| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (9)

Posted: Oct 18th 2007 6:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thanks for the review. I'm still torn. I love Warner Bros cartoons, and Duck Amuck really is a classic, but anybody of my generation who is familiar with this cartoon will probably be too old for such shallow gameplay. I don't know, I don't know...

Posted: Oct 18th 2007 7:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you can GameFly it or something, you should absolutely play it. I think everyone needs to at least play it for a couple of hours.

Posted: Oct 18th 2007 7:44PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Being 18, i am old enough to remember when the Turner Networks had nothing better to show than old Warner Bros Cartoons

There are a lot of idiots out there in the network TV business, nowhere is any of this stuff, except once in a blue moon on Turner Classic Movies and on Boomerang which is a Pay channel no matter what cable package you have

feh

Posted: Oct 18th 2007 10:28PM andsoitgoes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wanted to love this game as much as you did, but I found "shallow" to not even come close to describing how lacking the gameplay is. I find the mini-games, ESPECIALLY the one where you cut Daffy in half, to not have really been tested.

It's nice that they really try to cater to the people who actually saw the original cartoon. But to pay that price for a game that offers nothing other than annoying mini-games to get new cut screens, no thank you.

The sound is horrific and the cuts in-between scenes remind me of how annoyed I was with Raving Rabbids on the Wii. It's unpolished, jerky and there's no smooth transition. It's like when you're watching an older lower quality toon, and you can see objects and say without question "Oh, that tree is going to be moved".

I loved the original cartoon, I can't count the number of times I saw it in my childhood years and repeated over and over. There are some things that are really funny, but as funny as they may be and as GOOD of a job they did in the animation - it's not worth the price of admission. IGN gave it a 6 and I thought they were crazy, then I played it. I "Finished" it in less than an hour. I know there are a ton more mini-games, and probably a slew more endings, but ugh.

I like some parts of it, but after going through it one time and suffering the mini games... eh. I don't know if I'll do it again.

Guess each person has a different opinion!

Posted: Oct 18th 2007 11:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've played this game start to finish at least once a day since I picked it up last Saturday, and I'm still not sick of it because I'm a pervert.

Personally, I think this game turned out to be everything it should be. It has the replay value of a good cartoon with the added bonus of variability -- you have the ability to direct the outcome, but you can also just sit back and let Daffy dig his own grave by triggering seemingly random events. His personality sparkles -- I must have seen every cutscene that the game offers several times over, but the game still hasn't broken the illusion that Daffy Duck is in my DS and interacting with me in real time.

I put the minigames in the same league as the ones in Feel the Magic and Cooking Mama -- exactly good enough to support the premise, and no better. I don't think the point of them is -- or even should be -- to provide an intense video game experience. The best ones are simply about acting out the things that happen in cartoons. The cooking game, for example, instantly reminded me of those cartoon scenes where the hero is sitting in a pot while a villainous predator (like the Tasmanian Devil) gleefully chops vegetables into it. It's not difficult, and it doesn't have to be; it just gives you a chance to act out a classic cartoon moment. Nothing more, nothing less.

It's a one-of-a-kind sort of game. For me, that was all the reason I needed to buy it. I can understand why most folks would disagree with me, but I still say that everyone should get a chance to try this game out.

Posted: Oct 19th 2007 12:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So Nick nudges me one way, then BAM, along comes CPFace to put some CP (Critical Praise) in my Face.

You guys suck. Make up your minds! :P

It sounds like IGN hit the mark when they said "Ultimately Duck Amuck succeeds more as an interactive cartoon than it does as a mini-game collection." But they gave it only a 6 out of 10. Maybe I'll pick it up when it gets discounted, and even then I'll have to remember that I'm buying an "interactive cartoon."

Posted: Oct 19th 2007 12:56AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I tried this game, but I think I'd be too generous if I even gave it a 5 or 6 out of 10. I thought it was a great concept, and got a laugh when I closed the DS, but other than that, it just falls flat in every aspect other than the presentation.

And presentation just doesn't make a good game for me, I'm afraid.

Posted: Oct 19th 2007 10:11AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't want to convince you into a purchase that you'll regret, so I'll say that I basically agree with everyone else's comments -- it's a shallow gameplay experience, and you're probably better off renting or borrowing. It takes a very particular sort of person to take satisfaction in getting a game like this for $30, and, well, I just happen to be one of those people. I also got a kick out of Pokemon Channel, if that tells you anything. ;)

Featured Stories

Image

Now Playing: May 21-27, 2012

Posted on May 21st 2012 2:50PM

Image

Diablo 3 review: Hitting the jackpot

Posted on May 21st 2012 12:50PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW