| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (42)

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 3:52PM Verno5x said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It's about damn time that someone stood up to these groups.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 3:52PM Shagittarius said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
This just in Manhunt 2 is now a gay dating simulator.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 5:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
And it would go right back to an AO rating. God bless America.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 3:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"It is a parent's rightful place to make choices for their own children. The ESRB and console manufacturers provide families with the tools and information to help them do so."

Damn straight.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 3:56PM Lamppost said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey Joystiq, where's McCauley on this??????
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 4:05PM Shagittarius said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I hate to add fuel to the fire but what happened to the ESRB rating on the back of Metroid Prime 3?

It lists:

Animated Blood
Sang en animation
Violence


Now even if its saying animated blood in french or something why the hell would the ESRB allow something like this go into the ESRB warning label. Parents will question what this is, its very confusing. Not a good move during this time of game examination.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 4:27PM SSUK said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Heaven forbid that a NA game, which is compatable with Canadaian game consoles have FRENCH on them to help Nintendo just have one production line for ALL of NA instead of different ones for French and English language.
And heaven forbid that people look at the ESRB rating and use that thing which sits in your skull, which some of us use now and then, to descipher that "Sang en animation" ISN'T English and thus, shouldn't concern them.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 5:21PM vidguy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Did you miss the rest of the box, which also contains French? I think people are smart enough to see that it's a multilingual box and therefore has a multilingual rating.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 5:44PM Shagittarius said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
So you don't think people who can't understand the ratings now are going to understand them when they are partially written in french? I think this is just the kind of thing the ESRB doesn't need to prove they are effective at doing their job.

But whatever you guys.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 8:15PM D3m0sthenes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I noticed that also!

Get your French off my English, Nintendo!

I agree if they want to put it on there, put it seperate, not with the English.

Thanks,
Pheonix Wright
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 4:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That was a major burn.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 4:36PM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well all else is failing at the moment.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 4:23PM SSUK said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"It is a parent's rightful place to make choices for their own children. The ESRB and console manufacturers provide families with the tools and information to help them do so."

... "If you still ignore them and blame us afterwards, there is no hope for you and we're very disapointed you've already had children."
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 4:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm impressed. Although I am saddened that the game had to be altered in the first place (not the ESRB's fault, but Wal-Marts and other major vendors), I am happy that they have the gumption to stand up to these neo-conservative, evangelical christian groups that want to censor all mediums, restricting artistic expression and drowning the creative human spirit. Props.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 4:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Sadly, R* "changing" the game had nothing to do with Wal*Mart/Target/BB/CC/et al. It had everything to do with Nintendo and Sony. Don't forget, they will not grant liscences to games that are rated AO. Period.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 5:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, except that the poeple pioneering the censorship of everything (tipper gore with the music, lieberman and Hillary with the games) are mostly democrats you tool
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 5:30PM Crono141 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Its got absolutely nothing to do with neo-cons and christians and everything to do with the government butting in where it doesn't belong. "Nanny State" is what Hilary Clinton wants (It Takes a Village, anyone?)

Leave politics out of it, both parties are equally to blame.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 7:21PM SpartacusMagnus said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"Neo-conservative evangelical Christians"? Where did you pull that from? I was not aware evangelical Christians had much to do with national censorship, let alone that WalMart, ESRB, Sony and Nintendo were part of such a clandestine religious extremist group.

While we're at it, let's blame evangelical Christian's stance on the biblical book of Genesis for the decline in math and science scores across America!

But seriously, just because it is politically incorrect to blame any religion besides Christianity for any of man's problems doesn't make it any less ignorant to do so.
Reply

Posted: Aug 29th 2007 5:24PM mastjaso said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Sparticus

Actually you could blame evangelical christians for a lower knowledge of science in your schools since they force teachers to teach creationism ( or intelligent design or whatever) in class rooms instead of stuff that's founded on hard facts (science).

However I see your general point.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 4:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Wow, that statement was an elegant and classy way to say "F*ck you".

Go ESRB!!
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 4:54PM mrmobius said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The ESRB just released a statement that needs to be quoted and used for many years to come because, lets admit it, it is the parents fault if an under age kid gets a game rated M and then starts to act up so much that said parent then goes to the media and complains about violent games sending little Timmy to hell.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 5:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
wow for once, gotta so, GJ ESRB, kthxbai senators!

Also I would like to add, yes PARENTS are responsible, they got a warning. If you, as a parent, buy a game called "Manhunt 2" rated M, for a 8 year old, you fail at life.

This was like one time in a comic store I heard some dad complaining that his kid bought $500 worth of pokemon cards. Hey dipshit, YOU PAID FOR THOSE CARDS. Unless your kid has the best lemonade stand in the country, in which case, he can buy whatever he damn well wants!
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 5:20PM Cartman86 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Re-rating is not uncommon. This makes no sense. People edit their films till they get a lower rating every day. I'm sure games do it too. Its just since Manhunt 2 has been so talked about for being banned these people who don't know about re-ratings are up in arms.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 5:24PM vidguy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
FANTASTIC statement by the ESRB. I just wish we could find out exactly WHAT was taken out to get the M rating.

Funny that these politicians have problems with a cut-and-rerated video game yet NC17 movies cut and rated down to R or R down to PG13 doesn't bother anybody. It wasn't too long ago when a shot of blood or a single curse word would get you an R rating. Now I've heard all but the F-bomb on TV! That's doing more to degrade our society than a single video game ever could (especially a sequel to a mediocre game).
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 5:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I still can't fathom why Rockstar bothered to make a second Manhunt, what with all of the negative attention they've received, and the microscope they're under. The first must have made a decent profit.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 5:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But they're using American letters!
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 5:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ssuk and vidguy

Is someone working on this reply thing?
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 7:08PM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just make sure it says "replying to __" above your comment. It doesn't always work the first time you click Reply.

Nice avatar by the way.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 7:01PM DaveO123 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Has anyone mentioned how stupid it is that the age limit for M rated games is 17 and the age limit for AO games is 18? I distinctly remember once I turned 18 I was ready to look at boobs in a responsible manner, whereas when I looked at boobs at 17 I would have seizures and swallow my tounge.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 7:14PM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There's a big difference in the ratings. M rated games aren't RESTRICTED to 17 and over, at least not in the midwest USA, and the rating exists as a suggestion. No one under 18 can buy AO. It's like how most stores and theaters are still slack on restricting under 18 from going into an R rated movie, but no one who wants to keep his/her job would let a minor into a porn film.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 5:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
On the one hand, the ESRB has just dished out a verbal reprimand to politicians and "for-the-children" organisations. On the other, they introduced what I like to call the number confusion. Basically, they threw a percentage into their comment. Normally I wouldn't mind, but let's not forget that politicians also use (fake) percentages too.

But all in all, I think this fiasco should be over quickly as long as Yee and the CCFC stop their idiotic demands.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 7:10PM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I know what you mean. The response to those stats? 11% of parents aren't involved in the purchase or rental of video games and 15% don't restrict their play. Think of that 10-15% of the children!
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 6:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The problem is, the politicians have to have some sort of scandal to hold on to so they can project the "protecting you and your children" image to voters too stupid to do research into real issues. It's the same philosophy that perpetuates the teaser for the evening news: "ARE YOUR CHILDREN IN DANGER FROM ? FIND OUT AT 11, then you turn it on to find a story about something that affects .000001% of the people living 5 towns away, 25 years ago, that MIGHT hit your family the same day monkees fly out of your ass.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 6:13PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Politicians wouldn't give a bad of rat pellets for us. Democrats aren't any more the defenders of the people than the Republicans are. They'll both piss all over you just to benefit their campaigns. This includes trying to attack video games. They're still somewhat an alien concept to many consumers, but thankfully for the Wii breaking into new markets, that viewpoint should begin to dissipate.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 6:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
is any one else sick of this shit? every anti games group and their grandmas are bitching about this game (before its even playable) and the only thing their doing is driving up sales. youd think they'd just let it go. Of course, its all because rockstar is doing it. any other developer and it'd be just another game being rerated. (case in point, in 2005 the punisher got rerated from ao to m and i didnt hear one peep from any watchdog group)
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 6:14PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As i said before, the ESRB was "strong" to stick to a rating that effectively banned the title, and having the game altered based on their strength will only give them more credibility in the eyes of concerned parents and others

A strong ESRB will prevent government interference
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 6:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The designers over did the content, making it far worse then they knew would pass for an "M" rating, just so they could dull it down only enough to keep what they originally wanted in the first place and still get that "M" rating. ESRB took the bait, hook, line and sinker, and we get our gore-rious untainted Manhunt 2 goodness just the way it was meant to be.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 6:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait, you mean to tell me monkeys might fly out of my ass, AND my children are in danger? i'm scared, where oh where is my local friendly politician in shining armor to protect my sacred and beautiful way of life?

I'd say it's time for another American revolution, but we're all too glued to American Idol to care. Enjoy your family friendly shows while your smoldering cities crumble and fall to the ashes losers.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 7:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
With so many non-gamers taken offence to the violence in video games, maybe we should stop blaming the non-gamers and take a look at the games. Could it be that they are concerned about violence because games have gotten more and more violent each year? Could it be that video games are rated differently from film because games don't treat the violence in a mature way?
Reply

Posted: Aug 29th 2007 1:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why should we look at the games? If it is the non gamers that have the issue as you say, then they are already voting with their wallets by not buying these games. Why should I care if there is violence in foreign films for instance, if I don't watch those movies anyway? Why should I have a say on what you find entertaining? If you aren't a consumer of a product, then you should have no say on the development of features of said product.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 7:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The simple answer is: Nintendo knows sonny boy flies the coop at 17-18, gets $100,000 yr job in the oil patch right outa school,is an ardent gamer,s-o-o-o...they introduce ballsy M rated games for the Wii to keep him outta the Sony and M$ camp and presto!-another N loyal recruit! Simple really cus all that political correctness jive he was fed [before the big $$] ends up as-yes-monkeys flying out of the ass! lol
Reply

Posted: Aug 29th 2007 2:02AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sounds like re-hashed responses to me...as if the ESRB is repeating themselfs...

then again Politians can't get it through their thick heads.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW