| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (15)

Posted: Dec 4th 2007 4:39PM xenocidic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
On that topic, I think Monopoly XBLA could make for a fun and engaging title.

...except when you get those jerks that never want to trade and just delay the game inevitably!

Posted: Dec 4th 2007 8:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Monopoly, Scrabble, and Risk would all be guaranteed top sellers on XBLA. Somebody is losing money every day those games aren't on Live.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 1:33AM Daman09 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hell, if Uno can sell well, I wouldn't be surprised if Monopoly or Risk wouldn't do spectacular. I would in fact buy Risk if it were made available.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2007 4:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I downloaded and tried it today.

Me: former M:tG player and a current Legends of Norrath (EQ and EQ2 based online card game) as well as a rabid risk/monopoly/Settlers of Catan player.

The game sucked. The graphics were downright ugly in a few spots....your avatar had "jaggies" in some instances! The gameplay feels like it will come down to simply gathering the most powerful cards and hoping luck is on your side. Give me strategies other that the basic one please.

Posted: Dec 4th 2007 6:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
That's so weird. You'd fit so well into my group of friends based on the games you'd describe, except that we're all Culdcept addicts (the PS2 version). We're all Magic vets (playing since Revised) and board game freaks (Catan, War of the Ring, Ra, Ticket to Ride, Peurto Rico).

This game isn't about graphics, and I can't believe you'd dismiss it because of that. The game is about deep strategy, collecting and the fine tuning your deck. With almost 500 cards in the full game, there are tons of different combos to use, and many different deck archtypes to design. Like I said in another post, I won a tournament in the PS2 version using a deck with no creatures at all.

Sure, there's an element of luck to it, but only slightly more than Magic. You tune your deck, balancing casting costs with power levels, creatures vs. spells vs. equipment, etc, and optimize your chances of drawing the cards you need, just like in Magic. The dice add an additional luck element of course, but even your roll (or the roll of others) can be controlled with your cards.

As a Magic vet, it's a shame that you can't see how much of a treasure this game is. And as a 360 owner, it's a shame that you can't acknowledge how lucky we are to have it, because it REALLY should have come out on the PS3.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2007 5:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This review def makes me sad. I was hoping we were at least getting a new card game for the xbox/360, even if there were no story. I wasn't even considering a board game with a slight card twist :(
I'll give the demo a shot still, but I have a hard time seeing why I would ever pick this one up for real (unless it shows up on half.com for lik $3).
Maybe next time my anti-social card game brothers . . .

Posted: Dec 4th 2007 9:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This looks very similar to the PS2 version.

That is, this looks great. While the visuals are lacking, the depth and variety of cards and strategies are the core of the game. "Magic meets Monopoly" is about right. There is a CCG element to it, and there is a board game element to it.
All I need to know is if multiplayer is added on Live, and I'm set.

Posted: Dec 4th 2007 6:02PM spambot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I’ll give the demo a shot when I get the chance. It does sound interesting.

Is it me, or does this seem more appropriate for an XBLA game? I thought it was from the screenshots.

Posted: Dec 4th 2007 6:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is a worthy successor to the PS2 version, and to be honest, I bought my 360 because MS secured the exclusive. 80% of the people that play this game will hate it, much like the PS2 version, but those that like are pretty dedicated.

The demo doesn't really show you how grand the game is, as the brunt of the game is played in multiplayer. Sure, the demo has a multiplayer feature, but it only offers 4 basic pre-constructed decks to play. There are over 400 cards to collect in the full version, and you can trade cards with your friends, etc., and build decks with tons of different strategies. Hell, I have even won a tournament with an entirely creatureless deck.

Don't judge it by the graphics, it's not meant to shine in that category. The gameplay is deep and immersive once you get into it, and the number of card combonations are endless. If you like strategic, multi-player games with a hardcore collection element to them, this is for you.

Posted: Dec 4th 2007 9:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In regards to your earlier response: I am properly chastised.

I didn't mean to dismiss it merely for the graphics and I'm sorry that I came across as that. It may be very fun and I do admit that I'll try it a second time. I simply don't like the way the game plays and feels. I do see the appeal, but I can fault it for graphics, some game play elements that really bother me, and even price. I do know that I haven't seen whats in the full game, but I feel that I'd get more "bang" for my gaming buck by playing Legends of Norrath.

That being said, I think if I saw it at 20 dollars, I'd be more interested.

Sorry to upset you earlier...live and learn?
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2007 10:15PM Softserve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've actually been thinking about this game a lot more than I figured I would after playing the demo. I'm pretty sure I'll pick it up, maybe I'll get to play some of you guys online :).

Posted: Dec 4th 2007 10:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
AfroCelt -

Sorry, dude. Didn't mean to come off as an ass. Some of us Culdcept fans are pretty fanatical about the game. Considering I bought my 360 for Culdcept Saga, you could probably consider me one of them. :)

Posted: Dec 4th 2007 11:28PM Rax Dakkar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I played they game, and though I only played for a short period of time, I was hooked. I used to play Magic and a few other CCGs and I really liked the way this one plays. Yeah, theirs a bit of luck involved, but that allows for a sort of underdog feel, where you haven't lost till the game is over. I am now phenomenally interested in this game and the sounds of a DS game also intriuge me.

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 9:21AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
After playing, I def could see how this could be fun. Monopoly meets magic is rediculously spot on. It no longer has to be $3, I would be happy with $10 or so. Hopefully since its cheap, people will get it for christmas, hate it, and pop it up for cheap on the olllllllll internets. Fingers crossed.

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 10:17AM Captain Obvious said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This game = right up my alley.

Now if only Wizards would release MTGO for the XBLA....

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW