| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (78)

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:04AM SuperTuna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yikes - Big N is watching.

Oh and this has to be a hoax because there are no girls on the intarweb OR working in the gaming industry :P
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:16AM britboyj27 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Soooo... was she a booth babe? "Technical Recruiter" sounds something like that...

And damn...
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:06AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Hot.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 10:33AM FrankTheCrank said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
She's the human sex doll.

Look at the second photo on her blog. She looks like a real live sex doll. lol.

I would take her for a spin around the block...then throw her out of the car.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 10:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Holy hell! Ha ha ha...
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 11:04AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Too much make up, but you can still tap it from the back.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 11:38AM The Wicker Man said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
looked hot in the first photo second one was a bit freakish. She must be reffering to Perrins beard eh?
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 11:42AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Perrin Kaplan is a stone cold fox.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 6:38PM NintendoFanbot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Perrin Kaplan is the Alpha Mom. You don't mess with Alpha Moms.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:07AM Fernando Rocker said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I just check the blog... she is hot!
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:09AM Fernando Rocker said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I wish I was Reggie: "If you want to keep your job, you know what job you need to do me first"
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:13AM fwacce said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Piece of advice Fernando... Stop refreshing joystiq over and over in order to get your lame comments posted quickly, and go outside in the sun and find yourself a real, live human girl.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:14AM Fernando Rocker said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
fwacce

I'm married, kid.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:25AM Korova Pamplona said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
She has what we in the industry call a working mouth.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:31AM NightElve said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Then take care of your wife instead of being a troll here 24/7.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 3:20PM hotpuck6 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
agreed on that,
we need more gorgeous women that are at least partially in the industry, even if from an outside contractor.
it will finally remove the stigma of people who have any sort of involvement in video games are fat, pimped, and generally overall unsociable.

I mean look at the examples we have now... anyone at the top of Sony is usually a wrinkly old japanese prune. Reggie looks like a Neanderthal. We had peter moore looking like a normal guy, then he gets stolen by EA, to only get replaced by "nerd of the year" looking jeff bell. i mean come on. COME ON!!!
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 3:37PM Arkv2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Poor woman...
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 5:32PM The Wicker Man said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You are married to the badge.
Reply

Posted: Oct 2nd 2007 10:55AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fwacce he's a stay at home dad IMO.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The temptation to make a Wii joke is almost too much...
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:14AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm sure she can capitalise on all the publicity and get a job with Sony/MS.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:17AM jsgrill said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
First rule of blogging - Don't blog about your employer and expect to keep your job.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:29AM foxhound said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Or rather, don't blog at work. :p If she was doing it from home and not releasing/disclosing any kind of trade secrets, then they shouldn't be able to drop the hammer on her. And if that chick's that much of a blankety-blank bi'atch, she should've took the complaint to HR.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 10:15AM Duke said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yes they can fire her. It's "at will" employment and you don't need a reason to fire someone. She was posting nasty comments on coworkers, which if they read, would make working with her uncomfortable. Besides, they have a work environment to protect. People think they can do whatever they want and have no work repercussions – that’s just not the case.

She deserved to be fired for talking about coworkers like that and they were in the right for dumping her.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
She was not fired for blogging. Rather she was fired for slagging off her boss in her blog. Big difference.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:37AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bad-mouthing the boss on your blog is called "blogging about work," and it was for that blogging that she was fired. Had she written about it in her private diary (or "gournal," if you will) and not shown anyone, she'd still have the job. So, the blogging part is really the important bit.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:27AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
sounds like anonymity was a big concern of hers good thing she didnt put a PICTURE OF HERSELF IN HER BLOG!!!!

pwned
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:32AM baby sea tuna said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Haven't people learned yet that their employers do pay attention to what they say or do on the Internet, even on their off hours?

Dumbass.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
id hit it
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report

Oh well, i don't feel sorry for the stupid bitch! Every job has it's pains, she worked at Nintendo for crying out loud, sign me up for that! She just sounds like a whiny ungrateful bitch to me, she deserved to get canned!
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:50AM falcomadol said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I'm pretty sure that everyone at Microsoft blogs, from Ray Ozzie right down to the guy at Mini-microsoft.

Heck, Microsoft even has a directory of blogs written by Microsoft employees:

http://www.microsoft.com/communities/blogs/PortalHome.mspx
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 4:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes - but you can be sure they don't speak badly about their bosses. Those Microsoft employee blogs are usually technical in nature, not personal. And they keep the NDA stuff off them, too.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 9:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
She's alright - a little full of herself but most bloggers who claim to be writers tend to drone on about how critical they think they are to the rest of us. You know what Jessica? You should take your top off. Now THATS interesting.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 10:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
agreed
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 10:20AM JonahFalcon said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Jessica Zenner wins the lottery. There's laws against this - it's called "The First Amendment".

Ka-ching!
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 6:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The constitution protects one from the government not private persons.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 10:26AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
There has to be something unconstitutional about being fired for such an abstract reason. What about free speech? According to the article she followed all the protocols as far as not naming names. So is Nintendo next going to fire people because they once played Sega in their past? Going with the logic of this case, they would fire you because they suspected you tried a Sega product at least once in your life.

-BF
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 10:47AM Duke said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Free speech is not a claim you make versus a private company, I can inhibit your free speech if you work for me, such as through an agreement not to talk trade secrets. Free speech is a constitutional protection, which means it constrains the federal government from acting to take your speech rights without there being a compelling interest and a reaction that is narrowly tailored to serve it.

A private corporation only has to answer to a constitutional claim if there is government involvement, such as the US telling Nintendo to shut someone up.

So no, there is no constitutional angle here. People too often confuse free speech with being some universal right you can claim against anyone. Its not.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 10:49AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Blue

Someone mentioned that her employment is "at will". In my state it is the same way. What this means is they can fire your ass and not have a reason. This is how I see this played out. She probably wasn't well liked around the office to begin with. If she is spouting off on her blogs about her fellow employees and bosses, she probably had the same piss poor attitude at work. So all they (meaning managment) had to do was wait for her to come close to violating any company policy then drop the hatchet.

What a dumb bitch. You don't like your job, find a new one and quit wasting everybody's time. Suck it up. Has America become a collective gathering of whiners and babies? I'm going to go poop now.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 10:44AM M4L said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Anonymity?

How can this be if you have pictureS of yourself on the blog?

What got her fired was the slander toward the boss of the person in the picture but more importantly the inappropriate pictures, and there were some f’ed up ones.

These pictures were not suitable for someone who works for a respectable establishment and especially for a mother of a 3 year old kid. The husband will not be happy once he gets back from Iraq.

The above entry is not only old news, it is not even accurate.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 1:06PM Paviel said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Technically, what she did would be considered libel rather than slander.

Not that I'd expect many people to know the difference...
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 1:23PM D3m0sthenes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thank you High School Government! There is a difference but it really doesn't matter much anymore, it's pretty much the same thing.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 10:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They shouldn't have fired her. All they've done is call attention to her comments. They could have handled it by talking to her in private and then asking her to remove the offending posts. Of course, her boss would probably hate her either way.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 10:48AM Duke said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Her action showed disloyalty to the group she works with and would create rifts between them. I think its totally justified to can her rather than have the problem fester and grow.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 10:58AM Slaziman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
She isn't even that hot
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 11:39AM Aperture said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
agreed
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 2:55PM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
She's hot in that slutty "use me" sort of way.

Not someone you'd want to take home to mom.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 11:04AM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Before the kids start bitching about Nintendo, keep in mind that something similar happened to a blogger that worked at Sony and was fired for it.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 12:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seriously, why did you have to bring up Sony?
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2007 11:42AM Duoae said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hmmm.. Personally i don't think she should have been fired for this - if she was fired for it and not general lack of work.

First off, complaining about an unnamed person is not slander since said person is not named.
Secondly she posted under a pseudonym and unless she was regularly posting pictures of herself under her real name somewhere else then no one would make the connection - therefore her complaining about "a company" and "people she works with" was completely harmless venting.

The only way Nintendo could have discovered the blog is if she posted at work and they monitored this activity - which is a little stupid for her to be doing - and if her boss/co-workers where able to monitor this activity as well.... which might be a little controversial since usually HR insists a specially delegated and not-involved person would be responsible for this job. So in reality her co-workers would/should never have found out about this unless she was making death threats or something illegal.

Considering that over here, you can't even really phone an ill co-worker because it's harassment then i would expect something similar about divulging her internet activities to her boss.

Whether or not her actions showed disloyalty (What world do you live in?) to the group or company etc is irrelevant as long as she did her job and was civil to the people she worked with.
I have to also say that most people do not enjoy the job that they do. Unfortunately there isn't some sort of magical system whereby people only take the jobs that they like the most. This is the real world here - you take what you can get that pays well. If you enjoy it then that's a bonus. Some of the people's reactions here seem to be complete and utter hatred for no other reason that she's either female/"attractive" or worked for a company they wished they worked for.

I personally believe that a company has no grounds to fire you if you are doing your job - everyone has a right to complain and if no names are named and it's done anonymously then there is no harm at all. It's like people don't realise that the internet has become another form of communication and gossip. People always gossip and that won't go away. Rumours could still be spread before the introduction of the internet and having an anonymous blog complaining about the boss won't affect anything.

Maybe the boss/Nintendo should learnt to take criticism? Or maybe they're too busy not caring about their employees anyway judging from the whole PR dept move in the US.

Amazing.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW