| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (23)

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 4:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It would be sweet if the descriptions were more detailed.

Like for "Nudity", it may just show an ass cheek.
So they just write "butt"

And if you see a boob they write
"nipple."
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 10:19PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Your hand is naked on that picture.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 4:44PM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would buy a game with the "Ridiculous Cleavage" content descriptor.

We'll, I'd pirate it.
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2007 12:41AM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm so busy this week because of Sweetest Day. (Ohio and military holiday started by sweets and card companies) It's just hard getting away from cutting and wrapping, and selling thousands of flowers and roses. And just because you have an eye patch to give you night vision I'll just slip into 3D to beat your old school ass if you ever think of pirating.

In relation to the article: I'm really enjoying RE4 Wii with my younger brother. My sister and mother who usually hate horror watches us play. (I'm a much better shot but I'm letting him do the grunt work.) Ratings are weird but I wouldn't let little kids watch as zombies explode. Especially all those spider and tentacle bosses.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 4:48PM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Any game with the description of "Ridiculous Cleavage" would be an instant multi-million seller all across the world.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 10:20PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But that's not supposed to be of ESRB's concern.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 11:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
and the fdf crumbles ...
Reply

Posted: Oct 17th 2007 1:13AM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I had to dedicate an avatar to my lost friend, the Weighted Companion Cube.

Hypno-Toad will return, though.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 4:48PM hotpuck6 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i think the people that an article like this pertains to is not being hit if they put it on a site like gamasutra.

The need to have this shit on news websites as a consumer alert, because i'm sure everyone who reads game sites are more than aware of the ESRB and what the ratings mean.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 4:52PM Zarim said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've noticed a real change in the ESRB's attitude in the past few years. Ever since the whole ridiculous hot coffee thing they seem to be occasionally rate a game AO just to appease the knee-jerkers who don't understand video games. Solider of Fortune 1 and 2 are pre hot coffee, and those games are ultra violent yet rated M.

Since rating a game AO effectively bans it, I guess the ESRB is doing a good job of telling me that even though I'm an adult, I obviously can't make purchasing decisions for myself.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 5:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
noone ever gives a fuck about the small descriptors, they barely even care about the letter rating



and i agree zarim, it's fucking retarded that I, as a 24 year old, can't buy a AO game for 360 or ps2 or whatnot
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 5:12PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, they are far from ideal

But they're drawing the reactionaries' fire, which would otherwise be directed as pressure for state/federal legislation (despite continuous proof of judicial disapproval)
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 5:31PM Zarim said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No matter what the ESRB does there will always be politicians to make anti-game legislation to make it seem like they're doing something 'moral' in the eyes of ignorant or irresponsible parents. The 'wow' factor is all they're going for; they know the supreme court will strike it down as soon as it's passed. It just bothers me that the ESRB is being bullied into censorship. Since these politicians are just looking for a scapegoat anyway, I wish the ESRB would just tell them to take the 1st amendment and shove it up their ass.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 5:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I saw a movie like this once... hang on... o yah, 'This Film is Not Yet Rated.' Do watch; I'm amused to say that when I rented it, Jack Valenti died 48 hours later. I am, apparently, Sadako.

Perhaps someday we will need a movie like that for the ESRB. While they've not gotten as heavy handed ridiculous as the MPAA yet, can their time be far away?
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 6:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, unlike the MPAA, at least they are being open about their system. The MPAA, is shrouded in secrecy (which I'm sure you know since you saw that great documentary) and no one knows what their guidelines are for ratings. Obviously violent movies get away with more, whereas violent games are more strictly enforced with higher ratings.

So I don't see the ESRB turning into the MPAA - not unless someone from the right wing conservative sector comes in like Valenti and lays out a completely revamped system. And that is highly doubtful.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 7:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How do you douche bags always cry right wing conservative when it's always democrats ie tipper gore, hillary clinton, and joe leiberman pushing these things? Do you even follow politics or do you just parrot whatever someone you think is smarter than you says?
Reply

Posted: Oct 17th 2007 8:38AM Korova Pamplona said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The democrats do it only to rope in some republican votes. Republicans make this an issue. Although Tipper Gore is another matter. She is just an asshole.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 6:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Using the picture alone I can deduce a random sticker goes front and a “Rated E” sticker goes back, huh no wonder why so many kids get to play GTA.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 7:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope the descriptor for No More Heroes says "Mock Jerkin' it"
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 9:20PM hatramroany said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know what's weird? That I just realized and you probably all think I'm done. Anyone can walk into a bookstore and buy any book. I just got a book before I turned 17 and it was filled with all this profanity and violence and no one said anything.
Reply

Posted: Oct 17th 2007 8:53AM Korova Pamplona said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Revolutions have already happened because of book censorship. Bad bad idea. Until games are viewed as more than just entertainment, they will not be as free as books. But your thought there suggests that the process is beginning. In the past games were toys, not books & movies. We are moving in the direction of freedom.
Reply

Posted: Oct 17th 2007 10:39AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Synner, when you calm down and take your medication, get back to me and tell me what any of that had to do with my comment, okay?

The only connection I can see - the other guy's mention about Jack Valenti - is valid when it comes, well, to Jack Valenti's MPAA. It WAS created and vetted conservatively. No one has yet supported Clinton and Liebermen's weird Thompsonesque rampages.
Reply

Posted: Oct 17th 2007 12:51AM Asgeras said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You forgot to add "...again" to the title of this piece. As others pointed out, the ESRB has, repeatedly, tried to educate the community at large about gaming.

If the public needs anything extra, they should end up hiring an additional employee at various game stores to randomly shout out the ratings to customers...maybe with the addition of a strobe light that comes down whenever a kid checks out a game that's inappropriate for his age.

Those are freebies, if the ESRB is reading this. :P
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW