| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (80)

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 11:24AM FrankTheCrank said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not a dig, but people actually have more than one PS3?

I'll pick up the retail version with free bluetooth headset.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 11:26AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seems more like even on a single PS3, only the person who actually bought it can use their PSN account to play online. Maybe I read it wrong.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 11:37AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Isn't the retail version $60? I don't think that headset is exactly "free".
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 12:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The real issue here is that on a single PS3, only the account that was used to buy and download Warhawk will be able to play it. So if you share that PS3 with other family members, they will be unable to play Warhawk unless they use your account. In my opinion, this really sucks for an online multiplayer game. People want to play online with THEIR account, not their parent's or sibling's. And to tell people they need to buy a separate copy for each person who shares that PS3 is just insanity.

So if you want Warhawk and share your PS3 with others, then you should probably get the retail version. Or better yet, don't buy it so that Sony rethinks this idiotic policy.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 1:55PM FrankTheCrank said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Boo...you are correct sir. My apologies.

If your lucky enough to live in the land up north(Canada), Best Buy has Warhawk for $39.99 with headset.

Hopefully BB will follow in the US.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 4:04PM bm111 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"And to tell people they need to buy a separate copy for each person who shares that PS3 is just insanity."


To most corporate pricks, that's not insanity, it's genius!
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 11:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, I'm not terribly disappointed. Though my roommate might be a bit annoyed. The way it sounds, we can only play on my PSN account. Seems like I may have been better off with the disk based version. Meh, I get to play on my PSN account. So, whatever. He'll have to deal or pay $40.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 11:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
at least you got to play it already.

im still calling around trying to find a place that has it stocked. i don't feel like waiting till wednesday--and target straight up lied and said it was coming in friday. hopefully the sony style store around here will have it by the time i leave work today.

if anyone's picked up the retail version, where'd you get it? and more importantly, why aren't you playing it?
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 11:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Nope, haven't played it yet. Download didn't finish until 2AM and I have to work all day. Won't be playing until tonight.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 11:45AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You could play split screen with him.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 12:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Matt B: I know, we just can't have separate stats.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 11:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Eh, no real big deal. Just means everyone will have to pay more money to Sony. What's wrong with that?
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 11:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
kinda sound like anything else you buy...

you buy a disc, only one person can use it at a time.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 11:44AM SSUK said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Uh... Not quite what they mean. The licence is restricting just ONE account to use it... Ever. Not just while one person's using the game anther user cannot play it. You cannot just decide "Oh, I want a go", change profile and have it working, like a physical game disc would do.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 11:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Isnt that like Valve and HL2?
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 11:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This doesnt seem like that big of a deal. Ill be going with the BR disc version to get the BT headset.
Does anyone know if the BR disc version could be copied to the HDD?
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 12:02PM mrlogical said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The BR version will install the full 798 MB to your HD to play, but you'll still need the disc in to run it.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 12:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
thanks for the reply. I understand why you still need the disc in the play it, I just dont like it.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 11:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
well the 360 does lock content to the console it is downloaded to often times; premium content, that is. So if I buy an episode of South Park and bring my hardrive to a friends house so we can watch or play stuff there, I can't actually watch that episode unless I upload my gamertag to his system (about a 5 minute process. you just need your email address and password you created your account with)its free obviously. but yah, if that friend doesnt have an internet connection, preventing me from signing into Live, then we're shit outta luck.

Does stuff like this suck? yah, but Microsoft and Sony are just trying to protect themselves and the developers of downloadable content.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 11:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I love how a completely reasonable business practice is going to get turned into a huge piece of negative spin. We've been lucky that Sony has been so good with it's DRM so far, now that they're not letting people share a full-fledged game, they're bad people?

Correct me if I'm wrong (maybe I am), but last time I checked, you can't share ANY paid-for DLC from Live with other users.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 11:43AM SSUK said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If this was a retail game, pressed to disc ($40 is a bit less than a usual game price, but it's 3/4 of it... What makes this so much more different than the licence you get when you buy a PHYSICAL DISC?). You could take it anywhere, use on any machine, use on any profile for ONE purchase of the game. Here, they're making you pay for the game, then pay for it again to play it on another console or another profile on the same console. And that's terrible. Sure, it's a 'reasonable business practise' it gets them money, but that's just kicking the consumer in the balls and then laughing at them while they're down on the ground.

And you're right to a certain extent. However, Live content is restricted to premium video content. For Live Arcade games, you can play them across all your profiles on the same console.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 11:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"the game can be installed on up to five consoles using that account (and only that account for playing)"

You can play on another console with your account, just not with another account (on any console).

If your PS3 is shared by multiple people then you should consider the disc version. If you're the only one that uses your PS3 and like the convenience of not having to load a disc first (like me), then this shouldn't be a dealbreaker.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 12:51PM copa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Correct me if I'm wrong (maybe I am), but last time I checked, you can't share ANY paid-for DLC from Live with other users."

I'm happy to correct you. As ssuk noted, you can share with any number of users on the console you originally downloaded to.

More to the point, however, is that Live doesn't have this 24-hour restriction on online play for multiple consoles. I can play Bomberman Live online on my console. Then I can go over to my buddies house, download onto his console under my account, and play online. And then I can do the same thing at my brother's house. All in the same day.

I think that approach is much more reasonable than preventing me from playing at home because I'm worried I might want to play elsewhere in the next 24 hours.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 1:05PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I dont think it is reasonable at all that I can only use on account on my machine to play it. So if my GF wants to play it on her account we have to get another copy? If I want to play without using my normal name so I can be secret and not talk to folks - I need a new copy? If a guest comes over and I dont want them to use my account and make me look like a tard (if they are jerks or something) - then I need another copy.

That isn't reasonable to me at all. Thats a rip off. To me its taking policing a bit too far.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 1:21PM copa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
NATO_Duke, please don't aimlessly bitch if you have no idea what you are talking about.

For games like Bomberman that support multiple people playing online from the same console, you and your girlfriend can both log in and play. As long as one of you has the game licensed to your account, you can both play online at the same time.

So yes, it is very reasonable.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 1:46PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Copa - WTF are you talking about. I didn't log in and aimlessly bitch. More to the point, I wasn't talking about bomberman live you defensive prick.

Re-read the comment I left and look to what post it was responding to. It was about Warhawk, not bomberman. Who the hell cares about that game - besides, Live wasn't a topic of discussion - PSN was.

Once more, let me point out, your attack was pathetic and ill conceived. Good luck with the internet bully lifestyle.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 5:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Didn't you get the memo, Joystiq hates everyone/everything.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 11:58AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For the most part it seems fairly reasonable. Obviously it's no different from linking a Battlefield 2 key to an account or Valve games to one Steam account.

However this passage is particularly annoying, "a single Warhawk license cannot be used on more than one console within a single day."
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 12:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Erm... hello, ONLINE GAMES, havn't you played one before joystiq? You can never use a single account to play online with multiple copies of a game on different machines. How is this news? PS3 owners expected that if their friend downloaded this game that they could copy it and play it for free? Are you serious?
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 12:54PM copa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think PS3 owners expected that if they paid for the game and played it, then went to a buddies house and logged in exclusively on their account, they wouldn't have to sit around and wait for 24 hours before they could play online again.

That's how Steam and XBox Live work.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 3:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fair enough, the 24 hour thing is a little bit useless, but the main complaint seems to be that it is account-locked at all, which is actually common practice.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 12:25PM ajguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think it's silly that they limit you to one account, but you can play on 5 different PS3s. Who on Earth has five PS3s? So you mean to tell me that in a household with more than one gamer, and they plan on downloading the game, they each need to download a copy if they want to be able to play on their own accounts?

I guess you can compare this to PC games like BF2, but the more apt comparison would be to how the 360 handles downloadable games. Each game is tied to both that particular console and to your gamertag. That means that as long as you stay on the console you downloaded the game too, any profile on that machine can play it. But if you want to take it to a different console, only you can play it. That makes a lot more sense to me.

I just hope their upfront about this in the download page for the game. It makes a strong case for multi-gamer households to just get the Blu-ray.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 12:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Who cares? This game is a disappointment anyways. It is mediocre and most people are only "happy" with it (more like settling with it) because everything else for our PS3s arent that impressive either. Dont waste 60 bux buying this game. Hell dont download it either, unless you are really really bored and dont have a 360.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 12:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
were you in the beta at least?
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 12:35PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I doubt you've even played it. I was in the beta and the game is actually quite good.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 12:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
...Have you actually played it? Because you sound like a 360 troll. I personally don't care for this style of online game because I got bored of them in the days of Team Fortress Classic. However, I got into the beta and found the game to be EXTREMELY fun - and the beta had a LOT of issues. The retail version is probably stellar. It's a great game, and it's great that it can be had for such a good price.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 2:01PM FrankTheCrank said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fanboy!
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 12:29PM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Like this will prevent night vision enthusiasts.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 12:59PM DonaldMick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Like pirates with eye patches?
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 2:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Shut the fuck up with the Night Vision crap. Contribute something to the conversation or move on to the next post.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 2:41PM D3m0sthenes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Leave him alone you clown. He adds alot more than you do on this site.

So I suggest you go get yourself a big, tall, ice cold glass of SHUT YOUR MOUTH

On topic (hvnlysoldr's topic) I wonder if ninjas wear eye patches for night vision... or is it built in?!
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 3:22PM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The reason I posted before was to say this measure is to force as many people as possible to buy the game and prevent quasi legal mass sharing which Sony decries as leading to or is piracy.

@Raikage
Ninjas of course have night vision from before birth. It's dark and treacherous in a kunuichi's womb. A female ninja never gives up the goods and has to protect even that place. Plus it gives good training for ninjas to go through a gauntlet to birth and blocking the doctor's slap.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 5:45PM D3m0sthenes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I bet they chew themselves out of the womb or something. I bet the night vision helps in there... Kinda how Chuck Norris round-house kicked out of the womb, his own womb...
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 12:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
this means if you hav a sub accout that your sibling uses, like my bro. he cant play it. he can only play it on his name whic is bullsh*t. sony keeps screwing the pooch. i got to buy it again. well i feel ripped off
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 12:59PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It does seem overly restricted, but your brother could just play it on your account. I don't know why you would bother to buy it twice.
Reply

Posted: Aug 29th 2007 12:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Call Sony's customer support and let them know what you think: (800-345-SONY) http://www.us.playstation.com/Corporate/ContactUs
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 1:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report

"itdoes seem overly restricted, but your brother could just play it on your account. I don't know why you would bother to buy it twice"


im not. me and my bro want to keep our own stats. this wouldnt happen on xbox live, i'll tell you that. and when we play together. we would sure like to be on our accounts, he doesnt want to be TheGameM3(2), its stupid. i guess this is why you pay for xbox live, which i have never complained about.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 1:15PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, that's certainly a valid complaint about the stats.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 1:12PM ummhello said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
sooo, yeah, the licensing thing seems to be retarded. but what I'd REALLY like to see is a REVIEW? anyone play it yet? likes/dislikes? wouldn't mind buying a worthwhile game and a reason to dust off my PS3 aside from renting BD movies.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2007 1:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
if any body has contacted sony, post it, lets see what they are saying. i want a refund so i can get the bd disc, or at leat 20$ off the psn so i can dl on the sub account. makes sense, doesnt it? its not bad at all. 40$ may be a bit too much but its still fun to play.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW