UK has 1 million Wiis to play with

n64 was more powerful than ps1 and gamecube and xbox were both more powerful than ps2.

oh. "when they launched."

well, dreamcast was the most powerful when it launched, and 360 was the most powerful when it launched.

'more powerful' doesnt really mean anything to billy everyman.

MOAR POW3R!1

@mr nimblewick, i never said Wii is a fad. way to put words in my mouth.

@Jody, notice i used the word "mainly", not "100% because of this reason".

Curmeo is safe as long as he makes up his stupid fucking "exceptions." Whenever he is wrong about something, it's an exception to his INFALLIBLE logic.

I'm putting wii at 65-70 million worldwide. i dont think any console is ever going to surpass the ps2. unless there is a 'one console future'

if PS2 wasnt future proof, it would stick with CD-ROM, would have PS1-level graphics/performance, and wouldnt have an online service among other things.

"if PS2 wasnt future proof, it would stick with CD-ROM, would have PS1-level graphics/performance, and wouldnt have an online service among other things."

God, the stupidity of this statement just boggles my mind. So it has to have a new experimental storage format and graphics that ROXXORYOURSOXXOR to be "future proof".

You're drinking way to much Sony kool-aid. Let me give you a hint, PS3 isn't future-proof either. Actually, from the way sony keeps "Upgrading" it, it wasn't "present proof" either. It was obsolete 6 months after launch, because a newer, better PS3 just hit the market.

Future proof... I hope sony poisons that kool-aid soon, and rids of the Sony Fanboy stupidity.

I think whoever invented the word "future proof" needs to be slapped in the balls by a circus clown.

Smooth.

mudkips

Like silk

Purple Monkey Dishwasher.

Oh! Oh my...they're so...so...small...

sick burn

stiq burn

Your stick burns? My, that must be painful. Hurry to a doctor.

Dr. Mario?

...

Or Dr. Salvator?