Activision and EA traded a few barbs with each other over this fall's Battle of the Brands, pitting upstart Rock Band against stalwart Guitar Hero III, over at GameDaily BIZ. Their arguments are about what you'd expect, with Activision saying that Rock Band isn't accessible enough and EA saying that Rock Band is, in fact, so very accessible that it makes handicap ramps look more like ramparts.
While they're busy towing the company line, we're a little more interested in where you stand on the issue. Will you be venturing into the unknown? Or will you dance with who brought you, so to speak? Will you do both? Or, will you be like us and abandon both in favor of the secret dark horse: I Can Play Guitar.
Reader Comments (70)
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 1:01PM (Unverified) said
I was leaning towards Rock Band...
Now I'm evenly split.
In the end I'll probably splurge and just get both games...
Reply
Now I'm evenly split.
In the end I'll probably splurge and just get both games...
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 1:06PM (Unverified) said
Rock Band if it's not too expensive... GH3 if it is... but let's be realistic - I'll probably get both
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 1:07PM (Unverified) said
I'm not going to get either when they 1st come out... TOO MANY FALL GAMES!!! I think I'll eventually get both though. Just depends... I might wait for rock band to drop in price...
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 1:08PM Stevorino said
I loved Guitar Hero 2-- but I wasn't too impressed with the DLC for it and it doesn't seem to be doing anything new with GH3.
I'm very impressed with how Rock Band is taking this genre to the next level and hope it fulfills the potential. If executed well and the price is reasonable, I'll be rocking out w/ Rock Band this holiday season.
Reply
I'm very impressed with how Rock Band is taking this genre to the next level and hope it fulfills the potential. If executed well and the price is reasonable, I'll be rocking out w/ Rock Band this holiday season.
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 1:09PM (Unverified) said
I'll probably go with Rock Band, I've done the guitar hero thing and this would be a nice change, hopefully the guitars are compatible.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 1:10PM (Unverified) said
I think I'll be in the minority and pick neither. I cannot possibly imagine paying around $200 to form a fictional band playing cover tunes. I'll just go to my local bar if I want that action. Or form my own band and actually play some real music. And Guitar Hero 3? Meh, same formula, Activision might be turning GH into Tony Hawk and that doesn't sound like a bright future...
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 9:13PM (Unverified) said
I agree. I already shelled out $800+ for a real guitar, and a real drum set. I'll let one of my friends buy it, and i'll freeload off of them.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 1:15PM (Unverified) said
Wow, I just went to that I Can Play Guitar website. That's absolutely ridiculous. It looks harder to play than a real guitar, the damn thing costs $100 for the hardware alone, and the software is $15 each. With the level of complication to play, the sheer price of the thing, and the fact that it doesn't look like any fun whatsoever, any parent who buys that instead of a real guitar is a moron. Making this even more hilarious, the website advertises it as being something to help you learn to play guitar. There is just... there's no reason to get this over a real guitar, unless you're the kind of parent that totally spoils their children and gives them everything they ask for.
Also, did you hear those synths? OUCH.
Reply
Also, did you hear those synths? OUCH.
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 1:17PM (Unverified) said
rockband has drum hero,guitar hero,and sing hero IN ONE!
im still buying gh3 but only the disk.drums for rockband and guitar for it eventually =D
Reply
im still buying gh3 but only the disk.drums for rockband and guitar for it eventually =D
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 1:20PM (Unverified) said
I'm choosing Guitar Hero 3 over Rock Band simply because I want to buy a game,not a platform.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 1:19PM ForTheHuynh said
Getting both. Which is sad since I actually can play guitar....
But these games are more awesome than my old six string anyways.
Reply
But these games are more awesome than my old six string anyways.
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 1:27PM (Unverified) said
GHIII might just be another cash-in like Rocks the 80's, or Activision might try to hard to make GH there own and mess it up.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 1:43PM (Unverified) said
If for some reason I could only get one then Rock band all the way. It's a no brainer. Assuming you can't afford the whole $200 or so dollars you could just get the game + guitar for roughly the same price as GHIII, enjoy some GHIII type gameplay and even go online for some band action. Then as you get money add the drums and enjoy the drum part, online, and play with a friend, then add the mic and so on so on.
The godawful DLC situation with GHII (I was never bothered by the price, I am bothered by the GH1 songs and hardly anything being released) and then the ripoff of Rock the 80's (which I bought and enjoyed but was a gigantic ripoff cash grab) has soured me to Red Octane. I will still buy GHIII because I can afford it, but I may not get the guitar.
Reply
The godawful DLC situation with GHII (I was never bothered by the price, I am bothered by the GH1 songs and hardly anything being released) and then the ripoff of Rock the 80's (which I bought and enjoyed but was a gigantic ripoff cash grab) has soured me to Red Octane. I will still buy GHIII because I can afford it, but I may not get the guitar.
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 2:12PM (Unverified) said
the gh guitars (on 360) will work on rockband =)
now im assuming,the ps3 gh3 guitar will work on rockband too.
Reply
now im assuming,the ps3 gh3 guitar will work on rockband too.
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 1:44PM (Unverified) said
Awesome pic.
This game is great if you don't know how to play a guitar. But I'd rather pick up the real thing. Its more fun.
Reply
This game is great if you don't know how to play a guitar. But I'd rather pick up the real thing. Its more fun.
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 1:47PM (Unverified) said
ooops...THESE GAMES I mean.
I may have to eat my words and cop GH3. Slash endorsed. Nuff said.
Reply
I may have to eat my words and cop GH3. Slash endorsed. Nuff said.
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 1:51PM (Unverified) said
This IS excatly what I wanted to happen!! Red Octane gave the BIG Middle Finger to ALL of the fan's who went out bought the 360 version based on the promises that they made!! Now R/O has to step it up because their monopoly on the Genre is over!!
I couldn't be happier, I hope Rock Band is a s GREAT as it looks and takes what they have learned from R/O's screw-up's and gives back to the fan's (i.e. DLC that doesn't rip you off!!) I'll be buying GHIII used so R/O doesn't make any money on it!!
Reply
I couldn't be happier, I hope Rock Band is a s GREAT as it looks and takes what they have learned from R/O's screw-up's and gives back to the fan's (i.e. DLC that doesn't rip you off!!) I'll be buying GHIII used so R/O doesn't make any money on it!!
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 2:51PM (Unverified) said
Sorry to rain on your parade pal but have you think on what will happen if Rock Band takes the control?,what makes you so sure that when they beat GH3 they wont milk us with DLC as well?.
Also R/O would take the money of the guy who sold you the used copy anyway.
BTW I believe you people are crying to much about the DLC,It sucked anyway it was for the people that like crappy songs.
Reply
Also R/O would take the money of the guy who sold you the used copy anyway.
BTW I believe you people are crying to much about the DLC,It sucked anyway it was for the people that like crappy songs.
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 3:47PM (Unverified) said
Word of the Street,
The difference is that the person that you're buying GH3 from has already bought the game. Nothing can change that. Whether you choose to buy the game used, new, or not at all, that person has already bought the game. By buying the game used, you are not giving Activision and RO any money, but you are playing the game. That makes the publishers angry as hell, because they view it as you taking advantage of their work without giving them compensation.
Of course, this is the way things have always been. People have sold each other used wagons and unused food. A used optical disc is no different. However, the makers of wagons and fresh food never lobbied to make it so that once you bought their item, you could never, ever sell it again. That's the difference with modern media companies, and why they should all be put out of business. I'm a very capitalist guy. That's why I hold this view. It is essential to have ownership, for it is the cornerstone to capitalism. Even competition, as utterly important as it is, is secondary to ownership. If you can't resell the item, you never truly owned it in the first place. Media companies want to take away all ownership rights of the consumer, and it is for *rare* instances like this that the government should intervene to keep our system on track. Of course, the government doesn't intervene for matters essential to captialism, but instead choose to intervene when a crappy airline reaps its just rewards of being poorly managed or when a bunch of idiot mortgage agents get burned by giving loans with huge interest to people who can't possible afford it. Typical government crap.
Reply
The difference is that the person that you're buying GH3 from has already bought the game. Nothing can change that. Whether you choose to buy the game used, new, or not at all, that person has already bought the game. By buying the game used, you are not giving Activision and RO any money, but you are playing the game. That makes the publishers angry as hell, because they view it as you taking advantage of their work without giving them compensation.
Of course, this is the way things have always been. People have sold each other used wagons and unused food. A used optical disc is no different. However, the makers of wagons and fresh food never lobbied to make it so that once you bought their item, you could never, ever sell it again. That's the difference with modern media companies, and why they should all be put out of business. I'm a very capitalist guy. That's why I hold this view. It is essential to have ownership, for it is the cornerstone to capitalism. Even competition, as utterly important as it is, is secondary to ownership. If you can't resell the item, you never truly owned it in the first place. Media companies want to take away all ownership rights of the consumer, and it is for *rare* instances like this that the government should intervene to keep our system on track. Of course, the government doesn't intervene for matters essential to captialism, but instead choose to intervene when a crappy airline reaps its just rewards of being poorly managed or when a bunch of idiot mortgage agents get burned by giving loans with huge interest to people who can't possible afford it. Typical government crap.
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 1:56PM willsan said
Rock Band for sure. I am planning on Getting a PS3 just for this game (well and to watch Blue-ray movies) drums for me is the Killer app.
I may pick up Guitar hero III for the PS2. I am not all that crazy about the song list but my wife loves Slash so we will probably end up with a copy.
Reply
I may pick up Guitar hero III for the PS2. I am not all that crazy about the song list but my wife loves Slash so we will probably end up with a copy.
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 1:58PM WedgeTalon said
That would be "TOEing the company line", not "TOWing". You are not hauling the line anywhere.
/Sorry, couldn't resist my inner grammar nazi. :(
Reply
/Sorry, couldn't resist my inner grammar nazi. :(
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 2:07PM (Unverified) said
4 players? online? drums? cowbell?
i think we have a winner already
neversoft is going to butcher the guitar hero franchise... who wants to bet tony hawk somehow make and appearance?
Reply
i think we have a winner already
neversoft is going to butcher the guitar hero franchise... who wants to bet tony hawk somehow make and appearance?
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 2:45PM (Unverified) said
If you ask me it needs more Cowbell,Everything need MOAR COWBELL.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 2:13PM Wickerman22 said
I'm picking up both. GHIII mainly just to pick some achievements and hold me over until Rock Band. Unless there's some bombshell announcement about Rock Band coming out much sooner than rumored and/or GHIII coming out later than expected. Then I'll have a dilemma, but Rock Band is a guaranteed purchase for me.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 2:15PM HeyApples said
Wow, the comments really surprise me. I was fully expecting the cheapskates to knock RB on price and the lemmings to pick GH3 on the name alone.
And yet, Rock Band is getting more than it's due worth of positive comments. There is hope for gaming masses yet. Guitar Hero stands to become the Madden of rhythm games and people are onto it!
Reply
And yet, Rock Band is getting more than it's due worth of positive comments. There is hope for gaming masses yet. Guitar Hero stands to become the Madden of rhythm games and people are onto it!
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 2:18PM (Unverified) said
I'm getting Guitar Hero 3
Because I have no friends
Reply
Because I have no friends
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 2:25PM (Unverified) said
since I have a Wii guess I gotta get guitar hero.
Also that picture is cool, and by cool, I mean totally sweet.
Reply
Also that picture is cool, and by cool, I mean totally sweet.
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 2:29PM (Unverified) said
I'll get both because they both have something unique to offer. Rock Band is what guitar hero was, but with more instruments. GH3 is taking the same formula and expanding it with the battle modes and online play and the like. They'll both be fun, especially so with a group of friends.
It's all about having good songs and making sure they're tracked out well. I just hope that Activision konws this and isn't just looking to cash in. That's what the 80's edition felt like to me. Bad covers of mediocre songs, most of which were poorly tracked... no thanks.
Reply
It's all about having good songs and making sure they're tracked out well. I just hope that Activision konws this and isn't just looking to cash in. That's what the 80's edition felt like to me. Bad covers of mediocre songs, most of which were poorly tracked... no thanks.
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 2:52PM (Unverified) said
what's the problem here? I'll buy both (game only) and have a huge ass library of songs by then.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 2:43PM (Unverified) said
Guitar hero III because I'm 1 person short from Rock band,I mean what kind of band doesnt have a drummer/Singer.
Also I dont like the idea of paying for the controllers of other people.
Reply
Also I dont like the idea of paying for the controllers of other people.
Posted: Aug 9th 2007 2:57PM (Unverified) said
You could just get Rock Band and a guitar for yourself. At that point, you have Guitar Hero... but with the additional benefit of being able to go online (if you want) and play with others in a band type experience.
Also, later on, you can get drums and have a whole new game. Same with mic.
Reply
Also, later on, you can get drums and have a whole new game. Same with mic.
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
Dark Side 'Cause It Looks Cool: The Failings of Moral Choice in Games
Posted on Feb 10th 2012 7:45PM
GameStop sees majority of digital sales from cash; won't pursue used PC game sales
Posted on Feb 10th 2012 5:45PM
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 221 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 155 comments
- Blizzard taking Valve to court over 'DOTA' trademark 110 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments







