| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (26)

Posted: Aug 11th 2007 8:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report

Interesting. The line continues to blur between Real Life and Cyber Life.

Definitely interesting to see how this turns out.
Reply

Posted: Aug 11th 2007 9:03PM Neebs said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I, for one, could care less about Second Life.
Reply

Posted: Aug 11th 2007 10:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That is to say, you couldn't care less about Second Life.
Reply

Posted: Aug 11th 2007 11:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Grammer FTW!
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2007 12:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Kelsey Grammer, perhaps?
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2007 12:43AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's not grammatically incorrect. It's a common phrase, as wrong as it sounds.
http://dictionary.reference.com/help/faq/language/g09.html
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2007 12:56AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can always care less. It's a nonsense phrase that means you still hold whatever you're talking about in some esteem. The better thing to say is "I, for one, like Second Life." That's more concise.

Of course it's not grammatically incorrect. It's a perfectly cromulent sentence.

If you meant that you couldn't care less about Second Life, I'm with you.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2007 11:38AM jcmschwa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i feel like joystiq commenters have gotten more intelligent since the upgrade to the new layout...anyone see that trend as well or is this just a rare occurrence right here?
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2007 2:46PM Neebs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Or perhaps they've not gotten smarter, just more easy to distinguish by avatars? E.g., I'm clearly the guy with the Is It A Spider Avatar, whereas many others I recognize have variations of Mario.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2007 3:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wasn't the argument about the phrase 'Could(n't) care less...' on Joystiq not too long ago.

Whatever, I agree with Jouten though, the line between Reality and Cybereality is constantly becoming more and more blurred, and this is just one more step up the ladder.
Reply

Posted: Aug 11th 2007 9:49PM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
People should stop playing Second Life and instead play 4th Life. With the power of the 4th Dimension!
Reply

Posted: Aug 11th 2007 10:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Because when i want to have sex, I think Second Life.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2007 5:04AM SSUK said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Sadly, some people do...
Reply

Posted: Aug 11th 2007 10:33PM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hmm... Interesting.

On one hand, I think, "lol Second Life."

On the other hand, they do have a point, since the users, not Linden Labs, own the content they create, I guess.

Plus, I hate smartassed brats. Go for it, Alderman!
Reply

Posted: Aug 11th 2007 10:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The only real reason I could see for having virtual sex would be if you and your mate were not together for some reason. Say one was in the army and the other was at home, with this program and an erotic phone call it could get interesting.

All in all I don't see this program being nearly as lame as those sex games on the PC where there's no one playing with you. At least with this you have another person at the other end to interact with. Either way I have no interest in such things as I prefer the real thing.
Reply

Posted: Aug 11th 2007 10:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
And you call yourself a gamer? For shame
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2007 2:42AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Second Life has voice chat now, apparently.
Reply

Posted: Aug 11th 2007 10:58PM Mabui said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
.. Second life is just ripe with strange news.
Reply

Posted: Aug 11th 2007 11:11PM Aperture said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i really dont care about second life, but i hope that guy hangs!
Reply

Posted: Aug 11th 2007 11:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
First I want to say man I wish I had photoshop those avatars you people do are really cool.

Second,something like this happened to the PSP homebrew community once.Someguy stole a program of some other dude develop and he was taking credit for it and selling it in the web(Ebay),the other guy was all "WTF?",I think he sue him as well but I dont know what happened mostly because I didn't care.

Seriously I dont know how can anyone sue over the right of an unlicensed(Well I dont know if it is licensed which would be weird) program or mod.

Third,The internet is for porn but this is ridiculous.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2007 12:36AM Catprog said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The things is you own the copyright for anything that you create in second life.
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2007 1:20AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Even the commercialization rights?
Reply

Posted: Aug 12th 2007 1:49AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Then you probably lack imagination. There's a LOT of things which is for all intents and purposes impossible to perform IRL. (see also: furry fandom)

But for that case, I frankly would suggest text-based programs. There's only so much you can do in a imaged environment due to inadequate precision of controls.
Reply

Posted: Aug 13th 2007 12:01PM illiteratePoet said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
People who use the acronym "IRL" casually make me chuckle inside.
Reply

Posted: Aug 13th 2007 10:17AM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bow chika...

...Bow wow
Reply

Posted: Sep 20th 2007 11:05AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow - what are the statistical odds of finding an entire gaming forum where not one of it's members has .. "taken matters into their own hands" while viewing a bit of inspiration... especially since it's a behavior you even find in lower primates, much less the first neolithic man who went off to the bushes clutching his little carving of the Venus of Willendorf, to "umm... worship the goddess"...

Never tried virtual sex in SL, mainly because I'm happily ensconced with a first life partner, but I imagine it would be more satisfying than hiding in the bathroom with the faucet running while ogling the Victoria's Secret catalogue, because at the other end of those pixels in front of you is another living breathing person as happy to be there as you are.

It's a disconnect a lot of people, both in and out of SL, have - that just because it uses game mechanics, that it's a game. SL is a communication system. As valid as your phone, or email, or IM's. It's a way for one individual to impart information to one or more others. Sure, where there's a communication system, some folks are going to use it for sex - "See cave painting Og make? It HOT!". However, plenty of others use SL for all manner of other purposes.

Dunno bout you, but I got pretty tired of game theory whose main accomplishment is for you to "kill" x number of pixels to gain x number of points and advance to bigger tools to kill the same pixels in drag.

Personally, I much prefer setting my own goals, my own milestones creating something that not just any user can accomplish just by being there.

If you can write off the validity of virtual experience then why are you expecting anyone to take you seriously here in a forum, in the form of words rendered by pixels, transmitted over phonelines... written words that are by their nature, one of the first forms of virtual communication?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW