A study found that students who had a video game player to distract them in college studied 40 minutes less and it translated to a first-semester drop of 0.241 points on a 4.0 scale. The study by two professors at Univ. of Western Ontario and Berea College wasn't looking at video games, just the effects of studying on grades. The study had 210 subjects and gathered information by having them fill out "time-use diaries."
The study says that students who had a roommate bring a game console to school showed a substantial drop in time spent studying. These students did "not exhibit different levels of class attendance, partying, study efficiency or paid employment - all factors that also could affect grades ... This means that the lower grades of students whose roommates brought video games can be attributed to the fact that these students studied less." The simple lesson to walk away from this is that if you're going to play video games, make sure it doesn't affect your study time. That's it, lesson learned.
Reader Comments (56)
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:01PM (Unverified) said
They needed to do a study for this? WTF? This is a no brain-er, if you have distractions, it is harder to have the discipline to get your work done.
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:07PM NukeAssault said
I was actually JUST talking to a teacher of mine about this. Coincidence?
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 8:26PM (Unverified) said
I actually attend the University of Western Ontario, and just took a break to browse Joystiq when I should be studying for a Calc quiz. Coincidence?
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:07PM (Unverified) said
The duty of science is to rigorously test hypotheses, not rely on assumptions. What if they had found that playing video games doesn't reduce time spent studying or grades? That's entirely possible, which is why a study is required to see which is the case.
This is pretty cool! Good thing game players didn't let it interfere with their partying. =)
Reply
This is pretty cool! Good thing game players didn't let it interfere with their partying. =)
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:11PM (Unverified) said
Dude, I know you aren't trying to justify this. There is 24 hrs in a day, anytime spent doing one this is going to take away from the time that can be spent doing something else. How the hell do you need science to figure that out?
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:17PM (Unverified) said
Well, firstly by explaining that your belief is wrong. There are other axes along which studies found that, as students spent more time, their grades improved or were unaffected. For example, employment:
http://www.acui.org/content.aspx?menu_id=122&id=2170
I repeat, the duty of science is to test hypotheses, not rely on assumptions.
Reply
http://www.acui.org/content.aspx?menu_id=122&id=2170
I repeat, the duty of science is to test hypotheses, not rely on assumptions.
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:28PM (Unverified) said
Hey David, if I stare at a wall (brick or not) for 8 hours a day, how would that effect my studying? Maybe they should do a study about that and compare it to the playing video games. I wonder which one would make my grades drop more.
My money's on the wall.
Doing a study on the obvious is NOT science.
Should they do a study on what would happen if a subject stopped drinking and eating anything?
What would happen?
100% of the time, the subject would die.
Reply
My money's on the wall.
Doing a study on the obvious is NOT science.
Should they do a study on what would happen if a subject stopped drinking and eating anything?
What would happen?
100% of the time, the subject would die.
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:30PM (Unverified) said
I replied to your response a few post down, what I said was
"What I said is not a belief, its the obvious and factual. Now in this particular situation we are talking about limited resources(time), and if I use more of those resources doing something else(playing videogames) then thats less resources that are now available to actually study"
Reply
"What I said is not a belief, its the obvious and factual. Now in this particular situation we are talking about limited resources(time), and if I use more of those resources doing something else(playing videogames) then thats less resources that are now available to actually study"
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 6:35PM (Unverified) said
He's right. It may seem obvious, but there are a lot of instances where the "common sense" answer is not necessarily accurate.
This isn't about whether or not playing video games "spends" time. Obviously, anything you do will "spend" time. It's whether or not playing videogames is correlated with more or less time studying, and better or worse grades. As with all correlational studies, it is not necessarily causal (I should also note that this studies people who's ROOMMATES brought game machines to college their Freshman year, and not the game machine owners themselves. It'd be interesting to see if this affect only occurs to the unsuspecting, typically non-game playing roommate, or also with the game machine owner himself).
People that are saying this is really stupid and "obvious" are not thinking about this correctly. Yes, there are 24 hours in a day, but the amount of time people study is typically far less than this. Say the average student studies 3 hours a day (outside class). So, according to this study, students that play videogames would average 2:20 hours a day of study.
You could do another study that looked at (as someone else did) how much someone reads, and correlate that with how much studying they do.
The point is, there are plenty of things that can be done in a day, some which might affect how much you study and others which may not. Just because you do something OTHER than study doesn't necessarily mean that it would reduce your normal amount of "studying".
That being said, the Diablo II expansion did cause me to actually abandon an "Independent Study" I was doing in College. Totally worth it.
-Jeff
http://alinktothefuture.com
Reply
This isn't about whether or not playing video games "spends" time. Obviously, anything you do will "spend" time. It's whether or not playing videogames is correlated with more or less time studying, and better or worse grades. As with all correlational studies, it is not necessarily causal (I should also note that this studies people who's ROOMMATES brought game machines to college their Freshman year, and not the game machine owners themselves. It'd be interesting to see if this affect only occurs to the unsuspecting, typically non-game playing roommate, or also with the game machine owner himself).
People that are saying this is really stupid and "obvious" are not thinking about this correctly. Yes, there are 24 hours in a day, but the amount of time people study is typically far less than this. Say the average student studies 3 hours a day (outside class). So, according to this study, students that play videogames would average 2:20 hours a day of study.
You could do another study that looked at (as someone else did) how much someone reads, and correlate that with how much studying they do.
The point is, there are plenty of things that can be done in a day, some which might affect how much you study and others which may not. Just because you do something OTHER than study doesn't necessarily mean that it would reduce your normal amount of "studying".
That being said, the Diablo II expansion did cause me to actually abandon an "Independent Study" I was doing in College. Totally worth it.
-Jeff
http://alinktothefuture.com
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:07PM (Unverified) said
Hmm... they might also have found that people who watch television, read books, play sports, or do anything other than study spend less time studying.
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:08PM (Unverified) said
Video Games are directly responsible for every A- I ever got. Seriously.
Also, Diablo2 taught me a LOT about understanding percentages.
Reply
Also, Diablo2 taught me a LOT about understanding percentages.
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:09PM (Unverified) said
Sad...needed a study to figure out WHAT ALL OF US ALREADY KNEW FOR YEARS. And what do they mean "partying"? Since when was partying apart of the education process? Isn't that a distraction too?
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:09PM (Unverified) said
There isn't any words that can discribe how assinine this study is. So you are telling me that a group of people, probably with years and years of education conducted a study to state the obvious? What are they going to tell me next, that I will go blind if I gaze at the sun for to long?
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:21PM (Unverified) said
Agreed! It seems to me that for every year that goes by in this new millennium, the general public gets dumber and dumber. "Duh, it's Samsonite! I was way off."
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:10PM (Unverified) said
This December Brawl is coming out
It's kinda obvious how that's gonna affect my studying for finals.
Reply
It's kinda obvious how that's gonna affect my studying for finals.
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:15PM (Unverified) said
Yeah i remember when i was in school i wasnt aloud to take craps becuase it took away from my study time, actually i dont remember eating or taking showers either.
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:16PM (Unverified) said
A new study reveals that the act of not-studying is directly correlated with less time spent studying.
The cause has yet to be identified...
Reply
The cause has yet to be identified...
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:20PM (Unverified) said
The study simply proves the obvious, which is not always a bad thing.
I mean, the test could have shown that kids study the same amount, but sleep less do to gaming at night, after studying is done.
And this could show a drop in grades due to lack of sleep.
Its entirely plausible. All this does is pinpoint things a bit more.
Remember, things aren't always as they seem.
Reply
I mean, the test could have shown that kids study the same amount, but sleep less do to gaming at night, after studying is done.
And this could show a drop in grades due to lack of sleep.
Its entirely plausible. All this does is pinpoint things a bit more.
Remember, things aren't always as they seem.
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:17PM (Unverified) said
Study says: Studies conducted on the obvious waste resources.
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:18PM D3m0sthenes said
This just in!
WINDOWS affect studying time!
BAN TEH WINDOWS!!!
BTW, I went to a high school with no windows...
Reply
WINDOWS affect studying time!
BAN TEH WINDOWS!!!
BTW, I went to a high school with no windows...
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:53PM Yuccadude said
Yeah, I remember in high school if I got bored, I would just sit and stare out the window the rest of the class. The days when it was raining was the best, because you could watch the rain hit the roof and make little concentric circles with the ripples. But I still listened to my teacher because he was a good guy, just got a little boring some days.
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:24PM (Unverified) said
Wait hold on a second, your saying if I spend time doing something other than studying then my study time will be less? Whoa! That just hit me. Seriously though, I wouldn't say just video games cause less studying, theres so many distractions in college, you just gotta find a place where you can study in peace with minimal distraction.
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:22PM (Unverified) said
What I said is not a belief, its the obvious and factual. Now in this particular situation we are talking about limited resources(time), and if I use more of those resources doing something else(playing videogames) then thats less resources that are now available to actually study.
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 7:20PM JoshMilewski said
Oh crap, same here. I have a test on Friday...Good point.
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:25PM (Unverified) said
What I said is not a belief, its the obvious and factual. Now in this particular situation we are talking about limited resources(time), and if I use more of those resources doing something else(playing videogames) then thats less resources that are now available to actually study
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:26PM (Unverified) said
i'm on a videogame course at uni, so when im NOT gaming im slacking off.
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:28PM (Unverified) said
damn i would have graduated with a 3.8 if it wasn't for video games.
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:28PM (Unverified) said
Geez, the research people waste money on these days.
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:41PM (Unverified) said
Me too. Hey what's this, Joystiq and Picross?
::games for 36 hours, dies::
Reply
::games for 36 hours, dies::
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:40PM Mr Khan said
I'd say sites like this and other gaming community/culture/news sites are the bigger draw on study time
I already have daily "game time" set aside each weekday, however, with such websites but a click away, and most of my schoolwork done via PC, going online really fucks with work time, at least in my case
Reply
I already have daily "game time" set aside each weekday, however, with such websites but a click away, and most of my schoolwork done via PC, going online really fucks with work time, at least in my case
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 7:22PM JoshMilewski said
Same thing here. I seem to hardly play games as much as a read about them anymore. Like you said, it's far to easy to say, Well, let's check Joystiq for a few minutes... every few minutes.
Reply
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:45PM (Unverified) said
i wonder if the inverse is the same
does studying affect my gaming time?
now i need to get a grant and a lab coat.
Reply
does studying affect my gaming time?
now i need to get a grant and a lab coat.
Posted: Sep 19th 2007 5:47PM (Unverified) said
According to the post, it says students whose ROOMATES brought consoles to school suffered in studying and therefore grades. That leads me to believe that those students who actually BROUGHT the console are experienced gamers (Dare I say like those who read this site). These people probably know how to manage their time.
Either that, or they couldn't be torn away from their games to participate in some study!!
Reply
Either that, or they couldn't be torn away from their games to participate in some study!!
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 221 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 161 comments
- Blizzard taking Valve to court over 'DOTA' trademark 117 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments









