It's rare that games do well once money is introduced as a reward. It's almost as if people have said something for centuries about business and pleasure and what a bad idea it is to mix them. Kwari is an FPS (and a company) looking to break that mold. You'll buy ammunition (they beat you to it Microsoft!) but you'll also pay a stake to enter a game. At that point, your health bar is your bankroll, and every shot that that hits you deducts money from your account and adds it to the shooter's. Imagine a game where every gun fires utility bills.
Sure, this all sounds like, well, a nightmare. But it's a nightmare that won't even get off the ground if the game isn't fun. Kwari puts our minds at ease though, saying the game was "developed using some of the most advanced technology available to ensure total financial infallibility fused with benchmark playability." Benchmark playability, people. What are you waiting for? Beta registration is up now!
Reader Comments (39)
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 9:40AM (Unverified) said
"Imagine a game where every gun fires utility bills."
That might have been the funniest thing I have read in weeks! Holy shit what an awful idea - unless you are really, really good at shooters. Then, well, fuck it - go take some kids' money!
Reply
That might have been the funniest thing I have read in weeks! Holy shit what an awful idea - unless you are really, really good at shooters. Then, well, fuck it - go take some kids' money!
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 10:06AM (Unverified) said
So I guess a aimbot could get you charged with larceny.
Reply
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 9:55AM (Unverified) said
It kind of sounds like they are following a system like moola.com (players fight over a pool of money smaller than what the developers bring in). Assuming that the entry fees aren't too much, they might actually pull this off.
~HotShotX
Reply
~HotShotX
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 9:58AM (Unverified) said
Isn't this essentially an equivalent to blood sports or at least gambling. I hope they have checked with their lawyers and the governments they plan on releasing this game to be safe. I've always wanted a game to play for money though... So once I have some extra cash to trow away I'm there.
Reply
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 10:20AM (Unverified) said
No they arn't actually shooting eachother but I just meant that in the aspect of say it being like a blood sport. Like in those movies where they have all the mercs go after eachother and the last surviver takes the prize.
Reply
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 12:00PM (Unverified) said
It would be fairly easy for this to be construed as gambling. A game where where an agreed upon monetary amount changes hands as the result of preset victory conditions, thats pretty much textbook gambling and will open this game up to a litany of problems both legally and socially. In the U.S. online poker is already in the middle of legislation seeking to ban it based on state and county trespass (many states dont allow gambling, state laws and ordinances take precendent)and laws provisioning fines to credit card and payment companies that allow transactions to online gambling go in to effect this coming year.
Other problems, much more directly related to gamers, is how quickly will people develope hacks, a farming system, or what kind of backlash will we face the first time a minor steals his parent's credit card and they cant afford the mortgage because of a videogame.
I personally think this is a terrible idea (no true means of enforcing a level playing field, no mediating presence - most gambling scenarios have a judge, dealer, etc, to vulerable to fixes - unofficial agreements between players to give them an advantage )
Reply
Other problems, much more directly related to gamers, is how quickly will people develope hacks, a farming system, or what kind of backlash will we face the first time a minor steals his parent's credit card and they cant afford the mortgage because of a videogame.
I personally think this is a terrible idea (no true means of enforcing a level playing field, no mediating presence - most gambling scenarios have a judge, dealer, etc, to vulerable to fixes - unofficial agreements between players to give them an advantage )
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 2:28PM (Unverified) said
as said before, it's not gambling because it's a game of skill.
Reply
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 8:26PM (Unverified) said
@ Vince - The when the outcome of said contest pays dividends based on an agreed wager that is gambling. skill or dumb luck (chance) it's still gambling.
Reply
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 9:59AM sand0789 said
My buddy plays a lot of Battlefield on PC. He once told me he had a hack or program or some damn thing that affected the way his PC displayed the game. What it basically did was made your enemies stand way out, even if they were behind something. He said it gave him a huge advantage when he used it, but he didn't like to use it because it put a couple bigass lines on the screen and ruined the fun.
My point is that there are plenty of hacks and cheats that can be easily used in PC games. With money at stake, you are bound to see a high percentage of them.
I actually like the idea of this game as long as it is played for very small stakes and the server isn't taking a big ol' rake.
Reply
My point is that there are plenty of hacks and cheats that can be easily used in PC games. With money at stake, you are bound to see a high percentage of them.
I actually like the idea of this game as long as it is played for very small stakes and the server isn't taking a big ol' rake.
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 10:14AM (Unverified) said
Yeah I saw the same thing happen with BF2142 except these crazy programmers got the game hacked in such a way that it was nearly undetectable by Punkbuster.
Bad thing was that I was at a Gaming Cafe (think internet cafe for gamers) and every computer had the stuff loaded up for anyone to use!!
Reply
Bad thing was that I was at a Gaming Cafe (think internet cafe for gamers) and every computer had the stuff loaded up for anyone to use!!
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 10:00AM (Unverified) said
Not to mention it should only be played in a controlled environment. Like maybe in a Casino or something. Imagine a room with a bunch of stations and then outside huge screens that display the combat to those that are waiting for just want to watch...
Reply
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 10:06AM prime8 said
what a terrible idea... there has yet to be an online shooter i've ever played that hasn't been filled with people cheating.
you might as well send envelopes full of cash to some random 14 year old who spends his day finding map glitches in gears of war
Reply
you might as well send envelopes full of cash to some random 14 year old who spends his day finding map glitches in gears of war
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 10:08AM (Unverified) said
wow... and I thought I had it bad when I was paying $15 to play an MMO. If I read this correctly they think people are willing to pay for AMMO as well as pay for entry into a game.
Reply
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 11:23AM (Unverified) said
i felt the exact same way reading it.
i guess video GAMES aren't supposed to be FUN anymore.
Reply
i guess video GAMES aren't supposed to be FUN anymore.
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 10:36AM (Unverified) said
Again, I could see this at a casino. They already have the strictest if not best network security. It could all be held internally and be just as heavily monitored as everything else. They would love it. The players are making them money by playing. The spectaters could be betting on who will win, big rollers could sponsor players that make a name for themselves. People with money would notice and so then it would actually potentially lead to something. Most major sports were built off of betting.. Right? Well boxing was from what I understand...
Reply
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 10:40AM (Unverified) said
How's this any different than online poker? I'd rather just play cards.
Reply
Posted: Sep 1st 2007 11:58PM (Unverified) said
...And the only way to kill somebody in poker is to give them a lethal paper cut to the jugular?
Reply
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 10:46AM (Unverified) said
doesn't tournament.com do something like this already? You basically play every game for cash, and whatever team has most kills at the time limit splits the pot.
Reply
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 11:25AM (Unverified) said
They also ensured that their PR guys would lawyer up some bullshit jargon to try and confuse the majority of people into buying their game.
Reply
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 11:32AM BananaBoat said
Greaaat, so now cheaters can make money by how many bullets they pump into me. That sounds like an impressive business model. Give me this same thing, on Counterstrike, but also give me admins watching the entire time to prevent cheating, and punkbuster to go one step further. Oh wait, they already did that, except without the stupid bullets cost money, and shooting people gives you money model. Once you take the fun out of games and make them about money, it's all over.
Reply
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 11:36AM (Unverified) said
now if this were done with halo 3, in a controlled setting, I could see this happening
Reply
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 11:46AM hvnlysoldr said
They could have a swear jar. Every time you swear or insult you have to pay a quarter to them. That's how they'll make money.
Reply
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 12:22PM (Unverified) said
I think this would be pretty awesome in a casino. I can't even imagine the hand cannon needed to shoot out a $300 dollar gas bill...
Reply
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 2:03PM (Unverified) said
What's with the hostility? Sounds like a decent idea to me. Just like any other kind of gambling, only a lot more interesting.
Reply
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 3:13PM ThornedVenom said
Being for or against games playing with money is a moral judgement. Being for or against fairness is another.
Reply
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 3:17PM ThornedVenom said
Only two kinds of players would spawn from this: those who are insanely good, and those who rely on hacks. But in the end, they're all losers.
As someone mentioned earlier, games are supposed to be fun. Some people consider playing with money to be fun, others consider scamming to be fun.
I call bullshit on this game outside a non-controlled environment.
Reply
As someone mentioned earlier, games are supposed to be fun. Some people consider playing with money to be fun, others consider scamming to be fun.
I call bullshit on this game outside a non-controlled environment.
Posted: Aug 31st 2007 4:55PM (Unverified) said
A little commentary:
http://lawofthegame.blogspot.com/2007/08/kwari-first-true-gambling-fps.html
Reply
http://lawofthegame.blogspot.com/2007/08/kwari-first-true-gambling-fps.html
Posted: Sep 21st 2007 11:28AM (Unverified) said
my mates dad is on the board for this game and he told me that they had made there own anti hack system because its for money and they need it full proof
Reply
Posted: Nov 11th 2007 4:38PM (Unverified) said
well, it look like it's gonna be a good idea. I was invited to beta, read posts by admins on there forum and decided I'll definitely want to play kwari. I even started to creating fan site
http://www.kwaricash.com
Reply
http://www.kwaricash.com
Posted: Nov 28th 2007 9:09AM (Unverified) said
It may be a game of skill in theory, but how long will it take for someone to circumvent that "skill matching" with alts or by purposely throwing matches against friends? The gamble might be in finding an honest opponent.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments









