| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (82)

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 4:07AM blehh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
we're all behind ya Jeff! eff cash whoressss
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 11:04AM DWells55 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Exactly. I never was really a big GameSpot reader or particularly familiar with Jeff, but I fully support the guy. Anyone willing to stand by integrity and honesty over profit is cool by me. He did the right thing and is being punished for it by the greedy, so I'm completely behind him as well.

Good luck man.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 11:40AM sand0789 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think we necessarily know all the facts. It looks a certain way, but nobody has come out and said anything concrete. Often when someone is fired, they make up a reason that makes their employer look like hell. But, the fact that neither his employer or him are saying anything definate about why he was fired certianly makes it look like it was all or in part over the Kane and Lynch review. His video review probably humiliated Eidos (it was really bad) and Eidos had invested in an advertisement on their site.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 4:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Good to see that he's handling things in the best way possible, and not just flying off the handle.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 4:20AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Gamespot sucks it. I can't wait for some ugly truths to come out. Hopefully someone will confirm the worst, but I suspect Gamespot will just try to ride out the storm, along with Eidos - just ostrich and stick their heads in the sand and hope that gamers will just let them off the hook when some big flashy release comes out and sends the herd to another corner of the gaming world. Hold a grudge fellow gamers - make Gamespot and Eidos suffer!
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 4:26AM nmezib said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I hope to see him reviewing games soon. it's always good to have a hardline reviewer in video games journalism... someone to deflate some egos and keep everyone down to earth.

remember this is the same Gerstmann that gave "LoZ: Twilight Princess" an 8.8, prompting fanboys to respond by threatening to burn down his house and rape his pets. It's good to know we're all behind him on this one.

And for a laugh (no, I'm not making fun of him in any way), look up the symptoms of Gerstmann Syndrome. I learned in my neurosci class that its primary symptom just happens to be dysgraphia - the inability to write.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 4:35AM Xelloss said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Glad to here Jeff is still out there. Hopefully he can fully explain what happened and what is going to happen in the near future.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 12:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's not like they killed him. Why wouldn't he be out there?
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 4:55AM Supino said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
To me, GameSpot is dead now...
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 10:27AM jtenma said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I can't believe his "co-workers" at Gamespot aren't stepping up and saying/doing anything at all...there is a strange silence throughout the corporation. You mean to tell me they STILL support Gamespot?

There is obviously a little more to this story that is just aching to get out.

I wonder though, is Jeff really the good guy in this situation.?..What if he is not..?
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 12:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It's still a job and everyone working there has bills they need to pay. Also, they aren't legally allowed to discuss the status of other employees.

http://frankprovo.livejournal.com/

Read his blog if you want to hear the general consensus from the staff.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 12:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you just saw a co-worker and friend get fired for such an 'infraction' I don't think you'd be the first person to jump up and attack your employer. If they fired Jeff cause of the review, and it's still only an if, then they wouldn't bat an eyelid about sacking another editor for a more sackable offence.

Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 5:13AM zsavior said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have a problem here, you see it has to do with the sentence that he has been there for 11 years. If I worked some place 11yrs I should have some idea of what type of morality my company has. If what Eidos did was not the first of its kind at gamespot my question is what was the breaking point in this particular event.

Or maybe Mr Gertsmann has alway been a thorn in GS side not following their tainted rules and morals, thus incurring their full wrath this time, but then how did he survive all these years at this place. The more I hear this story the more intriguing it sounds.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 5:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I believe (and could be completely wrong, so please do correct me if so) that Gamespot recently came under new management through CNet, thus the companies "morality" could have changed drastically in the recent past.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 5:46AM zsavior said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
That would definitely make sense to me then. I also didn't know that I thought C/net owned it for sometime now.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 6:50AM azuravian said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gamespot has been a CNET property for a long while now.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 7:30AM MosquitoControl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you ever work at a place that has a money vs. morality aspect, you'll find that it's a constant battle. If this is indeed what happened, Jeff was likely there every day protecting the integrity of the brand.

It isn't like this only happens in this industry.
If you look at the mortgage industry you'll find a constant battle between loan officers and underwriters. LOs were allowed to win for a while, now our banks are crumbling.
Hollywood has the constant battle between the creative minds and the financiers demanding product placement, happy endings and big names.
Etc.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 10:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you have to understand that there have been many changing of heads over at gamespot and cnet over the last 3 years. vince broady, greg kasavin and ankarino lara all left last year. leaving vulrures from cnet to take hold and corrupt the whole system. (if you don't know who these people are... please google them)
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 11:18AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
CNET have owned for a long time. But, there's been some management changes at CNET in October. Stephen Colvin (formerly CEO of Maxim/Stuff/Blender) was appointed executive VP for Entertainment at CNET, overseeing Gamespot in particular. This might explain the shift in morality and why Gerstmann became suddenly so undesirable.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 12:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
After Greg Kasavin left he was replaced by a suit. So basically Gamespot is being run by marketing now.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 5:21AM Anticrawl said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Heh, Gamespot has been deing slowly for around 2 years like an old man with diabetes who doesn't know how to manage it. I personally have never really liked the guy. I use to respect him back when the site was called videogames.com but yeah his review style erks me. The nail in the coffin for me was how he decided to review Shadowrun, you know considering FASA kinda invented the Pen & Paper RPG the man had no place to comment on how the game didn't stick to its roots.

Hell Bungie has butchered their own Halo story more than FASA could have ever hoped to do with Shadowrun (they admit it themselves, they start developing a game without even having a full outline of where the story goes, they just let someone else come in and make sense of it all with the novels). That and the man insisted on reviewing games by what they weren't rather than what they were. Battlefield was a MP only game, sure it had more maps but they were hardly any memorable or original ones. I'd personally have less maps that are more diverse and note worthy.

Bah, all this doesn't matter about Jeff, stop feeling sorry for old shovel-face. He'll get work, no question. He has a loyal fan-base that will follow him in whatever endeavor he makes. In fact he will probably turn out to be better off for it.

What you should be worried about is how this will impact professional game critism and the industry as a whole.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 5:45AM zsavior said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Whoa you just said Videogames.com I was just talking to my friend about that. That site was greatness at the time, that is also why I never liked gamespot. In a sense I never felt good with the place after that change happened.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 5:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd love to see him as a developer that keeps a running blog.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 6:13AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jeff got fired because he did his job. his job was to tell the readers about crappy games... how will the remaining staff be able to do their job now, I wonder?

GS reviewer. hm, if I give this AAA title a 6, I might get fired, maybe I give it a 7, and everybody is happy, hm... maybe 7 is not enough, so I give it better an 8 , just to make sure I can keep my job, and hey, it is AAA, so I should appreciate it more. Maybe 9 is a perfect score....

I am sorry for the remaining staff, they have a hell of a job now!
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 6:14AM BananaBoat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Gertsmann was the only guy willing to tell people that Twilight Princess wasn't the best thing since sliced bread, and for that I'd support him to the ends of the Earth. I'm not sure how a journalist would go about trying "Game Development" though. I guess he could write stories for games, but how does journalism translate to coding skillz? Either way, I hope he lands a great job (a better job than he had) soon.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 6:27AM Otimus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah... but then he went on to say that Gears of War and Halo 3 ... WERE.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 6:44AM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's because they were.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 6:48AM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At least to me, and apparently to him.


Opinions are fun aren't they?
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 7:06AM NyghtcrawleR said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As to the comment about how journalism relates to coding. How do you know what skills he has other than journalism. Do you know his educational history, doubt it. Plus the fact that he could go back to school if he didnt already have the skills needed.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 9:27AM Crono141 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
If OoT is a perfect 10 game, and Twilight Princess did everything OoT did, only better, how is TP an 8.8?
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 9:55AM darkinchworm said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Crono, could it be that Twilight Princess was an 8-year-old title with a new coat of paint and some waggle?

Not to pan any of the Zelda titles - they're all good fun - but really, how is an 8.8 bad given that the series really hasn't seen much new?
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 10:21AM zsavior said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
ANd this is why Gertsmann and this saga will be forgotten. Gamers on a whole careless about Journalistic integrity on more about hearing the games they like and games they hate get good ratings and bad ratings.

See how the TP debate was brought back up, how does that help him at all? It doesn't it just proves to Eidos that gamers are fanboys. Makes me wonder if he would have the same amount of fans if he had crapped on Gears of War, or Bio shock.

What will people say, "But those were better games!" and that is the problem, journalistic integrity shouldn't go to favoritism it should be something that is up held every time you review a story give an editorial or convey your opinion in your job. Right now gamers don't ask for anything more than to be wrangled around like sheep.

"OH yes LAIR Got Destroyed HA AHA AHA! Oh what the hell Assassins Creed didn't get the numbers I want! Well I like that game make them change it make them change it!"

I hope this guy is being supported because he took a stand for integrity, I didn't agree with his TP review, but I do agree with the right for a reporter to give an honest unbiased opinion, with out the interference of corporate hands. But I don't think that lesson is ready for a majority of gamers right now. Not all gamers but the mass only care about system wars and flame baits and as long as that brings hits to a site corporations will manipulate the reviews how they like.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 2:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Amen.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 6:18AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
The headline is misleading. It made it sound like he was goint to work for Future.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 6:39AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It sucks that the good guys get punished for not playing the corporate game. Nice exclusive, btw.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 6:47AM ClarkyCat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How exactly is Gerstmann's inability to comment on the matter a "Joystiq exclusive"?
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 6:49AM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well the fact that he's saying something other than repeating he got fired, and the fact that this is only on joystiq makes it exclusive.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 6:51AM ClarkyCat said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Erm, he already said the same thing on Facebook though!
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 6:59AM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
FACEBOOK DOESN'T COUNT!!!!
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 11:26AM KyleOrl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually, all he said on facebook to Valleywag was that he couldn't comment on the matter (something he had earlier told Joystiq... see the "legal reasons" link in the story above.) Here he expanded a bit about defending his review and his plans for the future, which is exclusive to Joystiq. Might not be the key info everyone is looking for, but it is exclusive.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 3:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i think gamespot is on to something, they need to need to fire more of their reviewers.

eidos should hire jeff as a developer. then eidos might make something decent.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 7:40AM bspence11 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm behind Jeff in this situation, but he has the worst on screen presence of anyone I've ever seen. Dude, you're on camera, get to a gym...

Whenever I see him, it's like he's reinforcing the stereotype of gamers being fat and lazy.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 8:12AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Ever been inside a Gamestop? I think you'll find that gamers themselves are doing a pretty good job of reinforcing the stereotype of gamers being fat and lazy.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 7:25AM kev670 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well I'm glad he's staying in the editorial business (please let it be 1up) Please post a comment about his gamercard. He got the achievements for the game on the 27th and 28th of november. A long time after the review went live
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 11:26AM KyleOrl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jeff addressed this directly in the story above.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 7:33AM Dajmin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm with you Jeff.
Journalism should not and cannot be influenced by advertisers. Readers rely on these reviews to choose where best to spend their money - if advertisers controlled that then all games would get 100% and we'd be better off without them.

It's called "freedom of speech" and "free press".

Good luck with whatever you decide to do!
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 8:03AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The best On the Spot presenter by miles, a breath of fresh air, gonna miss his sharp humour and shame for the industry if he's not back reviewing soon. RIP Gamespot
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 8:28AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've never liked Gamespot. I always thought their reviews were a bit off, obviously because they are getting payola. Good, they were the first ones to charge a fee to read their stuff, they're the first to go down. I mean Cnet come on!

The crazy thing is, this could bring about a government inquiry to the whole situation, as it did with radio in the '50's. It could be a huge issue, or it could just be wiped under the rug and forgotten about. I kind of doubt it though, the videogame industry is too large to allow this kind of thing. Watch out IGN! They have to be on the take as well.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 12:01PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ummm what? That's not true. I think you're confusing yourself with IGN. Gamespot has never charged viewers to read stuff at the site. The only thing subscribers get that basic users don't is HD quality videos of trailers and shit like that. But all content such as reviews and coverage are for everyone.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2007 8:25AM Samoth said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wish Jeff the best on his jobsearch. It would be great to have him on the IGN or 1up podcasts.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Portabliss: Sticky Bees (iOS)

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 9:00PM

Now Playing: February 6-12, 2012

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 5:45PM

Sanctum 2 defends PC, consoles in 2013

Posted on Feb 6th 2012 9:00AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW