| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (94)

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I like how out of all the external links link to different sites.

And of course I like how the word "significant" links to NEOGAF. =P
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:34PM KyleOrl said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Significant" linking to NeoGAF was not intentional... the ordering is random. That said, I could have linked to a dozen more, if I wanted to. This is getting big.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Kyle, cmon dude, you need to show the video review, that's where the good stuff is...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBD0cUeeEQc
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:27PM Rubix42 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Maybe this really is none of our damn business. Last time I checked, Gamespot sucked anyways. We all know the best reviews come from friends who have played the game that have the same tastes as we do.

And come on, no one is unbiased. Reviewers post only their opinion of a game that they rushed through to play the next, so why does their opinion even count for anything.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually Gamespot reviews in past years were the most accurate, sometimes they underrated some titles here and there but I prefer underrated games to overrated games (Assassin’s creed).

Now with the fall of Gamespot I have to A) Go to blockbuster every time I want a game to rent it and decide if it is worth buying, that means spending in rents, gasoline and well popcorn and gummy bears (Hell is blockbuster after all) or B) Ask other gamers and well that normally isn’t a good idea.

Other options include the search of another site and that is going to be hard since 1up sucks, IGN just no, Gamespy is a mixed bag and Gamepro well lol.

Now please don't vote me donw into oblivion.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:43PM louiedog said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think what you said applies to Gerstmann. Whether I agreed with his reviews or not they always seemed honest and he generally knew what he was talking about. His reviews usually came out a day or two later than reviews on other sites, because I really got the feeling he explored games the way they were meant to be.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:43PM louiedog said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think what you said applies to Gerstmann. Whether I agreed with his reviews or not they always seemed honest and he generally knew what he was talking about. His reviews usually came out a day or two later than reviews on other sites, because I really got the feeling he explored games the way they were meant to be.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 3:35PM Rubix42 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
That's the beauty of it. We each have our own opinion. The only reviews I ever read are from Play Magazine, because they have people on staff that only review games in their favorite genre. So they find the redeeming quality of a platformer that a shooter fan would tear apart.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Gamespot:Epic Fail.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"we stand behind the editorial content that our teams produce on a daily basis."

...Unless someone pays us to say nice things about them, and one of our reviewers says their game is crap, in which case, we fire them.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 11:40PM Mike DPad said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How the fuck can someone get fired for telling the truth!?

To back it up, the Metacritic scores don't lie! Why Gamespot? Why!?
Reply

Posted: Dec 1st 2007 12:06AM Anticrawl said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Shovelface.. I mean Jeff Gerstmann was probably already on track to being fired regardless of recent rumors. The man is mad and perhaps gamespot may gain some credibility again in my book.

A happy time for gaming indeed, one less rabid radicalist to sully the name of videogames.
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2007 1:42PM Mike DPad said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Anticrawl, you truly belong to corporate America.

Maybe you might not have agreed with all of his reviews but at least the guy knows what he's talking about. I hate it more when they have clueless gamers that NEVER play games and give a shit game a bloated score.

This guy is a bit on the looney side but fuck... at least he gives his honest opinion.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
wow, now we know that we know nothing and we won't get any information, neither from gamespot nor from eidos, great :P
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
gamespot blows chunks...it was funny when that duude got teabagged in thier halo 3 beta streame
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:53PM Crono141 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
True knowledge is knowing that we know nothing.

-Socrates

I leaned that from Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Yes Gamespot sucks, honestly I only trust IGN's reviews, but still, this is bullshit.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:40PM tentaclesex said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At least Gamespot articles are proofread. IGN publishes some of the sloppiest articles in the business. They regularly contain an astonishing quantity of grammatical errors.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But only grammar Nazis care about that anyway :P .

Oh and sorry for the "donw" I mean "down”, I need to change this keyboard ASAP.

Now the problem with IGN is that they aren't as reliable as GS was. They might have some good reviews here and there but normally those are reserved for unknown games or games which don't have any hype.
A quick example would be their PSP reviews, those are good because no one really gives a damn about the PSP but if you see their XB360 reviews is a different story.

Also their movie reviews suck, big time.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:34PM The Punisher said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I really liked Jeff, and I value Gamespots ratings probably the most. I find Gamespots reviews some of the most accurate and unbiased.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:36PM Xelloss said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I canceled my Gamespot Total Access Subscription. I lost a lot of faith in CNET. Not sure what will happen, but still waiting to see.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 3:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
And I was banned on porpouse by posting Goatse and flamming about the Ps3 and the Wii in the system wars forums because I also lost credibility on Gamespot..and I was so pissed I did all that months before this.

Viva la Gerstmann!
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:37PM tentaclesex said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I've always thought Gerstmann was a good reviewer. It's really lame if he really got canned because he wasn't afraid to come out and say that McGriddles taste like shit.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:40PM Chrysee said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I agree. If that's actually the case then they really have a conflict of interests and I don't think their reviews can count for much anymore, not that they did.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:37PM Huey2k2 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Well it's official. I have now cancelled my Gamespot subscription and will never be going back there.

This is utter BS.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:39PM Eugimon said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Pretty sad, I used to trust cnet and would always go to them before making any major electronics purchases. Not anymore. Suddenly, all their reviews are suspect.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
""For over a decade, Gamespot and the many members of its editorial team have produced thousands of unbiased reviews.."

At this point I gave up reading their crap.

Everyone knows that site, along with quite a few others, are reviewing games based on advertising budgets.

I come on Ratchet and Clank Future Tools Of Destruction, a 7.5.... PLEASE.. I think even the most biased fanboy can tell it's a 9.something...
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:50PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
hmmm. Funny since Psychonauts and Zack and Wiki both scored much higher than R&C, and I'm pretty sure the publishers for both games weren't paying GS top dollars for ad space.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 4:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
i'm guessing that with some big titles, you expect lots of advertisement, but if they (being r&c in this case) doesn't cough up the dough, you might lower their score a bit

I dunno if that happened for the new r&c, but i've heard of it happening in the past for some things
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 11:12PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@gonk

But the question is, do the reviewers even give a shit about ad space? I mean how much of that money Edios gave Gamespot do you think trickled down to the actual staff of gamespot. Probably not alot. In fact I honestly doubt Jeff got a bigger check because of it.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I don't have a GameSpot account, but if I did I would cancel it.
:)
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:48PM FrankTheCrank said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I love when journalist and editors get all full of themselves and become holier than thou and start talking about their integrity...please!

Half these journalist would give any company a free pass for nothing more than a free console and some games. Just imagine what you get for a free press junket to Redmond or L.A.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:54PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Wow what are you talking about?

You do realize that most of these sites only have a couple of consoles that they use only for reviewing, and that if they want to play on their own time they have to buy their own consoles and games.

Also yeah they get swag from game companies, but I highly doubt a Master Chief plush toy is going to influence anyone's review.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:55PM Dr Stabbingworth said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
What, being a dumbass about the console wars wasn't enough for you?
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 3:24PM FrankTheCrank said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
My point is that, some journalist can be easily bought. I don't know anyone at Gamespot, IGN or any other news site or blog, so I'm not attacking any individual or site.

But your telling me every single reviewer and writer is above it all?

I think what CNET did was pretty lame, but in the print media, these guys are always skating on the edge, they ALL have a sales department that has to sell ad space and they have people who have to review those companies products...you think they ever talk? do you think a writer or reviewer isn't aware of this? Of course they are.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 3:32PM FrankTheCrank said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dan....your profile says it all. XBOX360Fanboy.

Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:49PM Lamppost said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"GameSpot takes its editorial integrity extremely seriously. ... For over a decade, Gamespot and the many members of its editorial team have produced thousands of unbiased reviews that have been a valuable resource for the gaming community. At CNET Networks, we stand behind the editorial content that our teams produce on a daily basis."

Translation: C'mon, trust us. You trust us, right? Right?
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Don't let them off the hook. Keep hammering them with questions until you get an answer.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
*Takes Gamespot.com off of bookmarks list*
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 3:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I've removed the RSS feeds that I had and will not be going to their website on purpose until I see some serious action on their part. Anyone know how to cancel one of their basic membership accounts?
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:52PM ScottG13 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I sure wish I had a Gamespot subscription to cancel...
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What the fuck kind of statement is that? Thats a completely vacant statement. It does nothing. It says nothing. It means nothing. What the fuck is the point?

Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:56PM jpcx01 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I also cancelled my GameSpot total subscription access pass.

Also added to my hosts file /etc/hosts
gamespot.com 127.0.0.1
www.gamespot.com 127.0.0.1

This isnt because Jeff is gone or because Jeff was fired about Kane and Lynch. It's because he was fired period. I was sad to see Greg and Rich go, but they left on their own accord. It's crazy and inexcusable for Gamespot to fire their best personality, who brought with him a huge fanbase. The best I can hope for now is the rest of the top crew (Ryan, Tor, Alex, and Brad) jumps ship as well.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:57PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
agreed. I also love Tor and Brad. Hopefully they'll realize that this is a bunch of bullshit and jump ship.

Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 4:39PM zsavior said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Exactly Dave, I don't care about this guy, I care about the integrity of gaming journalism. For them to out and out fire a guy over a bad review well that is just brazen and can't be ignored. Even though I don't think the game community should be ignoring any of it but there is a point where a line must be drawn in the dirt.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 10:18PM jpcx01 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually, I wasnt quite clear. I don't think he was fired over a review. Eventually that will come out. Of course employees there are going to be talking.

Eventually it'll be clarified that he was fired for something specific like coming in late constantly, or sexual harassment. But who cares? He was the best personality they had there. I hope every one of his fans cancels their subscription to Gamespot so the company knows exactly what their decision cost them.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 2:56PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well what do you expect them to say? "Yeah we fired him because he said something bad about the game."

Most of my anger is directed towards the bigwigs and corporate bastards of GS and Edios. I understand all of the staff are just doing their jobs and I respect that.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 3:29PM LouDogg said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Strangely, the bigwigs at GS and Eidos are doing their jobs. The execs' job at Eidos is to sell video games, and they are working to do just that. The people working at GS, their job is to sell ad space, and they are also trying to do that.

The problem is more within a compensation structure that has a conflict of interest with the reviewer's job. Fix that, and you'll have honest and accurate reviews.

Of course, fixing that is not that easy...
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 3:04PM Oldtaku said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
A short official comment that means NOT A @#$DAMN THING. Thanks, Gamespot.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Portabliss: Time Ducks (iOS)

Posted on Feb 7th 2012 9:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW