| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (67)

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 1:18PM mophie said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Will the GH3 wireless guitar work with Rock Band?
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 2:35PM whymog said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think Harmonix has said they'd be fine with it if RedOctane/Activision approve it.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 1:48AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Harmonix has said the X-Plorer controller will work with Rock Band. I want to know if the Rock Band controller will work with GH2 & GH3
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 11:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So why can't they make 2 bundles? One with the wireless and one with a wire.

I fail to see how they have the customers best interest at heart when it cost more than 20 bucks to get a wireless controller so essentially it costs more this way than it would to just bundle it in the first place.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 1:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It wouldn't be so bad if the wire was long enough.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 1:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why not make 2 bundles. One wired and one wireless for the 360.

It's gonna cost the consumer more than 20 bucks to get the wireless one anyway. And that way your not stuck with a guitar you don't want.

Unless the previous guitars don't work with this game.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 2:36PM whymog said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think selling individual instrument SKUs along with an all-in-one SKU is confusing enough to consumers and retailers in Harmonix's eyes. Two "all-inclusive" bundles would confuse the average person when the individual instruments will also be available.

And it only comes with one guitar, so you can buy your second wireless if it matters that much. That's probably what I'll do.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 3:47PM copa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Also, I think $199 is a magic price point that they don't want to cross, and if bundling the wireless guitar will push it past that number, they would rather not offer the bundle.

The big question, though, is why the GH3 wireless bundles are priced identically for PS3 and XBox 360. They are both $100, which is only a reasonable $10 premium over the GH2 wired bundle.

Why is the Microsoft wireless license so onerous for Harmonix if it isn't affecting Red Octane's pricing?
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 1:23PM TONX said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
pay 20 bucks more for a wired guitar? no thank you. PS3 version for me.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 2:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
you don't pay attention much do you.

it's 20 more for the wireless.. not wired. thanks proprietary 360 wireless. ugh.

good thing the GH3 Wireless guitars will be compatible - I'm just going to use that.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 1:24PM Seroth said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's okay, I guess...though it's a little bit frustrating not to have a wireless guitar from the get-go (my plan is to buy the bundle, and buy another guitar for bass somewhere else down the line...and I guess that'll be a wireless guitar....no, wait..bass can have the wired. :P)
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 1:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i prefer wires anyway, don't have to worry about batteries dying in the middle of a game (or song in this case), or recharging/replacing. I sit about 3 ft from my 360 anyway, lol

and antec, read closer
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 1:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
What I want to know is will the wireless PS3 guitar for GH3 work for Rock Band as well (I know they have announced that it will on 360), and more importantly, will it solve the PS3's issues with playing the PS2 versions of GH and GH2?
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 1:33PM quickshade said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How is this product any more inferior than the PS3 version. it's only got wireless. Everything else is wired so whats the difference. It's the same game, same product except it has a wire....but whatever.....I'll be playing Halo 3.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 1:42PM secura said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Some people are picky about these things.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 1:47PM SpacePenguinBot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It costs more and it's not wireless, which is the opposite of what it should be. I'm still debating which version to get, but right now I'm leaning towards the PS3.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 1:42PM bantam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
screw wireless. I rather have wired simply because of batteries
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 1:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Holy Crap! People say wired all the way because of batteries. I bet more then half of you own wireless controllers, so whats the difference? Why did you pick wireless controllers? And how often does your battery run out? Charge it over night, and it wont die the next day. And WHO is playing that much that you blow through batteries on a daily basis?!
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 1:53PM Seroth said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You know, I bought an official Red Octane Wireless guitar for the PS2 in January. I haven't turn the guitar off since then (the guitar will automatically turn itself off after a while with no input), and I have yet to run out of juice on those batteries. That's 9 months SO FAR without having to replace the batteries.

But who knows...maybe the Rock Band guitar will eat batteries like a monkey moose, but I'm confident that batteries won't be that big of a deal.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 1:55PM Seroth said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Then again, I don't rock out for hours on end...maybe if some people get a little crazy, and rock a bit too long everyday, then maybe the battery issue will rear its ugly head. :P
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 2:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Out of having my PS3 since launch (well, technically, five days after... talk about a fast second shipment) and only needing to charge my batteries 3 times , I don't imagine a controller with less button inputs and similar motion sensing (provided they sprung for more than the spring in a tube connection of the original GH controllers) will somehow drain faster. Especially without rumble.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 1:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah the battery issue might come into play there but besides that they need to get some wireless guitars on the 360...But a good thing about the 360 wireless tech is the controllers....You don't get any of that knock off crap
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 1:57PM NukeAssault said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Time to cross this of the "to-get" list.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 2:38PM whymog said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Have fun not having fun, then.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 2:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You must be pretty shallow to have something as trivial as 'wired/wireless' make or break a planned purchase.
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2007 4:44PM NukeAssault said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hmm, seems although i mis wrote this. What i meant to say is im not getting the bundle. =)

Just the game itself. See Watership's post.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 2:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
See, I don't get this.

MS. EA. With Moore moving over to EA, you'd think that they'd be a bit closer bedfellows (even though it's a different division). I would think that, since this game with the current install base of the 360, will be a huge seller for EA, MS could lower it's Wireless Licensing a bit to make sure that this game stood strong and stood tall on the 360. From a business point of view, you'd be taking a loss for a greater gain. I mean, if you have Halo 3, Mass Effect (among other great 3rd-party titles), and you've got Rock Band performing with the highest quality experience (in this case, with a wireless guitar at a price that gamers can afford) it would be worth it in the long run, because it makes your console look more appealing.

Jeebus, MS, why did you have to get greedy?

...again?
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 2:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Because Xbox still hasn't returned a dime of it's investment? I have a feeling Xbox exists at this point solely for the tax writeoff.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 3:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If we're going to be honest here, had MS not had to suffer the RROD debacle, then the Xbox division would not be in the red right now, quite the contrary, it'd probably be earning profits for the company. Then again, we can't really tell how the RROD has affected the console's public appearance either.

I know there's a lot of people wary of buying the console because of it, but it's a tough thing to estimate/judge. Had the RROD not been a problem (like, say, had they fixed it right after launch), I'm sure they'd have a much larger install base.

Again, MS doesn't seem to be the smartest businessmen when it comes to these things; they stick to their guns at all the wrong times.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 2:03PM sand0789 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The ideal thing would be for it to be wireless and compatible with the play and charge kit. This kinda sucks. My GHII wired guitar doesn't reach my couch, so I have to pull my couch out to play. I didn't plan on investing in Rock Band, but still.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 2:12PM quickshade said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I do agree that we don't get the cheap knock off controllers is a nice thing. I have a few for the original Xbox that I regret buying.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 2:15PM LAZoftheTamarinds said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah this sucks for the 360 version so I'm thinking about getting the Ps3 version.

PS3 version FTW!
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 2:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well yeah, it's hard to consider the 360 version when you don't even have one....
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 2:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it'd be nice if it were wireless, but in the end it doesn't change anything. It'll be something for those with nothing better to do to complain about, but in the end it doesn't change anything.

I play gh2 with two wired guitars and a pair of nice 15" usb extenders and have no problems. So this is a non-issue to me.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 2:32PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not using BlueTooth does seem to keep coming back to stick for the 360

not in any significant way, but its there nonetheless
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 2:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For me, the PS3 version is the winner for all the following reasons.

1. Majority of my local friends are PS3 owners. Many just refused to pay, yet again, for a 360 repair. But that's neither here nor there. Essentially we'll be buying the same equipment all around.

2. I'm worried my 360 will break when I'm truly addicted. Seriously, Bioshock locked up last night, not a good sign. So the choice there is simply a matter of more reliable hardware and the knowledge that Rock Band will work with my PS4.

3. I have enough 360 games to buy this holiday season. I try to spread the love among my consoles so that the repeats of last gens don't occur again. Where I have all three consoles yet the number of games on the one outnumbers the others nearly 4:1.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 2:39PM whymog said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think it makes sense to buy a game like this on a system that most of your friends have - especially if you're not buying all the instruments yourself.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 2:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Depends. If someone is using a microwave locally, you lose connection with the controller on PS3. Other waves can temporarily disrupt connection. It happens very rarely nowadays (especially compared to launch) but it does happen. Meanwhile, my 360 controller only loses signal when it dies.

Bluetooth Advantage: Because Sony made it bluetooth, it makes it a VERY open console to peripheral support and accessories.

Bluetooth Disadvantage: Because it IS so open, it's also very open to disruption and temporary loss of signal.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 6:31PM DeadPlasmaCell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Exactly. If I had the choice i'd go with the 360's wireless.. But I'm getting the wired version cuz it's cheaper and I cord length isn't an issue
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 3:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Meh, I don't see it as a big deal. I want to buy Rock Band bundled with the drums anyway. Not buying the Rock Band guitar at all will be my form of protest. I've got an Xplorer, and when I buy GHIII I'll have a Les Paul, so I won't need a third guitar anyway. I guess I'll have to miss out on the neck buttons.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 3:08PM Sircolby45 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I am simply not buying another wired guitar. It is as simple as that. The only wired peripheral I have is the GHII guitar and I absolutely hate the wire! I can't stand wires!!!!
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 3:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hmm that's sad. I already have GH2 and pre-ordered the bundle for 360. I have no reason to buy a third guitar since I already have my previous gh2 one, so I guess I'm stuck with two wired. It would be nice if they could just throw the wireless guitar in the bundle for $20 more.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 3:13PM sqwarlock said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm a "fake guitar" whore, so I'll be buying the big bundle for Rock Band 360, an extra wireless guitar for Rock Band, the GH III 360 bundle, and that's in addition to my X-Plorer and my PS2 SG.

Sure, I could buy a PS3 with all the money I'll be spending on two games, but these games are well worth the money for all the fun they'll give me.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 4:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That is really the Rock band guitar?,Man it looks cooler than the GH guitar.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 4:13PM theBigD23 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I had originally reserved all of the 360 items individually. So for $50 extra, I'd get wireless instead of bundle. Now that I'm thinking, I think it's better to pre order the bundle and purchase the wireless controller seprately. I get a USB hub and an extra controller for $30.
Good idea?
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 4:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm still going to get it on the 360.

1. Xbox Live rocks (literally)
2. There are two other peripherals that are wired right next to you, so what does it matter?
3. Achievement points. Boo-ya.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 4:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't really see it as an inferior product because it has a wire compared to the PS3 wireless version. To be honest as much as I lose sync with my sixaxis controller from my PS3 the inferior version could end up being the PS3 version if the same sync problem continues to happen with the guitar on the PS3!
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 4:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know what is the problem with Rock band? That everyone will be over the Guitar or the Drumset, so if you don’t pre-order in time you will probably have to pick the Mic which isn’t that bad because tambourine and cowbell, because you know your band could fail without Moar Cowbell.

I don’t know if there is a Co-op online mode so you could form a band with other people in the xbox live but if there is and you wanna be popular,pick the Mic,Is probably going to be like the Monk in guild wars. Not as fun as the other characters but hey if there is a mission you are in.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2007 5:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I still find it funny that Sony of all people has the more open, third-party (peripheral) friendly system.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW