahead, I don't expect that aspect to stay. But at least they weren't describing their holiday lineup as a Perfect Storm.
Tom @ Jul 28th 2007 6:27AM
The validity of this story will be called into question, proven false, and eventually revoked by Sony within the next week.
We're told time and time again about how this game or that game is exclusive, not exclusive, exclusive, not exclusive again, there is no price cut, rumble is last gen, etc etc. So, if these people continually lie to us, why should we believe anything they say?
PSN: ummfada @ Jul 29th 2007 9:31AM
blog.us.playstation.com Any questions?
afr @ Jul 28th 2007 6:56AM
they should have announced this at E3, that would have been a huge kick in the nuts for Microsoft, and it would have been forefront news
Kye @ Jul 28th 2007 6:56AM
My two pence/cents.
J.Goodwin @ Jul 28th 2007 7:22AM
So, um, has anyone bothered getting a quote from Rockstar?
Why am I only seeing Sony mouthpiece quotes?
Manic Inc @ Jul 28th 2007 7:23AM
Is it being developed or just published by R*? I wonder what team would be making it. The only ones I can see who aren't busy are Rockstar London and Rockstar Toronto, who'll both be free after Manhunt 2 is wrapped up. Seeing as Toronto also did Max Payne and the Warriors, they might have a good chance of something great if it's them.
Could also be Vancouver once they've done the 360 version of Bully. Whoever it is, should be nice.
Trenchalicious @ Jul 28th 2007 7:26AM
Rockstar presents Auto Stealer I
Evan @ Jul 28th 2007 7:55AM
That video spins it like an exchange, a new IP in exchange for losing GTA IV, but in reality it's more like a consolation prize. An exclusive new IP, that may or may not be a hit, to be released possibly too far into the future to save the PS3, in no way makes up for losing exclusivity to a highly anticipated sequel to one of the best selling series in recent history!
Adam @ Jul 28th 2007 8:08AM
Well...watch the video, he says Take 2...not Rockstar. Take 2 publishes for more than just Rockstar.
Until Rockstar says anything there's no news here.
Ben Hobbs @ Jul 28th 2007 8:40AM
It will be a HD movie
JonnyBoy2U @ Jul 28th 2007 8:49AM
I'll wait till Rockstar or Take Two themselves says something.
And even then like previous people have mentioned nothing outside the GTA series has even approached system seller status.
So in the end I don't see this being a huge deal. Especially since its coming from the mouth of a liar and an idiot.
Curmeo @ Jul 28th 2007 9:17AM
"Especially since its coming from the mouth of a liar and an idiot."
hey, looks like Jack Tretton and JonnyBoy2U have something in common.
JonnyBoy2U @ Jul 28th 2007 9:29AM
Oh look its the sony troll...
Your insults would actually mean something if it weren't coming from I dunno...YOU.
You're a complete joke. Its funny how you seem obsessed with me now. Out of all the comments in this thread you decide to reply to mine. Why is that I wonder?
Could it be because you're threatened by me. Someone who actually thinks before they post. I haven't said anything out of the ordinary when it comes to this story or the people involved.
Why don't you stay on your side of the fence and return to NOT replying. Just so I don't have to put up with your stupidity.
Curmeo @ Jul 28th 2007 9:33AM
you just proved my point, nice.
JonnyBoy2U @ Jul 28th 2007 9:40AM
What point? You just wanted to flame me..thats all. And its quite pathetic how your life is fixated on constantly reply to my posts in some lame attempt to make me angry or less informed....
Once again just don't reply to my posts. Its clear that we'll never agree on anything so why do you constantly try to start shit? If you have nothing positive, no constructive criticism, and nothing to discuss with me about then just mind your own business. Instead of trying to start fanboy wars at the crack of dawn. Unless Jack is your dad or some kinda kin to you I don't see why your attacking me.
Especially since he has lied before in the past.
AG23 @ Jul 28th 2007 10:37AM
@JonnyBoy2U
You called out Curmeo for being a Sony "Troll", yet you are the one who flames every single PS3 news topic with about a dozen or so posts about how the PS3 sucks. Kind of ironic, isn't it?
For the last damn time, Why the hell are you commenting in the PS3 news if you do not like the PS3 or plan on purchasing one and what did you call Curmeo again?
Do you always feel the need to try and make out your system of preference to be the better choice?
License to ill @ Jul 28th 2007 1:18PM
Jonnyboyu2=troll
zwarrior @ Jul 28th 2007 9:00AM
Manhunt was suppose to be their next "big" franchise too. Let's face it, GTA is and will remain Rockstar's one and only big franchise.
Curmeo @ Jul 28th 2007 9:12AM
good news for the 4.5 million plus PS3 owners out there. games that utilize the Cell processor properly will show the true power of the PS3.
Griffin @ Jul 28th 2007 9:28AM
Watched that gamerhead show. Are all Americans as dumb as those guys on the Sofa?
The $499 PS3 pricetag is here to stay, there is absolutley NO evidence to suggest than there won't be anything to replace the 60GB PS3 when those stocks run low (in all likelyhood a bare 80GB, with no motorstorm, and perhaps an extra game and controller in the 80GB %599 pack to bring it inline with Europe)
JonnyBoy2U @ Jul 28th 2007 9:31AM
Its 3.89 million dumbass according to vgchartz which although isn't perfect is pretty close.
Curmeo @ Jul 28th 2007 9:37AM
its 4.5 million sold, bubba. check: http://www.ps3fanboy.com/2007/07/26/playstation-3-hits-4-5-million-sales-worldwide/
you're starting to sound dumber than Jack Tretton! and before you fart again, its 4.5 million sold, not shipped.
JonnyBoy2U @ Jul 28th 2007 9:42AM
Wow...look at where you get your stats from.
Thats all I'm gonna say.
Blizz4l9 @ Jul 28th 2007 10:46AM
i would take VGChartz over PS3 FanBoy numbers any day, but i also haven't looked to see what there source is either, and even if they do have 4.5 mil they still got a ways to go to catch up to either of the competition and probably never will Sony is just gonna have accept 3rd place this gen i think and hey if they survive and stay in the game they will probably be a better company after sometimes a lil slap in the face as a reminder that there not God is all it takes to put things on the right track.
Rare Hare @ Jul 28th 2007 1:52PM
"4.5 million sold"
"ZOMG NO IT'S NOT U LOOZER. 3.89 MILLION DUH."
wtf guys? give me a break.
rfom @ Jul 28th 2007 9:31AM
hmm..this doesnt sound like a M$ style big-money shopping - probably not much money involved. This may be something like FF7 on PS1 - they genuinely need a lot of space for a truly epic sandbox game, which only BR can provide. Anyway, Sony has been VERY smart in terms of excluives - picking up unknown developers like Guerilla and Ninja, using the Halo 3 hype to get timed exclusivity on Haze and UT3 for free - means that this xmas PS3 has a better shooter lineup as Haze + UT3 + Warhawk > Halo 3.
Digi Smalls @ Jul 30th 2007 1:16PM
what makes you think these timed excluisves were free or that this rockstar agreement required "little money" ?
you really are living in a sony dreamland.
Sony is a mega company who also does videogames just microsoft. they buy exclusivity agreements and FAMOUS developers just like microsoft.
insomniac, factor 5, naughty dog were all much more famous than bungie at the time of their purchase, so stop making things up you wish were true.
wake up.
.
Jnas @ Jul 28th 2007 9:43AM
Rofl Johnnyboy2u, you're quite a moron if you take vgchartz numbers to heart.
JonnyBoy2U @ Jul 28th 2007 9:48AM
Umm if you actually read my post I did say they were NOT perfect. I just find it funny that he quoted stats taken from ps3fanboy and from sony themselves.
4.5 is a far cry from what other websites are saying...
And really in the end it doesn't matter since both numbers are way under the 360 and way under the Wii. And we'll see how they do over the next few months.
The main point here is that Curmeo has now not only decided to only post using my User Name fake bullshit on this website but also start flame wars with me every chance he gets.
morganfell @ Jul 28th 2007 10:43AM
Oh, I see jonny. If the quote comes from Sony then it is a lie when not backed up by the publisher. But MS can claim moon cheese all day long and you are fine with that. I wouldn't have an issue with your moronic comments except that they are aimed only at Sony. You refuse to indict MS on anything. Fanboy. MS has stood up and blatantly lied and cost people how much money and how many hours of lost gaming. They say they know what the problem is buit they won't tell anyone.
I am waiting on you and you alone. Your come uppance is enroute. The fact is the aging technology in the 360 is starting to show itself. Rockstar themselves had issue with no HDD and only standard DVD in the 360. You know, when they were working on GTA IV. As we enter 2008 more bitching is going to start to arise related to storage limitations.
It is also ignorant that you wrongly believe a company can only have on hit franchise. Remember your ranting and raving over table tennis on the 360? Shut up already hypocrite. PS3 fanboy is owned by Jostiq. So they are not credible but joystig is? Particularly when joystiq carried their stories? Idiot.
You are a slag that is so threatened by the fact that the PS3 is a gathering storm and everyone can see it except the hopeless lemmings. The 360 has some great grade AAA titles. But the times are evolving and the humor is going to be your inability to show your face in the near future. Only a moron is incapable of seeing what is happening. At the top of its game, developers and publishers are starting to make eyetoy like comments about the Wii. Where will that lead. By eyetoy comments I mean "What is left to do on a machine that can't push the technological envelope". FPS titles are not the biggest seller but everyone makes them.
Why? Because it isn't always about the money. There may be a Wii craze but a lot of companies want to break ground and the PS3 will be the place for that. I guess it is beyond the feeble grasp of some minds to understand that they want to raise the bar in a way they couldn't in GTA IV due to limitations. Your loss, not ours.
The best part of this is you are going to get exactly what you deserve. Quoting VGChartz was an act of lunacy then you try and save face by saying it wasn't accurate. Sorry, too late to back peddle. It serves to demonstrate you knew it wasn't true. That means you will sling any amount of mud to win your fanboy war. Pathetic. What you are saying is the truth doesn't matter to you. Quoting them as a source and then acknowledging the innacuracy means you are admitting to being a liar. What else is new.