| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (32)

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 2:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Click here to see EA's Wikipedia shenanigans backfire on them:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Arts#Editing_of_Wikipedia

pwned.
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 2:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
nice job ea
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 2:24PM kmeisthax said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
There's an editor policy in the Wikipedia: namespace that states that people/corps should not edit their own articles. Bannable offense much?
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 2:49PM Neebs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yep. It's called Vanity.
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 2:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
HAHA! F*cking idiots!
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 2:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
No wonder the article claimed that EA was an innovative, revolutionary company that thrives on competition!
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 2:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
also on apparently the same topic, turns out the FBI and CIA were also changing a lot of articles.
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 2:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I wonder why?, Lol.

Hey what is that Pizza van doing outside my house?
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2007 12:28AM DonaldMick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's stuck in line behind the Flowers By Irene party van.
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2007 11:56PM Niasyn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dave's not here man..
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 2:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why they tried to erase Trip Hawkins anyway?

You can’t blame a company for trying to improve their image even when they are doing it WRONG!! , this is kind of paranoid I mean really when anyone has said "I'm not buying Medal of honor airborne because the EA Spouse controversy”, I have heard “I'm not buying Madden 07 because Ea releases a Madden game every nine months or so and they take out the madden servers of the oldest versions forcing you to buy a new Madden game”.



Reply

Posted: Aug 20th 2007 3:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can absolutely blame a company when their preferred method of trying to improve their image includes replacing facts with spin. And if people refrain from buying their games because they do not want to support a company that engages in these practices, more power to them.
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 3:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If they were really interested in "accuracy", they wouldn't purge Trip Hawkins from the corproate record.

What an idiot response. Anyone with half a clue sees right through that.
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 3:13PM iwantmymtv said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
BOYCOTT EA. Greedy jerk bastards!!
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 3:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This whole "scandal" is being blown a bit out of proportion. The only thing the Wikipedia Tracker proves is that an EA owned IP address made edits, albeit sweeping ones, to the Wikipedia page. This isn't evidence of a major EA conspiracy, it could just be one or more overzealous employees.

Of course I'll jump right on the bash EA bandwagon if someone uncovers the "Erase Trip Hawkins" memo or something.
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 3:17PM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
This EA rep admits to the editings made by an/some EA employee(s). And the reason was to "ensure accuracy," when it did only the opposite, to make EA look better.

So, something tells me it wasn't just one overzealous employee.
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 3:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fair enough, but the rep doesn't state that the deletion of Trip Hawkins or the deletion of EA Spouse data was the work of this "accuracy rep." I know a few people that routinely monitor the content of wikipedia pages for their companies, schools, or favorite teams. There's no way to know that EA was actively revising history as a corporate policy.

It just seems so stupid to me, and such a waste of company time. When you consider how big EA's PR marchine is, it seems like trying to change Wikipedia would be a futile effort with no return on the time invested.
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 5:03PM JoshMilewski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The spokesperson acknowledged what happened and stated outright the company made the edits.

As for me, I just have another reason to never buy anything that has to do with EA (my policy's been going strong since early 2002!)
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 3:13PM Dale P said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Why don't these companies ever realise that when you are caught red-handed, lying makes you look worse and not better?
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 4:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ask RockStar if they learned that lesson...
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 3:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
teehee. Silly EA, Wikis are for nerds!
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 3:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The EA asshattery continues uninterrupted.
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 3:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
EA = Phail
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 4:20PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Such is the double-edged sword of Wikipedia's freedom

Fortunately, the righteous outnumber the asshats, at least where Wikipedia is concerned
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 4:37PM AoE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lol, good thing you qualified that Mr Khan... this is the internet after all ;)
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 4:39PM PoisonedAl said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Thank you EA. I needed another reason to dislike you.
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 7:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You really needed another reason?
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2007 4:30PM PoisonedAl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, but they are nice to have around. They are a bugger to dust tho.
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 5:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
From the EA Wiki page:
"Electronic Arts announced it would not support the Sega Dreamcast unless it sold 1 million units. When this happened within a record 90 days, EA went back on their word and declined to support the Dreamcast in favour of Sony's PlayStation 2."

Some things can never be forgiven. Rot in hell EA.
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2007 6:35PM AoE said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I always thought the Dreamcast being free of EA games was actually a great service on their part... it kept the number of crap games released on the DC amazingly low vs any other console.
Reply

Posted: Aug 19th 2007 12:01AM HollowYoshi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ AoE

...sad, but true.
Reply

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 1:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Historical accuracy is entirely inconvenient, let me just fix that.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW