| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (115)

Posted: Aug 19th 2007 10:58AM blindlama said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I live in Norway, so it might not be that comparable, our faulty consoles get sent to Germany. But it only took 8 days or so for me when my console started freezing all the time in GoW..
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2007 9:14PM ForTheHuynh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I can buy a 99%, but I can't buy a 100%."

Well, looks like you're getting Bioshock. That's fine by all of us here. More copies for us then.

Posted: Aug 19th 2007 1:31AM Slaziman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Kickass avatar!
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2007 10:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Let me make a declaration: Scores given by review companies are often arbitrary to a point, and the specific numbers don't matter. It's like Whose Line is it Anyway. Everything's made up, and the points don't matter. Video game review scores only serve as a litmus test for how enjoyable the game may be. No more, and probably a bit less. Because of that, it does not matter if games get a 10/10 scores because review scores don't matter.

Can we agree on that?

Posted: Aug 18th 2007 10:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
97?,94? Ha! I knew it the game is crap(Sarcasm, I know is unneeded but my comments tend to be misinterpreted.)

Really WTF with Ign 97?, please IGN gave Guitar hero 2 a 9.5 and prey a 9 and you gave Bioshock a 9.7 what suddenly IGN isn’t impressed? ,Bullsh*t.

If Bioshock gets a 10 from Gamespot it officially becomes this Gen Ocarina of Time.

Posted: Aug 18th 2007 10:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
ugh, don't compare it to a zelda game, they suck
Reply

Posted: Aug 19th 2007 12:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why?, zelda games are cool and with Oot I mean a Instant classic loved by everyone including the press.
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2007 11:26PM sand0789 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Laughing Target,

You say a review score is nothing like a school score because school scores are purely objective. You get 9 questions out of 10 and that is a 90%.

This is true for a multiple choice test. Especially in college, you are often being graded on an entire paper or essay type questions. The grader doc points for objective things like grammar or false information. But when it comes to grading criteria like overall understanding, flow, structure, overall quality, etc. the grader will make subjective criticisms.

I had a teacher in college that had never given a 100% score for a paper in his entire career. I had many that gave you 100% if you had perfect grammer. And yes, I intentionally mispelled that last word.

10/10 for Jake's post for having perfect grammar.

Posted: Aug 18th 2007 11:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Does three hearts mean, "the perfect comment"?

Posted: Aug 19th 2007 12:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The 3 hearts are reserved for the shortest and smartest responses.
Reply

Posted: Aug 19th 2007 3:55AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Heh. Red-ringed yesterday. No joke. I cry in the dark.

Posted: Aug 19th 2007 12:17PM ReclaimerCube said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually here is a better review

http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/bioshock

have fun joystiq

Posted: Aug 20th 2007 8:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Honestly, if this game is getting 100/100, it had better be the greatest game I have every played - to date, anyway.

Also, for those who are not good with numbers, 100/100 is a "perfect" score. You can't get any higher. That means it's the best, and nothing can beat it. That would imply perfection.

Posted: Aug 20th 2007 12:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Game ratings are inflated, there are far fewer truly groundbreaking games than there used to be, and people are impressed by big numbers. I have not and probably will not play Bioshock, but given that Xbox 360 has been rife with FPSes, I'm willing to accept that the reviewers know what they're talking about.

Of course, I think 10/10 is too high, myself. A shortlist of perfect games for me: VF2 and NIGHTS on Saturn, Resident Evil on PSX, Resident Evil 4 on GameCube, SMB3 on NES, and Yoshi's Island and SF2 Turbo on SNES. Maybe Sonic 2 for Genesis, but that might be a stretch.

Posted: Aug 20th 2007 6:31PM kftgr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Folks contending that 10/10 should not be achieved, you're stubbornly putting your own personal slant on others' opinions. The numbers are just a guide and not meant to be taken as absolute.

Just go to the sites that have the ratings and READ at what their ratings scale means.

Know what? I'll do it for you.

Game Informer: 10 - Outstanding. A truly elite title that is nearly perfect in every way. This score is given out rarely and indicates a game that cannot be missed.

IGN:
10.0
Virtually flawless. No game is absolutely perfect, but 10s represent the pinnacle of gaming brilliance. It doesn't get any better than this. This is like winning the lottery on your birthday. It takes a rare and special game to earn a perfect 10 from IGN.

1UP:
We rate games on a scale of 1-10 with .5 increments. Anything we score in the 9-10 range is considered excellent...

Xbox World 360: couldn't find a score key.

From the looks of it, the reviewers' scales don't say that 10/10 is perfect. They already recognize that no game is perfect. So stop with the "No game should be 10/10" spiel.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW