| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (48)

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 9:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
it always sounded cool, but i'll just wait for a 360 port
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 9:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
keep dreaming. but yeah it is awesome. i would spent the 50 dollars on just whats in the beta.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 12:37AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
More like a PS3 port...No way can this be done on the 360.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 1:18AM Demon G Sides said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
No way it could be done on a PS3 then.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 1:43AM DeathChimp2000 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You kids can laugh all you want, but there's a new era dawning in PC to console ports. It started with Quake IV on the 360. Sure, the game had a tendency to chug like a bastard, but don't ignore this: It was, I believe, the first time a triple-a PC game shipped almost at the same time to a console, and without losing any levels, features, etc.

And many of the big PC titles are being developed in tandem with console versions, or getting good ports. Bioshock, F.E.A.R., Oblivion, COD 4, Orange Box, and the list goes on. Core PC titles like RTSs seem to be one of the few exceptions.

Granted, in most cases the PC version will be superior. But in the last gen, a console port could be anywhere between 50-80% as good as the PC version. This gen ports are generally achieving a 80-95% fidelity with the PC versions.

If you already have a High-end gaming PC, or it's within your means to upgrade, PC could be the way to go. But if you've got a console, HDTV, and surround sound, you'll get almost the same experience with with the port.

Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 9:15AM SoulBlade said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
wow this site is lame. someone says the 360 can't handle it, and it gets voted down. someone retorts that it couldn't be done a ps3, and it gets voted up.

quality stuff you guys. don't know about the ps3's capabilities, but if halo couldn't run native at 720p without burning up the GPU, then i don't think it'll do Crysis without hurting the experience. plus the 360 doesn't even have the capabiltiies of full dx10 and Crysis is meant to take full advantage of it.

i wonder how long it will take for me to get voted down. maybe if i end with ps3 sucks, it'll be ok.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 12:42PM Nuisance said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He got voted down because he said that the PS3 could handle it. Which it can, just not well. I'm just hoping for an N64 port, which seems just as likely.
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 9:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Three... three sixty port?

*snicker*

*dies of laughter*
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 9:45PM nmezib said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, earlier Cevat Yerli (Crytek CEO) stated that the PS3 and 360 could never handle the ultimate pwnz0rage that is Crysis, but last month or so he retracted that statement, saying if Crysis does well in sales on the PC, they'd consider doing a console port for the game as well.

Of course, it'd have to be optimized to hell, but the simple fact that they went back on their statements that Crysis will be a PC only game makes me (someone who dropped $1500 to build a rig to play this game... and others) a sad panda.
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 11:24PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@mmezib

sssh. Don't say that. You'll hurt pc fanboys feelings since they think people still care about the pc.
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 11:40PM dustandechoes91 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
psh like it could ever handle it
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 1:26AM Mister said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
360 and PS3 both exceed the minimum requirements and meets the recommended GPU and CPU requirements.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 1:33AM NaeemTHM said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
OK am I the only person that remembers that the xbox had a port of Half Life 2? Remember when Half Life 2 was last generations Crysis and made your computer explode at the highest setting??

Well even though the port was poop, it was still ON the xbox. So I have no doubt in my mine Crysis will make it's way to 36o, if the game does well enough.

and PS people: PS3=360...stop being brain washed by all this "PS3 is uber powerful" bullshit.
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 9:47PM TwistedBishop said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I'm sure it will come to consoles. It won't look nearly as good as it does on a high-end rig, much like it won't for most of the PC people who buy it, but still.
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 9:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i don't think there will be a 360 port... or PS3 version for that matter...

this game is windows vista's savior... one that will show off capabilities of direct x 10...

hell... this game looks waaaaaaaaaaayyyy better than killzone 2... or halo 3.... hahaha!!
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 5:49AM Optimaximal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If it's destined for Games For Windows, it'll be on the 360 within a year - GFW is a grooming program for games destined for the 360, seeing as the requirments of the GFW brand are 360-pad compatibility, native widescreen support and scalability to work on lesser machines.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 12:47PM Nuisance said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nope, 360 pad support is unfortunately not a requirement. Stranglehold completely ignores the existince of my 360 pad. Just as well though, since its the worse console to PC port made, and runs like a rock through a paper shredder.
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 9:58PM thethirdmoose said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This would be so cool on the wii
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 1:19AM Demon G Sides said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Win for the sheer irony.
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 9:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Who cares if there's a console port? Look at how bad, and late, Far Cry came.

But thank you guys for posting this hands-on. I've been nervous about Crysis; I don't blow my 50$ easily, and beautiful graphics alone wouldn't have been enough.
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 10:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
how much did it cost to upgrade your computer to play this?


that's the reason i don't wanna play it on PC, because mine is probably just barely good enough to play it, and i don't want vista anytime soon either
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 10:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wasn't starting a pc/console argument.

Just saying that the port will probably be bad, so who cares?

Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 10:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
man they named this game "cry"sis because that's what you'll do when this game EXPLODES YOUR COMP.
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 10:28PM PixelPerfect said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Woah sounds awesome.
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 10:46PM SoulBlade said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
must have - glad i upgraded my PC - it was due. Got the better Bioshock, will get the better Orange Box, and will certainly get Crysis.
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 11:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's like trying to port Half Life 2 to the Sega Saturn.
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 11:38PM Infamous2J said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh dats cold! Dats really cold!
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 11:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, how much would a PC rig cost to play this thing? Or even a top of the line Mac Pro w/ Boot Camp when they put the new (Penryn?) chip with whatever top (I know, I know) graphics card?
This game has me salivating, but I'm guessing I'll never see it run in its full glory.
Now I know how Tantalus felt -- he must have been a PC gamer.
Regardless, great hands-on guys.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 12:53PM Nuisance said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My PC, fully capable of playing this game, cost about $500 going by the current prices on Newegg. For around the price of a Wii, you can upgrade to play anything out currently at high settings, and Crysis around medium-high.

A Mac however, will always be overpriced.
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 11:54PM octoberasian said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This would be only reason I'd get Vista. Of course, I'll have dual boot to XP as well for my next PC. Vista would only be DirectX 10 only and nothing more.

Just. need. a. new. PC. now. T_T

I'm waiting for RV670 or RV700 from AMD and the Phenom FX to be released before I do a full upgrade. XD
Reply

Posted: Oct 8th 2007 11:58PM madgamer7 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really wish Apple didn't pack a 7300 with the Mac Pros :( I really want this game but I had enough trouble getting Bioshock to work (and it still ocasionally reboots my computer)
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 12:48AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, it would appear pc gaming is now for only the privileged few who can afford it. And please don't give me that crap that you 'just built a sweet $1000 rig that will run it just fine', because you are a liar. When it comes time, will anyone be able to afford to cross that uncanny valley?
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 1:21AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
just wait a few years, the equipment to run it will be cheaper, as will the game
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 9:21AM TwistedBishop said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You actually can build a powerful system (Quad Core CPU, 8800 card, 2GB RAM) from the ground up for $1000. Seriously, go price it at NewEgg if you don't believe me.

Of course, the bigger question is whether spending $1000 to play Crysis is a wise investment of your gaming dollar.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 11:16AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Eh, honestly, almost every dollar I put into my PC for gaming, I'd have put into it just for the sake of having a good computer.

A gaming computer equals the computer you would buy (x) + a good videocard ($400). That makes it about even with the consoles =P
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 2:09AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I suppose your right if history is any teacher, but it would be nice just to be able to pop it in my pc and have it look the way its meant to look on day one. Then again, I still enjoy me some Starcraft, so its not all bad :}
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 2:26AM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm actually planning on upgrading my PC sometime this holiday for UT3... I guess I'll get this game too.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 3:45AM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This game only awakened my interest because of its CryEngine demo. But besides that, meh. I think I'll wait for Far Cry 2 in that case.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 5:51AM Optimaximal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Far Cry 2 isn't using the same engine, rather it's using some in-house technology called 'Dunia'. The only connection to Far Cry is the name.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far_Cry_2
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 6:04AM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thanks for the heads up! I'll be looking forward to Dunia then!
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 4:17AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would just like to give a heads up to the people that think of buying a new (vista) pc to play this game on. Even if you want to dual boot xp.

The thing is, it is mighty hard to get the xp version working.

I have a new computer with an nvidia motherboard, and tried to downgrade to xp since I got some issues with vista (Visual studio and other programs moaned too much). When I finally completed the downgrade, I started looking for drivers for motherboard, sound, graphics...Most of you probably know the drill.

At start, everything went smoothly. I found drivers for almost everything, except for one piece of hardware. The motherboard.
Mind you, everything 'works' without the motherboard, but your sound won't come out, your graphics driver will sputter and ram-intensive programs will request human sacrifices to keep working. I searched quite long for drivers, but couldn't find any.

Last note: If you don't believe me, that is fine. Try it yourself, or just surf to nvidia and look up their policy on Vista. They try to make everyone use it (which is understandable, from a bussiness point of view).

tl;dr
Don't buy a new computer with the thought of dual booting, drivers won't work.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 9:05AM Serious Kriss said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
People expecting a direct port of Crysis on consoles will be very dissapointed, unles they thought Far Cry Instincts / Predator was "just as good as Far Cry".
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 9:11AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I dont think Crysis will be ported to consoles, if it does its going to be a Far Cry for consoles, a very horrible ported game that make me wonder...will Crytek do the same thing...? hmm noo i dont think Crytek will destroy Crysis reputation because consoles gamers want to have it on their consoles, and at the end if they decide to do it, well half experience of the PC game its not funny....
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 9:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not the type to comment. I am not a PS fanboy, the opposite if anything. I dont own one and never will. I have a super rigged PC waiting for this game though. But... 360 could not handle this game. It just couldn't handle the game, let alone have enough space on the disc. PS3 is capable of handling this game, though it is unlikely it would be pulled off correctly because no one seems to go the extra mile to get the raw power outta the PS3. Long story short, if this game makes you nips hard, I suggest building a rig now. You won't play this on consoles anytime in the near future.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 11:22AM Serious Kriss said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The PS3 suffers from the same RAM restrictions as the 360, so I don't think it's more capable than the 360 to run Crysis. Outdated RAM is actually what Yerli said was the main problem with current consoles.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2007 12:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know, I used to be a PC fanboi, always getting the latest and greatest (well, 1 step down because there was no way I'd spend $600 on a video card), updating my drivers, finding the NoCD cracks so I could play without the damn disc in the drive, etc.

Nowadays, I can't be bothered. I have an XBox, a 360, and a Wii (as well as a GBA-SP, a DSLite, and a PSP-1000), and there's just no way I'm going to spend $1000 to upgrade my PC to play a game. I'd rather spend the money on a new sofa set, or a new LCD TV, or ...a new suit (ack!).

You know what? I'd much rather they took the time and ported it over to the 360. I might not get the "full" experience, but I'd rather save the $1000 and enjoy the game on my 52" HDTV, from my sumo beanbag, with my 600W surround sound and wireless controller.

AoD
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 12:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The console port of Far Cry was lousy because of the gameplay. The graphics weren't ecxactly sweet either, but try to go back up and read the editor's bit again. Their main focus seems to be on the sweet, sweet gameplay :) - which COULD be ported, if they'd invest enough time in it.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 12:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"The physics deserve special merit"? Except that... a bullet will not cause a gas tank to explode!

http://kwc.org/mythbusters/2004/07/mythbusters_scuba_diver_in_a_f.html

Okay, I realize that's not the physics you were talking about.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW