| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (76)

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 6:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That cat is mad at us.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:58PM rTwelve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Was that from that Cats vs Dogs movie? I think that was the Russian Blue.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 8:04PM Obienator said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Don't worry at least their War journalism is 100% accurate, afterall videogames are "fluff" pieces.
Reply

Posted: Dec 1st 2007 1:48AM ThornedVenom said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Looks like a cheap third-party peripheral to me.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 6:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
GameSpot take note, thats when you should start questioning your editors.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 10:27PM ruibing said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What in the world is wrong with all game-related editorials? Are they too busy playing games to write properly about them?
Reply

Posted: Dec 1st 2007 8:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
the problem is they're too busy NOT playing games, and have no idea what the hell they're talking about
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 6:50PM Burritoclock said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, but their political reporting is completely accurate.....
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:05PM Cheezeman3000 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Hahaha that's almost as funny. If anything this proves their editorial deficiency.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Their political reporting is accurate??? What NYT do you read? That is the funniest thing ive read all day. What's your follow up act?
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:55PM LaughingTarget said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Sarcasm + the internet rarely go well together.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 8:05PM rayonic said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
And to think, the NYTimes is probably just as accurate about every other topic. We just don't know it because we're not experts in those areas.

(And we don't read the NYT)
Reply

Posted: Dec 1st 2007 1:31PM hotpuck6 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i personally find that if someone makes a strong definitive statement on the internet, and it doesn't end in "/rant" that it is most probably sarcasm.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 6:51PM fischju said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
*head -> palm*
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 10:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Big toe -> eyesocket
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 6:51PM KentuckyFrydCow28 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
*witty comment connecting Gamespot with the NYTimes*
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 6:52PM strictnein said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Too late!
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 6:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ahahahaha
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 6:52PM SoulBlade said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This explains why so many people are either ignorant or retarded when it comes to most things reported by the media, not just video games.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 8:07PM ill trooper said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
This explains it? This explains NOTHING of the sort. This is a twig of an error in a media river of accurate reports, passing by every day. And there will likely be a correction posted in the next day. Where ELSE can people get information? The term "The Media" refers to every source of information you get that isn't discovered by yourself or told to you by acquaintances, and most of that is probably from a 'media' source.

If more people read the New York Times, they would be far more informed about events in the world. In fact, in this case, regular readers would likely question that $299 price as there are dozens of ads and inserts for BestBuy, Circut City, J & R, etc. letting you know that the PS3 is $399.

Although this is a ridiculous batch of errors, the Times is an excellent source of information, and always has been. Some strange errors in a 2007 holiday tech-gift guide are hardly enough to make me think the NYTimes is "why people are retarded."
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You're right. We'd be much better off as a society if no one consumed any media and just got all their information from word of mouth. This is easily the dumbest comment I've read all week.
Reply

Posted: Dec 1st 2007 3:53AM mvergeldedios said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Guys, chill out with the comments against SoulBlade.

SoulBlade was merely trying to use a canned response that would deem him "hip" and "cool" with his blatant apathy towards "The Media."
Reply

Posted: Dec 1st 2007 8:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You idiots jumping down his throat for insulting the media are the same as people who say don't criticize America and 'love it or leave it.'
He's not arguing for NO media, he's arguing for a BETTER media, and since all I've learned in the last six hours of news is NOTHING NEW regarding stacy peterson and bill clinton's 'against the war' comment.... I'd say I 100% agree that a media not so full of bullshit would make the world a much better place
Reply

Posted: Dec 1st 2007 4:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow Will. Just wow. I don't think I have ever, in my entire life, said, "America, love it or leave it." If I did, my family would think I'd been kidnapped and replaced by some crazy Bill O'Reilly android.

The point you two halfwits are missing is that "the media" includes everything from Fox News to CNN, the New York Times, Joystiq, Outdoor Life, Sports Illustrated, etc. To just say that Americans are stupid because we pay too much attention to "the media" is wrong-headed and idiotic, considering the alternative is, I don't know, getting all your news directly from the government, non-media big business or your neighbor.

Don't like what's on CNN? Don't watch it. There are plenty of other media out there worth paying attention to. I'm sure if you picked up, say, the New York Times (or the LA Times, the Washington Post or any other decent newspaper), you'd find that most of the articles there had nothing to do with Stacy Peterson or Bill Clinton's comments.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 12:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"The point you two halfwits are missing is that "the media" includes everything from..."

Even an idiot can figure out that he was referring specifically to *mainstream media* and not literally all media...A fact which flew clear over your head.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 6:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In other news, the model for Fat Cat in the live action Rescue Rangers movie has been cast...
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:00PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would be so upset if they were actually planning on making a live action Rescue Rangers movie.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:57PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
After this:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0952640/

I think you should have already lost enough hope in humanity to even think that way.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:00PM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gah, I hate lolcats.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:12PM velocitystrike said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You have no soul.
Reply

Posted: Dec 1st 2007 1:51AM ThornedVenom said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
But cats have 9 of them.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
And in other news, the sun rises in the east.

Really, the NY Times is terrible.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 8:04PM MrHashbrown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It does?

I honestly didn't know that.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 9:07PM ill trooper said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Does blurting out "The Times is terrible" make any sense? Do you even read newspapers?

I fail to see it.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 9:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Whoa!, I think some trooper here works or have someone dear working in NY Times....
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Wow, way to do your research Mr. Wayner.

And who proofed that article, anyway? You're fired, too.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:19PM Maxsunset said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It's just like the recent review of Haze in Maxim, which was printed before they had even announced the game had been pushed back to '08. douche bags...
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:19PM kompakter said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"It was the best of times, it was the BLURST of times??!! You stupid monkey!"
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:20PM SecondTomorrow said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Cell processor should make the 360 turn green with spots and have squeaky feet. It also gets killed by Gohan. It's a stupid reference...but I'm tired and very uncreative. This is why I don't read newspapers...morons. (I, myself am stupid for this post. And yet.....*falls asleep*)
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I saw a commercial the other day on TV that said "starting at $299" was a bit of a surprise to me...
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:34PM Vegnagun said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"But Lt.Dan you ain't got no legs"
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 8:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I felt crappy all day, and that is the one thing that really made me laugh.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:44PM PlatinumSkeet said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Someone at NYTimes just lost their job...
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Most people at the NY Times should lose their jobs. Full of idiots.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Two words: Rupert Murdoch
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:55PM aforty said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Rupert "Moron" Murdoch has nothing to do with the Times.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
G'ddammit, I just realized he bought the Journal, not the Times. I'll go back to my hole now.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 7:58PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Well, the Times does have its own brand of stupidity, though I do see how it they're easily confused. There isn't much difference in left wing stupidity and right wing stupidity.
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 8:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"There isn't much difference in left wing stupidity and right wing stupidity"

Let's just thank god that they haven't gotten together, that would be a whole new level of stupidity
Reply

Posted: Nov 30th 2007 8:07PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Don't cross the streams.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW