| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (51)

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 8:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Thats why videogame based movies don't work, they still have no regard for the source material it's based on
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2007 9:55AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
if it had Jason Statham in it, it would still kick ass.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2007 12:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hollywood has no respect for any source material ever.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2007 12:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hollywood has no respect for any source material ever. Video game, book, other movie, musical, or cave painting.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 8:36PM Deprincer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is appalling.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 8:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you follow Hollywood's film industry much it isn't that surprising considering how they suck any dick that comes around that says "do this and you'll make your return on this film". I'm pretty fucking mad about it though since I already hate FOX (no not the TV network branch...actually I do but unrelated) and this WAS looking to be good.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 8:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Are you telling me that a movie based on a game about being a contract killer is violent?
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 10:11PM mcarage said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No of course not all heroes in pg-13 movies should be looked up to and copied by kids.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 8:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If this be true then this be gay. I don't mean homosexual. I mean effin' gay.

Whadya expect from Hollywood, anyways? Hopefully it's better than Alvin and the Chipmunks.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 9:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
that's not pc dude
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 9:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thanks JanJan.

How come you didn't go pick on blooh? Go eff yourself.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 11:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Man I thought on so many funny a$$ jokes but I will post them later where the moral police and the internet patrol can't get me.

So I will just agree with playwhutyalike saying yep that's sucks.

Seriously the guy they picked couldn’t look more like a well ya know also wasn't Agent 46 some sort of Anti-hero really why PG13? The only people that would care about a Hitman movie would be the fans and as a fan I wouldn’t go watch it.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 8:40PM LAZoftheTamarinds said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Well this pretty much sucks. I just hope it remains faithful to the games and it is good. But the way other videogame movies are I don't have such high expectations. Still I might rent it.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 8:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well to be honest I already gave up on the movie when I saw who was playing the main character I mean, come on!
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 9:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
HAHA, i just looked it up, it's the bad guy from die hard 4. coincidence? but he sure doesn't look anything like agent 47, even if he shaved his head. the hitman is like 45 years old and is very skinny and pale. christian bale might've made a decent agent 47, esp. with his experience in american psycho
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2007 10:11AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
word christian bale is my fav actor. he would be incredible but they cant afford that kind of star power.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 9:01PM jocozo3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm amazed that it's even a concern. Disregarding that it's based on a game, it's a movie about a hitman. An assassin. A paid murderer. Why wouldn't you just go into it thinking it was going to be R-rated violent? I hope they aren't doing this (if it's true) just because it's game based and therefore some younger folks might be fans...
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 9:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Did you by any chance implied that people who aren't even supposed to be playing the game, could be fans of it?

(Also, how would parents reply to their kids when they ask for the game the movie's based on?)
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 9:26PM jocozo3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sorta, but all I'm really saying is that I hope they don't think something is kid's stuff just because it's a game.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 9:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
GAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY



also dan, weren't the games rated M? if you're old enough to play the games you're old enough to see a R movie...
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 9:18PM jocozo3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Definitely, blooh. I'm just hoping that some executive isn't thinking that just because it's a game, regardless of it's rating, it must be kid's stuff and therefore they have to get a PG-13.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 9:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And this is why the movie will join Live Free and Die Hard in my netflix queue. I'm not paying to see some watered down crap.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 9:47PM LOLiB said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Honestly Live Free or Die Hard was a VERY awesome movie, just cause someone face doesnt get cut in half or they say the n word every two seconds (DieHard w/ Vegence im looking at you) wont make it a bad film. Live Free was an awesome action packed film that was critically liked.


On subject thought, something like Hitman should be rated R, but I might not go to hell as fast as you think, but what from Joystiq says the director uses alot of violence to make a good film, it might turn out to be bad if thats the case.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 10:38PM LAZoftheTamarinds said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I also thought Die Hard 4 was a good movie. Very cool.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2007 9:32AM AirIntake said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Live Free or Die Hard was the worst attempt at a sequel I've seen in quite a while. If you think that it was a good movie, please watch the original again. The timing of 4 never got flowing due to the shoddy edits.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 9:19PM JoseElMaton said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Am I the only one here planning to avoid this movie, lest it screw with my perception of my beloved Mr. 47? Love those games...
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 9:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Wait Wait Wait. Your telling me that a movie about a guy who kills people FOR MONEY was going to be rated R? What did the execs think this was? Hes a HITMAN. He kills people. In cold blood. He sneaks up and shoots them in the back. He poisons. He chokes with fiber wire. This is not a pg-13 movie!
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 9:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
let's start an internet petition to get the original director back! lol, rabble rabble!
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 9:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Soon enough we'll get Hitman: The Movie: The Game, with the violence cut out and Agent 47 based on the movie version. Stupid people will buy it and write off the Hitman series.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 10:27PM ZippyDSMlee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
and comic movies are better? they rape the content and rework it to try and feed it as many brain dead 12-29's they can,anyone outside the demographic who goes to see it is just extra double kills.

Of coarse it could be worse hollywood takes it makes it R only and rapes it down to being posh goth inspired trash like Blade....*shudders*

really must they take it and make it into "insert sub culture chive here" trash?

Ghost rider with the metrosexaul vampire demons was cute as well....or a teen adventure flick where the robot stars are bit charatcers.......makes emo spidy 3 look great....


my god and hollywood wonders why they are having profit issues, prehaps if they did not rape and give the limp corpse of the IP/CP a dirty sanchez then more people would I dunno watch their sht and feel like paying for it and not feel feel like they were robed of time after watching it.......


AAAAAAAAAAAAAHGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!
and to think gaming is heading in that direction...*sigh*
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 11:26PM EMaster said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Spidey 3 = Chickflick. Stan Lee = Sell Out. Hollywood = Bullshit. People = should stop paying for movies like these.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2007 12:18AM ZippyDSMlee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
why is it I can reply to myself and not others?
joystiq...fix yo shizzle....

Anyway
EMaster
whos not a sell out if the money is right? 0-o
A PG rated Halo thats abotu as "graphic" as the old starwars would be prefect for the current fcked up system we find ourselfs in.

mirage
movies are the holy grail of media ,you can't blame it no tis the games that making stupid people stupid >
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 9:47PM rpboyer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I might be concerned about this if I wasn't already sure that this movie will be a certified piece of $#%&. So now you have a piece of crap with a PG-13 rating so that (technically) more people can pay to see it than would pay to see the R rated piece of crap. Enjoy.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 10:26PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
NOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!

But wait, remember Live Free and Die hard was watered down to a pg-13 rating, and that was the best one in the series. So maybe it could still be good?
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 11:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
HAHAHAHAHAHA

sorry, but die hard 4 was only slightly better than number 2, and both of course take a back seat to 1 and 3
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2007 9:53AM AirIntake said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
4 was not the best. Not if you like Die Hard movies. 2 sucked ass, but was still better than 4 just due to better timing and editing.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2007 1:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The movie looks dreadful.

Hitman is a STEALTH game.....You are an assassin. Our goal is silent assassin. You poison, sneak, snap neck, hide bodies, use unorthodox method like sabatoging grills.

You NEVER go guns blazing like the movie says. That is mass murdered, not assassin.

I think Hitman isn't terribly violent. I mean the you kill drugs lord, CP ring leader, killers and even vice-presidents planning to kill the president. All people who got what was coming to them.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 4:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fucking lame! This reminds me of how Fox did Alien Vs Predator. PG-13? WTF!! I am a huge fan of the original comics and books, yet they watered down the movie (it still rocked though...12/25/07 for AVP 2!!). I mean where the hell was the predator decapitating mofos? Anyway, I am not a fan of the hitman series but this is stupid. The game is not for young people.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2007 9:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
at least #2 is rated R. Have you seen the previews (which are restricted as well) Movies looks pretty damn violent!
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 10:55PM pabloshong said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i think i speak for everyone when i say

NAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 11:12PM byrd said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just saw the trailer during tonight's episode of South Park. It was rated R. I think this rumor is either BS, or a minor publicity stunt, or both.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 11:24PM EMaster said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Relax guys. I was expecting this. Hollywood likes to take shit that is hyper successful in Video games/retro cartoons/shows and fuck it up on the silver screen. I want to meet the fuckers who make these decisions and make them watch through each episode or play through an entire fucking game of Hitman to realize he is not PG 13. You know what this encourages? 12 year olds wanting to play an M-rated Hitman game cause they thought the game was cool. Hollywood is bullshit and that is why I pirate their movies and choose not only to pay maybe for 1/25 movies but outright refuse to pay for their shitty DVDs with minimal and useless content. Fuck fox, Fuck Hollywood and fuck the guy who made this decision.
Reply

Posted: Oct 10th 2007 11:38PM mirage said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What is really sad is that most PG 13 movies would receive an M rating based on the ESRB rating system. Yet it is okay to peddle these movies to our kids while games that were made for adults are "controversial". What a fucked up society we live in!
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2007 2:14AM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So THAT'S why they casted Timothy Olyphant! ;P


On a more serious note, the industry is being too hypocritical here... they make a movie for "teens" based on a violent M-rated game. What's that going to do if the movie is successful? Make those "teens" buy M-rated games.

I don't care if youngsters play M-rated games, because I believe that the ESRB is total crap, but it's just that we're going to hear some shit more from some Jackos.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2007 5:14AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In pretty much every circumstance directors are contractually obligated when hired to deliver a film that meets a specific MPAA rating. If they decided midway through production to turn an R movie into a PG-13 movie then this would suck and be unfair to the director. But I doubt it; it's more likely he signed on to direct a PG-13 movie. It's also likely they let him film additional violent scenes for the standard "unrated DVD" that will come out. If for some reason he refused to deliver a PG-13 cut for theatrical release, he's a jerk. I mean if it was his money, fine, but the studio trusted him with tens of millions of dollars, it seems they should be able to get what they paid for.
That said, everythng about this movie seems to stink from the get go. Timothy Olyphant is a great actor; he was plenty scary in Go, and was equally intense in Deadwood. But the shots of his bald head in the clips from this movie just look goofy.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2007 7:37AM 2kings said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Video Game movies sucks

always have probably always will
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2007 8:02AM BrucieB said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
WACK!!!!!!
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2007 9:48AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm still going to see it. PG-13 still display violence (not as much as R-rated) just not as much cursing IIRC. I would love for it to have as much mayhem as Die Hard 4.0
Reply

Posted: Jul 29th 2008 12:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why are we watering down the movie version of a game that is rated M, meaning 17+, so that children 13+ can see it? I thought we all called JT looney for saying M rated games were being marketed to kids?

This is a stupid and irresponsible move.
Reply

Posted: Oct 11th 2007 12:07PM refinedsugar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was really looking forward to this film. Typical. Should have seen this coming with how movies are made to market to mass audiences these days. In any case, the worst news I've read in a long while.
Reply
| 1 | 2 |
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW