| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (34)

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 12:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's probably going to be a mindless action film where hundreds of "villains" die. No questions will be asked about the motivation of the nameless minions who are going to die. Were they forced? Do they have loved ones? No. Kill 'em all.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 2:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would rather NOT know about the characters getting killed. It makes watching these movies psychologically bearable and entertaining. If you'd prefer movie deaths to give you deep, psychological scars, watch something like Munich or Schindler's List instead.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 12:38PM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nazi science sneers at Zombie genocide.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 12:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was thinking Adam Baldwin, the actor who played Jayne Cobb in Firefly.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 12:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
DING DING!!!
Adam Baldwin is the first guy that comes to mind for me too, seems to fit that face pretty good.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 1:03PM mr nimblewick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No one plays tough/stupid like the man they call Jayne.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 2:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can't believe someone didn't see it sooner! Then again I did watch alot of X Files and FireFly...
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 12:45PM Yuccadude said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope it's Jason "steakums" Statham, just because Crank was such a good movie with him, and The Transporter was excellent as well.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 12:52PM FrankTheCrank said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wolfenstein movie...zzz...zzz...zzz

Creativity is no longer Hollyweird's strong suit...
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 12:59PM mr nimblewick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As opposed to when?
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 1:25PM FrankTheCrank said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Late 70's all through the mid 80's...

Jaws, Close Encounters, Star Wars, Empire, Indiana Jones, Back To The Future, ET....

All these movies were original and were good. Hollyweird just gave up on creativity because they would rather make a quick buck on something that's already been established. I can understand, it's business, but creativity is just dead in that environment.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 1:29PM mr nimblewick said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"Jaws, Close Encounters, Star Wars, Empire, Indiana Jones, Back To The Future, ET"

I'm seeing a theme to your list...
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 2:28PM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ahhh the good old Spielberg and Lucas
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 12:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 12:57PM nerdron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was going to say adam baldwin as well. He looks like the box art, and would be great for the role.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 1:14PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think its creepy that so many of us thought of adam baldwin.

On another note - this movie is a bad idea. Nothing gets people more angry than movies with Nazi's being shot! I can see the riots now.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 1:19PM mr nimblewick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait, are we talking about Hitler's Nazis or the rainbow sunshine Nazis?
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 1:19PM chispito said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@1 How do you think wars are ended, by understanding the inner turmoil of the common enemy soldier?
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 1:20PM mr nimblewick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nope, their ended by completely ignoring the humanity of hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 1:30PM chispito said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey Nimble:

Does "Wolfenstein" sound Japanese to you? If you really want to complain about civillian deaths in time of war, you'd have brought up Dresden, but then it's clear you have neither thought deeply about the ethics of war nor read much history if you think "hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians" refers to something in particular.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 1:43PM theBrayn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I believe he was referring to the nuklear bombs dropped on Japan during WWII. That really wasn't very hard to figure out.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 2:01PM mr nimblewick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And here I thought you would yell at me for using "their" instead of the "they're."

But anyway, please explain how my statement does not refer to anything in particular. Please.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 2:12PM Kerber said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Saving Private Ryan was inarguably more successful than Pearl Harbor. Maybe people like seeing Nazi's get killed more than they care about Japanese humanity?
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 2:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Or maybe Michael Bay is an atrocious director compared to Steven Spielberg, and "Pearl Harbor" was one of the worst war movies of all time? Just a guess...
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 2:29PM mr nimblewick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Staying on topic...

Letters from Iwo Jima was well received.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 2:30PM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Torah Torah!
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 2:30PM Kerber said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Heh, good point.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 3:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My money is on Michael Clark Duncan or Danny DeVito.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 5:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Roger Avary -- the new Uwe Boll. Only half as talented.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 7:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
then maybe the movie will be half as terrible?
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 5:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 5:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Would be hard to fuck this one up in my option.
Reply

Posted: Sep 10th 2007 5:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I say it'll go to Vin Diesel.
Reply

Posted: Sep 11th 2007 6:37AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Btw there is an another reason why I hate action films. They seek to make all the enemy "evil". 19m German men fought in the war. 2m of them in the Waffen-SS and the rest fought in the German Army. So it's hard for a rational human being can say they were all evil. I mean America did break international law when it invaded Iraq. But who wants to see a game where American soldiers are killed? The sad fact of life is. The very people who die (soldiers and civilians) are the ones who don't deserve it. While the people who do deserve to die (politicians) stay at home in comfort while soldiers are fighting for them.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW