| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (40)

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 10:09AM drater said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
those are some nasty-ass looking fingernails.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 10:14AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
LOL
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 10:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Classical guitar player?
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 10:07AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So out of say 100 cards played, how many times did you have a game-breaking moment when the camera just wouldn't behave?

This is make-or-break for me.

Cheers
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 3:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Using a camera for this purpose is certainly an odd choice; while Nintendo's eReader, for instance, certainly wasn't a huge hit (certainly not outside of Japan), something more akin technologically to the eReader would seem more appropriate to a card game. It wouldn't require any special lighting conditions, etc, and would be far more difficult to fake - while at least one guy online has apparently managed to print scannable eReader cards successfully, it requires just the right printer and a hell of a lot of patience; only a slight improvement to the tech would make it even more difficult to thwart. But a camera? I'd like to see it in action, for it certainly sounds incredibly awkward.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 5:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Then again, the visual illusion of the creatures rising out of the cards might make it all worthwhile.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 10:16AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Trust in the Heart of the Cards! It's time to DUEL!
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 1:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My hair wants the eye of judgement but I'm a xb360 fanboy oh Screw the rules I have money!,In America!

So get your game on!
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 1:53PM JoshMilewski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My voice gives me strength to buy the super special awesome Eye of Judgment!

I'm going to destroy the world! (Hahahaha...)

Brains.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 10:45AM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Too gimmicky to become a true hit, end of story.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 11:03AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I thought the SAME thing about the Wii...
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 11:24AM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah I knew this would come up. The Wii has proven(regardless of whether you like it or not) that it isn't a gimmick with games like Mp3, Re4, Super Mario Galaxy etc etc. Eye of Judgement is a gimmick because it's basically a regular CCG game and the gimmick is that now you can view your cards in awesome 3D(which I'll admit it does look really nice). Other than that, there's really not much too this game. What would have made this game much more interesting would be if Sony put some type of rpg story mode where you could level up your cards (or something like that). Yeah I know this sounds harsh (and I probably will get flamed for it) but I just don't see people who aren't veterans to CCG sticking with this game for more than a few months.

In before: BLARRRGH I HATE TEH WII!!! IT'S A GIMMICK!!
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 11:39AM DBX00 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The game is far from a gimmick because it takes a card game that has a cult following and allows you to play with players around the world (in a game that usually required to be face to face). It's a proven platform, innovative method to bring it to the console world, and offers multiplayer that isn't possible on the original card games. In other words, if I was a card player this would be something that would interest me. As long as they support it in the future it'll do fine especially since the development of the title probably wasn't that outrageous.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 11:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@Vegeta: Wow, new IPs that we never expected to see on the Wii! Nice games you have there.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 12:09PM borland502 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@vegeta: "The Wii has proven"

Yes, well that's a nice sentiment to declare almost a year after its release. But even moderates were wondering about the gimmick nature of the Wiimote. So comparing the EOJ perception against that of the Wii does not have to be hasty or fanboyish.

I think you doth protest too much. A gimmick is a one shot deal that fades with time. You don't use a DDR pad to play Halo after all. The eye toy is already doing more with itself than other webcam console peripherals. You just seem overly defensive and whiny when you attempt to cut off all comparisons with that of the wiimote before release.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 12:10PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@DBXOO

But online CCG has already been done (Magic the Gathering has some type of online service where you can play other gamers online) so I really wouldn't call what Eye of Judgment is doing innovative.

@behemothzero
ummm ok? I have no idea how that comment has anything to do with the game being a gimmick.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 2:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The game Vegeta you mean involved no eyetoy - the thing that makes it innovative. So bringing that in as a reason for its lack of innovation is invalid.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 5:11PM bm111 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm sorry, Sony fanbois, but something that can be omitted from a card game ENTIRELY (yes, you can play the game with just the cards) is the very fucking DEFINITION of a gimmick.

This is like if the Wii controller was a regular controller with no motion sensitivity, and games just asked you to flail your arms while pressing a button, just -because-. That would be just about the same kind of thing that this is.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 10:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The game itself isn't gimmicky but the portion of playing a card battle game with augmented reality "tacked on" may seem to be. It's not to say that augmented reality is a bust or that the game is generally bad or pointless, but in a way it's like playing an electronic (not videogame version) of a board game where it merely adds lights to a board and a few sound effects coming out of a speaker (this game though is better than just that though). Personally I think it would be more interesting to play such a game with at least some kind of augmented reality goggles the bring the concept home. Looking at the TV while playing a board game does seem slightly awkward, especially if it's just there to supplement the experience with "better graphics" in an "on the side" kind of way.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 11:11AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The "(PS3)" mention in the title is hilarious. With the popularity of card games in other regions besides Japan and the PS3 market regions in other regions besides Japan, I can see why a person may confuse this as a multi-platform title. Keep your eyes on this console pusher people I tell ya! Tit's a recipe for success.

I'm so e'fing jaded :(
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 11:00AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
woah hold up

Are you saying a PS3 title does not live up to its hype?

Also I think if you were playing online you could get the other player to concede by whipping out a black lotus.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 11:04AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Arent reviews supposed to have scores? Did it get a 0?
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 12:14PM Chibi Chaingun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lol...
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 11:24AM CommentSystem said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ive been reading reviews for this game, and their cameras fared better than yours.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 11:27AM SheppyReturns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was sold on this game day one. I'm constantly scanning Ebay for cases of cards ($80 for a case of cards is my limit). I want this sooooooo bad.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 11:55AM JoshMilewski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I'm with you there.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 11:33AM SheppyReturns said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Wow, leveling up the cards? Long term story modes?

My friend, World of Warcraft is that way. Enjoy your 90+ months of grinding.

Leveling in the cards itself is a very dangerous proposal which defies the very basic nature of CCGs. That is, my Cthulian Dark Princess will be the same power as your Cthulian Dark Princess. If this very basic rule is broken, it will start giving the grinders a distinct advantage in gameplay and completely break the game. Like Triple Triad, this game is about balancing a deck, using strategy, and luck of the draw.

I'd agree about the RPG mode but seriously, point out one game in this genre whee it was made better by such tactics. Hell, point out one game with the basic instant play multiplayer that was made better! Besides, what happened to just having a game be a game?
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 4:09PM Shagittarius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think this game will involve luck of the draw. It would be too easy to cheat.
Reply

Posted: Oct 19th 2007 8:39AM Ghengis said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
RTFA, my friend. You cannot cheat; when you play online against somebody, you scan your deck a few cards at a time, then the computer TELLS you what card you "drew", you find it, and you play it. No cheating.

I hear that a well-lit table works wonders to stop mis-identified cards. The guys at Penny Arcade got to play with the setup, and they wrote up a lot of this stuff. It was within the last week, I think, if you want to check it out.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 12:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm just happy the game itself is getting good reviews. It makes the purchase sound more worth it. But I'm just pissed that the creatures don't respond to touch anymore. I thought that would be a hilarious trick to show friends and stuff. Now they're just boring digital creatures. Awesome boring digital creatures.

*****

Michael C. Sherrin
http://www.prodigeek.com/
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 12:01PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I still cant see the draw to it. Of course, I don't understand people sitting there frothing over Magic the Gathering cards either. Creeps me out.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 12:18PM borland502 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You have a 360 right? Achievements cater to the same Pokemon "gotta catch 'em all" obsessive behavior. And RPGs always have the few willing to go to level 9999 and get the sword of a thousand truths.

CCG groups are just more visible, since they often have to migrate from basement to basement to play games. Most other gaming reclusive people never have to leave their gaming toilet.

It is a brave new world of distant interaction we live in.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 12:16PM Chibi Chaingun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The gimmick is cool and I would love to see it in action.. but doesn't put me over the edge to want a PS3 yet. I don't care for table top games.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 12:20PM SuperGayParade said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
maybe the PSEYE would work better if you weren't playing in your mother's basement
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 1:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It would have been nice if you could have described your set-up. It's the first review I'm seeing were the players had problem with the camera... Was it under fluorescent light? Neon? Daylight from a side window? Office or house? In the dark (people love playing in the dark, but I'm not sure it would work for a card game :)

I'm also sad to hear you cannot poke those little monsters anymore... At least you can hold them in your hand.

Still buying it day one even if I have to add a few 1000 watts fixtures : )

Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 4:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To any other tabletop nerds out there- did the blue steampunk engines look way too much like the warjacks from warmachine? Similarly- the red cerebus riding demon looks straight out of WH or WH40k.
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 6:50PM sambeckett said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What stops people from making copies/printouts of all the cards on the computer to play with this game?
Reply

Posted: Oct 16th 2007 8:41PM 01 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I saw this while wandering around a PAX and it ccertainly looked nice, but I can see how it could have some problems.
Reply

Posted: Oct 18th 2007 12:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is the game a gimmick? No it's not. Is the use of the eye toy a gimmick? By definition yes. Gimmick = an ingenious or novel device, scheme, or stratagem, esp. one designed to attract attention or increase appeal. It increases the appeal of a normal CCG. However I'm still getting the game. It is the only review that complained about the camera. But to those of us who are into video games & board games this works. It's worth a try if your sick of the same old games over and over again. It's nice to see they are thinking outside the box. Games like Little Big Planet and Eye of Judgment are just the beginning of what Sony has been aiming at.
Reply

Posted: Oct 29th 2007 2:00AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Isn't there a light on the Eye? It would only make sense...oh, wait, that excludes Sony. Nothing Sony does makes sense except to the most hardcore Playstation fan.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW