| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (50)

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 11:28AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Is this still going on?
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 11:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
oh, the eidos site finally dropped the lies about the 5 star reviews? about damn time
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 11:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Seriously, no one cares anymore.

This story has been beaten to death.

Can we start reporting on real gaming news now?
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 11:57AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I still care. I am someone.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:11PM copa said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"Can we start reporting on real gaming news now?"

You bet. Eidos just released a new game that is getting five-star reviews across the board. It does a good job of moving the action around, and you'll see a variety of different environments.

You may remember how well this same sort of stuff worked in the developer's previous squad-based game, Freedom Fighters. If you've been waiting patiently for a game to really dive into the whole "crew-based heist tale" concept, you may enjoy the unique nature of its story.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 11:40AM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Today is Day of the Ninja: http://dayoftheninja.com/index2.html
I decree we all ninja stealth kill AHfhasd
SAHSD...
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 11:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Best day of the year after the Weasel Stomping Day.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 11:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mmm, Weasel Stomping Day... gotta get my big boots on for that!
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 1:49PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can we really trust you after being a pirate after so long? You still have that parrot in your avatar. ;P
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 3:59PM hvnlysoldr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Quit it before your eye needs a patch.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 11:43AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Ugh. I am so fucking done with this.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Feel free not to read news that does not interest you. You don't need to read it, and you don't even need to comment on it.

For the rest of us, however, this represents an important inspection of the relationship between the gaming press and the gaming publishers. I hope you can find it in your heart to humor these silly distractions of ours.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 11:49AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
fgts liek omg shup

Diz iz vidiya gaym newz
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 11:51AM Lamppost said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
N'Gai Croal's Newsweek piece is fucking SPECTACULAR, and everyone should read it.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:06PM copa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed. He did not rush to post something as part of the 24-hour news cycle, and he does not speculate on things that he has no knowledge of.

He merely recounts some of his first-hand experiences, and does an analysis of the whole ecosystem. Don't know much about Gamespot Trax? Me neither, but N'Gai explains why it's important here.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 11:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Look at all the ADD posts! Come on people, it's the general public's lack of focus that lets big companies successfully screw over the little guy like this. You may not be interested anymore (only days after) but that doesn't change the fact that a good man is still out a job for unacceptable reasons. Give this the attention it deserves so that history doesn't repeat itself.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ditto
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:57PM sand0789 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
After personally viewing his written and video review, I think he was being unprofessional and deserved to be fired. He started the rumor as revenge for the company that kicked his no talent ass to the curb. This rumor will land him a job anywhere he wants to go.

I hate when inheritantly evil individuals try to screw over charitable and honorable corporations. I also hate people that always go into threads playing devil's advocate. Oh, and the Dutch.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 11:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Let it die. The man was fired under suspicious terms, Gamespot sucks, and Kain & Lynch is a craptacular game. I get it...
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 11:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
This was a weekend discussion. Can we move on, please?
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 11:57AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I really didn't care about this story to begin with and now that it has been run into ground countless times, I care even less. Seriously, I'm into gaming for the games and not the fucking review scores. This has just gotten absurd at this point.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 11:58AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ugh. I am so fucking not done with this.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Let. It. Die.

Nobody cares anymore except for the websites rabidly posting microbits of non-information on this issue on an hourly basis, desperate for hits. It's sensationalism at its best.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:06PM brianb said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Being an "instant internet celeb" doesn't put food on the table, I hardly believe Gerstmann gets any consolation from the fact that this is a big story.

And I think it's incredibly stupid (Fernando) to want to ignore this story. Everyone on this site is incredibly invested in games (both with our time and money) and the credibility of games journalism is at stake here. If this ends up being true and GameSpot is really succumbing to advertiser's wishes I think it knocks down their and all of CNet's game and product coverage. It also makes you wonder about IGN & EGM/1UP and whether the same things could be going on there.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You'd be a fool if you think this is the first time it's happened or even the last time it's happened or that this little internet whine-fest will deter it from ever happening again. The only reason this was even noticed this time is because Penny Arcade made a little comic about it.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
good thing i never visit those game sites anyway, i just rely on average user reviews

I do care about this issue though, because it still sucks, but it's not like gamspot's getting my money or ad-views anyway (and I never look at ads anyway)
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:07PM ratm said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Stop bitching around. Simply don't look at Gerstmann posts and leave the comment section for people who care.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:09PM Rocketboy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Ya, who cares. It happened like, what, earlier than yesterday? Screw that.

/jk/
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:35PM ComicShaman said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm sure the ADD posts here are very comforting to Gamespot. "Fortunately, much of our audience has the attention span of a concussed hummingbird. They'll forget about it by next Thursday."

Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:18PM EternalEcho said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I still care. For those in the same boat, I'm going to throw up my opinion on the matter one final time. It's the second post on http://www.staticechoe.blogspot.com
Thanks to all who have checked it out already and those who intend to. You guys are why I write.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:27PM EternalEcho said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I'm glad I'm not the only one who never gave a fuck about this "news". I think they guy, and 90% of the other "workers" there, should have been fired years and years ago.

And everyone already knew Gamespot was biased, so what's the shocking part of this news? That he didn't follow his biased for once? Wow!
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I still don't buy it.

He probably got fired for a lack of professional attitude or appearance, and no one wants to (or can, legally) speak to that fact.

The whole situation, because everyone has to be professional and necessarily tight-lipped, is giving trigger happy conspiracy theorists free reign, basically.

Just hold your line, CNET. There's not a shred of evidence amounting to any more than he-said she-said, and in a week all these gossip-mongers will be feigning indignation about the next sensationalist contrived rumor.

All it takes is to ask someone who's ever been fired for good or even understandable reasons. No one wants to talk about it, it happened and we should all just let this guy get back to figuring out what his next step in life is and move on. If you are questioning GameSpot's "journalistic" (it's a game site, for Zod's sake) integrity, then stop going. Don't make this guy's firing any worse than it already is, at this point I can't see how any of this isn't just adding very public insult to injury.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Sony Computer Entertainment America came down on the site for scoring Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction a 7.5..."

7.5 is well above average; what's wrong, Sony? did you pay for an 8??

"Sarcastic Gamer isn't feeling too sorry for Gerstmann..."

I believe the author IS feeling sorry. (i think they were being SARCASTIC)
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 12:36PM spoo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This sort of tight lip bullshit is why lawyers and corporate America sucks.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 1:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They say in the podcast not to blame gamespot and its a management issue but how else do you get the management's attention?
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 1:35PM Halorin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was going to say something about people being dumb and needing more things to do with their life that make a comment just to say they don't want to read the topic, but then I realized that I had better things to do than to waste that kind of energy on something I didn't want to do. Oh wait.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 1:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
This reminds me, somewhat, of the Payola radio scandal.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 1:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Someone is voting down anyone who complains about this topic. That just provides more evidence for my theory that only basement dwelling retarded virgins care about this story.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 1:54PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm secretly voting them up because I think that their point of views are valid as well. Don't let the zeitgeist catch you folks, emotions don't equate to rationalization.

Crap, my secret activities aren't so secret anymore.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 2:07PM Eugimon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
maybe they're being voted down because other people understand that stuff like that has far deeper implications for this industry than just a momentary diversion.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 2:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The nerve, those comments that don't actually have anything constructive to say are being voted down.

Don't get discouraged, we all secretly enjoy it when you whine.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 2:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
If you really still care about what video game sites run buy big corporations who take money from the very same companies that they review then you deserve to be called a basement dwelling retarded virgin. Seriously... once you get some type of education under your belt and learn about the real world you will understand that some crap like this means nothing.

Many sites and periodicals are influenced by advertising. People rant and rave about Japanese game mags and pretend that they are impervious to this type of corruption but it happens there all the time.

Grow up and stop paying attention to reviews.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 2:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Maybe we're voting them down because they shouldn't be commenting if they don't care about the topic.

After all, we have all the time in the world now that the dog beat us over the fence to make them some siblings. Again.

Signed,

Basement Dwelling Retarded Virgins
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 2:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Gavin

And maybe you're right, but at least your last comment put forward an opinion the topic. Despite its holier-than-thou air, it's much more thought-provoking than "This topic sucks."
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 4:47PM Eugimon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nice logic there, "it happens all the time..." so what? so we ignore it? So we send a message to publications, that some of us pay money to read, that their advertisers are more important than their customers? We send a message to game publishers that the marketing of the game is more important than the game itself?

How many of you people that are calling this non-news, are the same people who cry and moan that games like halo and mass effect are over-hyped? How many of you piss about better games not getting enough exposure to become popular. And now, when we have a shot at actually exposing and fixing the corporatization of the gaming industry with this very public fallout, you want to bitch and moan that it's not news?
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 2:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Movie Review - North - BY ROGER EBERT / July 22, 1994
I hated this movie. Hated hated hated hated hated this movie. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant audience-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it. Hated the implied insult to the audience by its belief that anyone would be entertained by it.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 2:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is amazing to me. Demanding "church and state" division between editorial and advertising? I agree... that would be great. Though if the U.S. government can't pull a division between church and state, I don't see how game "journalists" are supposed to.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 4:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2007 6:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That was quite funny
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW