| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (52)

Posted: Sep 19th 2007 1:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Multiplayer looks "almost as good" as single player?

I thought we were done with games that had worse graphics on multiplayer? That's so N64! Does Gears have worse graphics on multiplayer? Or Halo 3? No!

Who ever heard of splitting a game's multiplayer and single player? I guess you have to double dip when there are only 4.6 million PS3 owners in the entire world...

PS3 owners are paying out the ass for an experience that doesn't even come close to any of its competitors.

Posted: Sep 19th 2007 8:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
or maybe because they games are two different things? perhaps 2 different teams? perhaps people interseted in mgs4 dont give a shit about the online part? (like mgs3 and PO) and by the way, my comp, when i built it last year came to ~$900, now it would cost between 600-700. i run Bioshock,Oblivion,FEAR , and others on high. soooo, if youre dumb enough to believe you need to spend $2000 for 360 quality graphics, well youre dumb.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW