BioShock widescreen issue causing complaints

by Justin McElroy on Aug 21st 2007 11:28AM

On this, a day that many of you have been looking forward to for so long, we hate to squelch any of your BioShock joy, but we figured that this was something you'd want to know about. Some fans on the game's forums have been upset by the way the game handles widescreen. Or rather, how it doesn't. Apparently, the widescreen image is generated by just lopping off the top and bottom of the fullscreen image. Typically, a widescreen image is created by giving the player a larger horizontal field of view. You can see the part of the screen that widescreen gamers are missing out on in the red boxes above in a picture we took on our home setup.

There was extra frustration from fans as Chris Kline, Lead Programmer on BioShock, had previously said in the forums, "You will see more in widescreen. We use a different projection matrix; there is no squashing or stretching of the image involved." A 2K staffer has said that they are looking into the issue and we hope to hear more soon.

[Thanks, Scott]

Source

Tags: 2kboston, 2kgames, bioshock, PC, widescreen, Xbox-360

Reader Comments (97)

I thought I noticed that the up/down on widescreen seemed weird. I just thought it was me. It doesn't turn this from a good game into a bad game, it's just kinda sad that developers would overlook something like this.

Exactly. Bioshock is still a fantastic game (Why, oh why must I work tonight!), but this is a little disappointing, especially when you look at Mr. Kline's comments.

I'll still enjoy it, but hopefully a patch will be on XBL soon.

Hey, maybe it's not such a bad thing that my 360 bricked the other day. By the time I get it back (October) there might even be a patch for this. Here's hoping for some good to come out of this, as Bioshock was my most anticipated game and I can't play it for a month!

@Bak8807
What the hell. Seriously. Where do these ridiculous comments come from and what do they have to do with BioShock, widescreen or anything else?

I wish we could vote to sort comments into a "fanboy" section at the bottom of the page so that anyone who wants to read that crap can do so.

Now all we need is some retard to say "Too bad PS3 only has the 'no screen' option, harhar" and we can have the perfect fanboy pair.

Did somebody say eye patch?

This is a bloody mess and someone should clean it up with their blood. OK realistically they should fix this up right away since their targets are likely to have widescreen to enjoy this game.

I wonder how much Sony pays guys like bak8807...

that's all.

I don't even notice it what with trying to stay alive against the big daddies and all.

**Patch out Next Week**

Certainly not a deal breaker but it would be nice to get a patch for true widescreen on the quick.

Please say its a settings error... Not that I won't play it and enjoy it as much... but its still dissapointing...

Perhaps "different" projection matrix really means "new" projection matrix, and they didn't iron out all the flaws in it

Either way, people are taking this too seriously, and its also probably something easily patched

Wow, and thats all they did, crop and stretch. Thats a shame too, he could of just said instead of making it widescreen we decided to go full and just stretch out wide to make it fit. Now what about on the computer side?

As I understand it this is both sides.

I noticed this happening with tv shows back when widescreen was just getting popular.
People just seemed to get fatter and loose the top of their heads.
That's mainly why I've always stuch with 4:3

You're partly right. It's not a squishing issue as in, its not a 4x3 image stretched to 16x9. It's a crop. And you stuck with 4x3? You're missing out my friend.

Yeah, i hated it when you walked into a TV shop, and then all the salemen are like 'widescreen is the best thing since sliced bread'. Then you look at all the tellies and there were some very fat Homers :P
Yeah cos im really going to pay $2000 for that haha

some 4:3 tvs offer 16:9 enhancement, ie letterboxing but a nice picture at least.

Is it just PC or is it 360 too?

Here it is - the flaw that's going to stop me from playing this game. Cancel the pre-order!

Pffft. No.

Ah, as someone who still plays on a good old SDTV, this won't matter at all to me. Still, it is odd if they did the widescreen simply by cutting the top and bottom out.

I'm on a SDTV 16:9 TV, and this effects everyone, HDTV and SDTV. 4:3 is nice, especially on smaller screens... But Widescreen and big TV... It just feels right.

This means absolutely nothing in a game where you're looking all around constantly for fear of being jumped by a Splicer!

I knew there was something odd in the demo...
Oh well...4 hours 8 minutes until Steam unlocks!

I've got other games to play and this bugs the hell out of me, so I won't contribute to their "opening weekend" sales numbers tonight. Still, I'm sure I'll buy it eventually... I just hope they release a patch before that happens. If not I'll have to configure the 360 and TV to display a 4:3 image so I can see the entire scene.

It does silly that the Bioshock developers chose to crop on the platform that is leading the way for HD wide screen gaming.

Well, *technically* it's not stretched, just cropped. Also I don't see what the deal with widescreen is for anything other than films.

Then you obviously haven't experianced widescreen gaming. I got a 32" Widescreen SDTV yesterday for my 360 (got a new HD TV in the main room) and I'm already loving playing Halo 2, Dead Rising and Gears of War on widescreen... Other games I haven't yet had time to play on yet, but just these examples alone justify why widescreen gaming is the future, you can see more of the picture, which for shooter games like BioShock will help aid you, you can see those annoying enemies who hide around corners, you don't have to turn your view so much just to see what's around you. This cropped crap they're flowing into BioShock does nothing but hinder you, I agree... I hope they impliment proper 16:9 support but it wont hold off my purchase this friday.

Yea... I mean... who would want more video information on screen?

what I meant was, what is the point of widescreen, instead of say, tallscreen? or juse wider and taller screen, so you can see more in EVERY direction??

The real reason why widescreen is more appealing is that it's more natural. Your personal field of vision is effectively in widescreen, caused by your two eyes being horizontal. A "tallscreen" would only be appropriate if our eyes were matched vertically on our heads.
And also from a gameplay standpoint, seeing the left and right is more important than the top and bottom, because you don't really need to see the rest of the sky or the ground to know that it's there, but that enemy hiding just on the left edge of your peripheral vision, that you probably want to see.

Dunno if these pics were taken from same screen or no but if you use the background objects (crates, bench, hose) as a reference point, the player in the top pic appears to be closer to the background objects than player in bottom pic. These shots weren't taken from exactly the same position so naturally the players' points of view will appear to be cut off. Haven't noticed any problems with my display.

The top pic isn't actually any closer. That's what the problem is...everything in the top pic is stretched, because all that's being done when you switch to wide-screen is they're cropping the top and bottom, and stretching it to fit the screen...so it looks like the top pic is closer, but really everything is just bigger...

know what I'm saying?

to me it looks like the exact same TV, they just changed the settings from wide to full screen

It doesn't look like the screenshots were taken from the same position - the widescreen photo shows more on the ground to the right, but not on the left. If you take a step back, then the widescreen would look to have the wider field of view. Unless you can assert that the screenshots were taken from the exact same coordinates, which those two are not, then you can't tell how the field of views compare.

Personally, I think the widescreen view looks fine. It has a nice close-up view that feels realistic to me..

It seems like this is more a matter of somantics and really doesn't affect game play, nor the enjoyment of said game at all. Who cares if they cropped it a bit?

Yes, I know they said they wouldn't. It's not like it's the first fib a developer has told before.

Meh. This game still looks awesome.

MEH! Nothing can deter me or my rock-hard manhood from acquiring this game.

Is it the same problem when the screen itself is a widescreen? Cuz i haven't noticed anything. Never once did i wonder what was wrong with the screen while playing.

I didn't notice any problems either. I wonder if this is just for certain TVs or something...

Bah, not a problem,my PC monitor is 4:3, i have a VGA cable, its all good.

I noticed this too when I played the PC demo, but not the 360 demo. In the scene when you pick up the first plasmid on the PC demo I couldn't see most of the Little Sister's face, while on the 360 I could see it.

If it's actually on both versions then it seems like it might even be worse on the PC.

-Jeff
http://alinktothefuture.com

Cripes, its a FPS, LOOK UP if you can't see the top of the thing on the wall!!!

Well, this isn't a deal breaker for me by any means, but everybody in here saying that this isn't a big deal is crazy. If this were a PS3 game, it would be ripped to shreds for something like this. I'm still picking up my copy today and can't wait to play it, but it just won't be the same now that I know about this. Sure, I probably would have never even noticed, but it'll be at the back of my mind now that this has come out. This is going to be an awesome game, but it's sad that something like this will tarnish its image.

Anyone who doesn't think this is a problem is kidding themselves. This is not the way to go about making games and I don't want to have change the settings on my xbox just so Bioshock looks correct on my $1,500 television. What's even more insane is all the 100/100 reviews this game got without anyone checking the 4:3 vs 16:9 aspect ratios.

Shotty work all around.

ShoDDy spelling, too. You f*ktard.

Ha ha ha!! That's a plus for you Heckbender!

are you fucking kidding me? seriously. you see what you see. if you want to see more back up or look up. you guys kill me.

I know right?

Is it THAT serious?

This game is probably gonna be the best game of the year...regardless of this widescreen "drama".

Yeah, we're all simply crazy for wanting proper widescreen support. It's madness.

The image is NOT stretch, so everyone saying "I knew something was weird" are wrong. You would not have ever noticed anything unless you played both ways 16:9 and 4:3. The gaming experience will be fine. 2K knew what they were doing.

What Antwan said. If you're playing in widescreen, you'll approach an object and stop before it gets too close. It's not like people will typically switch between widescreen and normal viewpoints, and suddenly get disoriented because they can't see everything on screen now.

The only way you could technically see more in widescreen is if the angle of view changed (think fisheye lens at the extreme), but that's a totally different issue than aspect ratio.

I'm not saying that there isn't an issue, because I don't have the game yet to check for myself. But if those two images are what this story is based on, then I call shennanigans.

The player in the top picture is clearly closer to the subject matter than in the lower picture. It's not that it just looks that way because the wall is "stretched". It looks wider because he's closer. You can tell by looking at objects at the edges of the image.

The coil of rope: In the top image, the coil is much larger than in the lower one. And not just wider, as stretching would imply. It's also taller, which is indicative of a closer position.

Bits of Debris to the right: In the bottom image there are a few pieces of debris on the floor at the extreme right that are not visible in the top image. Again, this seems to me that it is because the player is further forward.

Again, I'm not saying there isn't an issue. Especially since 2K is supposedly looking into it. But I'd have to see something more conclusive than these two images before I'd even begin to worry about it.

| 1 | 2 | Most Recent | Next 50 Comments

Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Breaking News

The most popular posts
in the last 7 days

Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments

BioShock widescreen issue causing complaints

Reader Comments (97)

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:35AM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:41AM StrikeMan said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 1:31PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 2:55PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 3:43PM hvnlysoldr said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 4:37PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 9:24PM severian00 said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:36AM BrucieB said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:36AM Shagittarius said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:36AM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 6:27PM Mr Khan said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:38AM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:42AM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:40AM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:44AM watership said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 5:40PM NoNaMo said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:16PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:44AM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:44AM kenjimeadu said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:49AM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:57AM SSUK said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:50AM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:52AM Neebs said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:54AM Chappy said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:56AM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:20PM SSUK said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 1:00PM JeffM said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 2:21PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 3:48PM HoopyHobo said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 11:57AM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:00PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:08PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:00PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:00PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:06PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:07PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 22nd 2007 9:14AM baby sea tuna said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:08PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:09PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:10PM fuzzbee said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:17PM Professor Chaos said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:24PM clogger said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 1:37PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 2:41PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:31PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:40PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 1:17PM Vidikron said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:33PM (Unverified) said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:40PM madmaxmedia said

Posted: Aug 21st 2007 12:48PM (Unverified) said

Info

Description

MSRP

Release Date

Genre

Developer

Publisher

Rating

Breaking News

Double Fine Kickstarter passes $1 million in under 24 hours, breaking yet another record

Featured Stories

Ghost Recon: Future Soldier brings information warfare to the front

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

The most popular postsin the last 7 days

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW

The most popular posts
in the last 7 days