| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (13)

Posted: Aug 3rd 2007 11:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This seems to be the summer of delays. i swear....everything is getting delayed!
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2007 11:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That virus is called Halo 3. It makes game companies wise up and release their games somewhere outside of Seotember 25th.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2007 11:49AM Magic Whiskey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Someone at Nintendo is infecting these game developers. Has anyone seen Perrin Kaplan recently?

Perhaps Nintendo is putting the 'organized' kibosh on these developers.

Mario IS Italian, after all.

Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2007 12:01PM Magic Whiskey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To be serious for a moment, Dustin..I think I know what really is causing these 'delays', at least in part: E3. Here's my reasons why I'm a think this.


This is the first year E3 was held so late into the year compared to prior shows, and the schedules of publishers have gone perquacky. They assumed that, with more time to work on the retail build of games and less emphasis put on big demos to create for E3, of course the workload would run smoother and the final games would hit shelves sooner. Apparently that's not exactly what's happened, and at least two publishers now have proven that.

OF COURSE...maybe internal news to publishers has been released of just exactly how many Halo 3 reserves have been taken by retailers, and schedules have been shrinking back in time like a frightened turtle, or George Costanza in a cold swimming pool.
Halo 3 is a monster, whether the game itself turns out to be better than Halo 2 or not. Games cost insane bank anymore to produce, and distancing themselves for 4-8 weeks from another big IP might ultimately make that company more revenue in the long run. It could also be a great thing for gamers; let's say Halo 3 does, for whatever reason, suck eggs. Well, we can take time to bicker and moan about it as we wait in social circles for other titles, and the next big thing. Anymore, fame in general really IS a 'flash in the pan', and NO GAME is immune to that.



But it could also be that Perrin Kaplan really IS sabotaging competitor game publishers with her feminine wiles, but we may never know..
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2007 12:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm tired of it. Let's not announce a release date until a product is actually ready for release. Or how about making statements like "planned release sometime Fall '07" rather than announcing (in the case of Two Worlds) July 21, no wait July 31, uh-oh there's a problem how's Aug. 14? Oh wait, damn, does Aug. 21 work for you? Lets just call it the end of August and see how that goes.

It's ridiculous. The damn things are out when theyre out so stop setting phantom dates. I'm sure it's just to build hype, a sense of urgency and create more pre-orders. Well, that might work for a while but sooner or later the industry is going to piss off the customers enough so that maybe we'll come waltzing into GameStop a week or two after release to see if somethings in.

Dont even get me started on release date/street date crap. WTF.

Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2007 12:07PM Magic Whiskey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ 5.

No game has ever, ever really stuck hard and fast to a supposed release date that was announced months prior. Hell, sometimes games get pushed back DAYS BEFORE release! It's a pessimistic world to live in as a gamer..


I always expect the worst, and hope for the best in terms of release dates. GTA IV reminded me I should keep thinking that. I mean, go back and check out the legacy of anything to do with Sony's Gran Turismo..now THERE'S a publisher that should keep their mouths SHUT! They announce release dates that turn out to be YEARS different. Ask any hardcore fan of the PSP and they'll just cry...

With that said, Blacksite: Area 51 will come out any time between September 2007 and September 2010. hahaha! (Oh, my ribs.)
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2007 12:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Did I read that right, October is before November, and October is the Europe launch. There must be a disease of some form.

And it is clearly the Halo, or rather the Flood, that is causing the delays.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2007 12:28PM Magic Whiskey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Cortana is corrupting the gamecode. End of line.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2007 1:29PM ccc said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well well looks like another game pushed back. They better fix the choppyness I saw in the demo of this game. Poor framerate indeed midway. As far as delaying it for Halo 3's sake, I highly doubt that Midway would feel this game has any better chance selling the month of November with Mass Effect swimming in the waters.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2007 6:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bummer, I was looking forward to this game in a month's time. Hope I'll still be kanoodlin' with Stranglehold and Bioshock into Sept.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2007 11:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"That virus is called Halo 3. It makes game companies wise up and release their games somewhere outside of Seotember 25th."

Beat me to it. :) That's all it is, srsly.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2007 12:30AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ditto, Tinman
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2007 10:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, on the subject of Halo and release dates. It seems that Bungie have always been correct on all their release dates. If, for those who purchased the collectors edition of halo 2 and watched the "Behind the Scenes" footage, you would know that almost 2-3months before shipping the game, Bungie was all pissed, and tired, and working as hard as they could, cause they had to hurry up and finish the game to stop all the crying halo fanatics who wanted to play that game ASAP!!!!

What ended up happening, was that because they waited to the last minute (or last month), to finish up the cinematics and story campaign for the game, that they quickly cut about 15-20% of what they had hoped to tell in Halo 2 for the campaign, and because the Multiplayer was 100% completed, and running well, and being tested constantly by huge groups to point out the bugs, the Multiplayer for Halo 2 was awesome, and the campaign, kinda... sorta... sucked.

I dunno about the rest of you, cause I am a Halo fanatic, but I just dont want to see a game like Halo 3 (or in these delayed cases GTA IV, Area 51, etc.) be rushed too quickly and have 50% awesome, and the other half not so great.

Id rather have Bungie learn from their mistakes from Halo 2, primarily on the Campaign, Multiplayer is a given, it will rock on Halo 3, but seeing as how this is where we all "Finish the Fight", and its the last game for the triogy, and because Master Chief dies(LOL!!!!, Gotcha.), I have high hopes for the Campaign of this game, and hope all the cinematics and gameplay will come together to create one, huge ending.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW