| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (33)

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 11:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
fuck that guy

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 11:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fuck him... I hope all gamers throw their DS Lites and PSP's to him.

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 11:54AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I'll keep my DS Lite, thank you
Reply

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 11:40AM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, JT is improving - now he's only 99% bullshit.

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 11:44AM copa said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Stop inviting him to this crap.

I have zero sympathy for you guys next time JT gets some anti-gaming legislation passed.

The gaming media and the gaming conferences do far more than the mainstream media to elevate this guy to a position of respect and authority.

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 11:50AM SheppyReturns said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Actually, no. The mainstream media calls him in as an expert, puts him into easy win scenarios, and allows the worst elements of gaming media to debate him (ie Adam Sessler). Anytime he's debated in the past, it's been easy wins.

In phillie, Lorne Lanning was up and he was among the first reasonable people to debate the issues. N'Gai moderated. In other words, this was one of the first times Jack Thompson stepped out of his protective circle and debated in a manner absolutely and stunningly out of the usual character he puts himself out to be. Evidence? Hell, just become a Gamepolitics regular as Jackie Boy is always jumping on and normally calling all of us idiots while going off on a tangent so confusing, he loses geometry teachers.
Reply

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 4:14PM ultimateq said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought adam sessler did an excellent job of ripping him a new pooper.
Reply

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 11:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In all honesty, everyone there should be nice to him. That way, when he's up there accusing everyone of being murderers in training, he'll sound even more ridiculous than he normally does.

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 11:48AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Here's an idea, don't give him the attention that he wants. It would be funny if there wasn't one person in the arena to listen to his crap.

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 11:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
i know. I remember about 6 months ago, the AP decided to not make any stories about paris hilton, and that week was awesome. then they announced the next monday what they did, and it made me wish they would just do it all the time. :(
Reply

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 11:50AM ShinAntonio said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For God's sake, quit giving this fuckstick a forum to talk! I wish Manhunt 2 would've never been conceived if it meant even one less person would've given him the time of day.

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 11:56AM sand0789 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It irritates me that the only "evidence" that violent gaming causes violence is the study done that showed kids had a tendency towards aggressive, though not physically violent, behavior after long stretches of violent COMPETITIVE gaming. I capitolize competitive because similar studies done on kids competing against one another in a sport have similar results. Is it the violence of the game or the competitive nature and the hard feelings the 4 people who lost harbor?

Along with that, there have been over half a dozen studies I've heard about that failed to create a link to violent gaming, even though they were designed more or less to find a link. Then there is the whole statistics and criminal profiling thing which shows no relation as well.

Yet in these debates JT and other gold digging lawyers and socially conservative attention whores talk about the studies as if a link is proven and people actually are dying because of gaming, even though the current evidence strongly indicates otherwise. They are actually able to sound like they have science and statistics on their side when they overwhelmingly do not. Every judge taking a JT case has overwhelmingly punished and thrown out his motions because statistics and science show overwhelmingly that he is totally out of line. I mean, read some of these judges responses. They are practically calling him an ignorant buffoon with no grip on reality that abuses, misuses, and misinterprets facts to a level that they won't even waste any more public time on.

You can't win a $600M lawsuit defending video games and the 30 and up largely nongaming demographic that actually watches the news is not interested in hearing "well, we've analyzed the statistics and done some studies that show violent video games have no significant link to violent criminals", even though that is exactly what the evidence shows. That is why we have to deal with this crap.

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 12:04PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"You can't win a $600M lawsuit defending video games and the 30 and up largely nongaming demographic that actually watches the news is not interested in hearing "well, we've analyzed the statistics and done some studies that show violent video games have no significant link to violent criminals", even though that is exactly what the evidence shows."

Please explain this, I don't understand it at all. Someone won a $600 million counterclaim against him? Someone defended against his suit and then what? I just can't understand the paragraph and want you to clear it up.

The judges have been pretty clear in their language, and though they have not punished him (that I have seen - punishment being sanctions), they have expressed that his arguments were weak and unpersuasive.
Reply

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 1:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
One time I saw a kid get so mad at Bible Adventures he threw his NES controller at the TV.

Bad games make kids go crazy.

Good games don't.
Reply

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 11:58AM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hopefully he will keep up his attack on that Evil Sims 2 game. I mean really, when you think debased games - you think Sims!

http://www.jackthompson.org/video_game_cases/the_sims_2.htm

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 12:10PM cesaria said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
wow, i just read that and jack couldn't be more wrong (per usual.) We might as well outlaw pencils and paper, cause kids might draw naked people!
Reply

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 11:59AM ThornedVenom said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Didn't know they were organizing a witch-burning ceremony.

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 12:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
that's the only news story i'd like to hear jack being in :)
Reply

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 12:21PM Altairio said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Honestly, why? I'm all for talking it out, having an open & honest debate and finding common ground, but who wants to hear any more of his bullshit? If we were to judge him based on his laurels then he would be practically irrelevant. Instead we make him the infamous naysayer, adding to his celebrity and his fat wallet. Blackball him.

And inviting him to the GDC is like inviting an abortion clinic bomber to watch the procedure.

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 1:17PM mietha said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Letting this idiot speak about video games is akin to letting oil execs voice their views on global warming. Seriously, why does anyone give him face time?

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 1:27PM Batzarro The worlds WOrst Detect said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you already have the Internet and PC Sims nudity requires,and you still somewhat do it, you might be taking the LONG WAY into porn...

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 1:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We live in a culture where fear is used as a control. For the right-wing we have "the terrorists", for the left-wing we have "global warming", for incompetent parents we have "videogame violence". Everybody is so afraid of things that are either not real(global warming is a human factor, videogames cause violence) or majorly exaggerated (al quaida is coming for you!), that we can't focus on any real issues. But don't worry, as soon as we get rid of terrorism, global warming, and videogame violence everything will be just rainbow skies and lollipop trees. The cake is a LIE! Have we learned NOTHING!?

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 5:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ok ok, so let me get this straight:

1) Terrorists are an exaggerated threat to keep the populace afraid and obedient so the government can go crazy and stay in power.

2) Game-related violence is total bull, but the media keeps lying about it to keep people afraid of new technologies, new art forms, and crazy kids and school shootings. And to let Jack Thompson keep his job.

3) Global warming is not affected by humans whatsoever, but left-wingers lie about it to trick people into taking better care of the planet? How does that work?

I agree with points 1 and 2, if those were what you were getting at. I don't see who makes money or stays in power due to lying about global warming.
Reply

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 7:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Do some research on environmental groups. Do you know that they spend about 60% of their time on fund-raising? Some of the biggest lobbyists in the world work for environmental groups. It's a business. They're not raging against the machine anymore, they're part of it. Do you know how many glaciers are shrinking? Do you know that they're vastly outnumbered by the ones that are growing? Did you know that compared to 200 years ago world temperatures today are generally either the same or colder? Why do you think Global Warming conventions are always held in the hottest part of summer? Is there more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere? Sure. But go back and do some basic 6th grade science and try to remember what plants thrive on. If you guessed carbon dioxide then you're right. The fact is that there is NO scientific evidence linking increased carbon dioxide levels to global warming, quite the opposite in fact. Who benefits? I believe that Al Gore won the Nobel fucking Peace Prize for making a documentary that promotes absolutely no peace. It's just another control. That's all.
Reply

Posted: Nov 6th 2007 4:54AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I did some 6th grade science, and wow, you're right. Plants thrive on carbon dioxide. But that's not relevant at all to the fact that carbon dioxide HEATS the planet. That's 7th grade science. That must be the difference between our arguments here.

Can I get some sauce for your points about growing glaciers, the temperatures decreasing over 200 years, and everything else?

Don't tell me to do research, as if what you're saying is so obvious. It's a logical fallacy that Jack Thompson is frequently guilty of. Just give me numbers and sauce man.
Reply

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 1:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And gamers everywhere will continue to call him a jackass.

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 2:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He's a publicity machine that Jack Thompson. Everything he sets his eyes on seems to turn 100 times cooler than initially intended.

Best thing to ever happen to video games.

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 7:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thompson..you already lost, I bought manhunt 2 and I love it. No...No Thompson, shut up.

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 2:27PM HeyApples said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No point in "debating" with someone who is a close-minded twat.

Posted: Nov 6th 2007 9:03AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Al Gore of videogames in my opinion.

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 3:18PM PlatinumSkeet said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All he has left is debates. He's about to be debarred so he's trying to get money from the industry he's trying to destroy.

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 4:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lol he was pwnt.

Posted: Nov 5th 2007 10:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Love how this is filed under "Hacks."

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW