| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (22)

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 10:06AM bantam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can't wait to try it out, renegade was a blast!
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 10:11AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope that you can operate a tiberium harvester in the game, would be perfect!
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 10:56AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I heard the Tiberium Harvester will be playable in Big Rigs 2.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 10:29AM Bearxor said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I love and still play Renegade's MP online. It's awesome.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 10:40AM zero21xxx said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Haha, with whom?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 10:50AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I also thought it was kind of interesting. or maybe I am being too kind.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 11:04AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@zero,
There's still a community of players. The game got extra shelf life thanks to post-release efforts by the community to nullify cheating and adding extra maps.

Personally, I loved it more than the original Battlefield, which came out in the same period. Everyone says the game was ill conceived- I say the concept was fabulous, it just got hung up because Westwood didn't have experience with FPS netcode and design.

That said, no other FPS can satisfy like the "doink" noise made when you kill someone in Renegade online.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 12:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Matt_m,

Remember when they added aircraft? I miss that game.. but I don't miss stupid Flame Tank rushes on my useless AGT.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2007 2:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait... you can still play it online!?!!?

I actually bought this game and haven't played it in years thinking the servers would have been killed off!


Btw, Renegage is wicked good it just had lots of lag,connection issues!
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 10:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can EA succeed where Blizzard (Activision) tried and placed into indefinate hold?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 11:00AM Stupidiot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can't say I don't already have enough first-person shooters, but I think I'll keep an eye out for this one. Never played Renegade, though.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 11:04AM FredFredrickson said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Renegade was fun for about 30 minutes... kind of in the same way it was fun to see all the Warcraft 3 buildings in WoW from the ground level for the first time. It was indeed a mess though - and hopefully not one that EA will repeat.

At least they are just calling it Tiberium, and not attaching the C&C name to it, so if it does stink, the brand won't be hurt very much.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 11:06AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There's an 8-page feature of this game in the new GamesTM (Brit mag), complete with a bunch of screenshots. They actually look kinda uninspired, reminds me a bit of that Warhammer 40,000 FPS or whatever it was called. Nonetheless that's just the visuals and it's too early to judge anyway.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 1:43PM Jomolungma said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's also the cover story for the new issue of Game Informer. Not surprising that EA would confirm its existence when gaming magazines are publishing articles on the game. In fact, I got my issue of GI two days ago - did it take EA that long to confirm a game that they allowed a cover article to be written on?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 11:11AM GenBanks said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm hoping that by 'squad tactics' they mean that they're going to implement the system used in Brothers in Arms. That's still my favourite tactical FPS, and it would be interesting to bring that system into a setting other than WW2.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 12:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
there is a big story about this in the Game Informer i just got yesterday
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:34PM AKinferno said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There is a big article in Game Informer as well. It came out a week ago. It is also the cover story. So this really wasn't a rumor.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 12:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I should HOPE they confirmed it. Its on the cover of the Game Informer I got in the mail yesterday.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 1:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll bet this runs on the same engine as the Battlefield Series -- it already has limited 'top-down' views for commanders, not to mention its great squad support.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2007 5:10AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought DICE created and developed the Battlefield engine. Wouldn't that make it unlikely for a different dev team to use it?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 2:15PM andrew07 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I kind of liked it. I also seem to recall it wasn't very short, which just about all of FPSes today can be accused of. After seeing crazy review scores this year (8.0 for Uncharted? 9.5 for Crysis or World in Conflict? REALLY?!) and the Gamespot debacle, I couldn't care less what press says. I've played a fair bit of games now in my top 10 of all time that didn't get very high scores (Xenosaga Ep.1 7.9? REALLY?!). Renegade was fun. Hell, even Fear expansion packs were fun (mindless entertainment). More fun than the stupid Korean Supermen "bullets can't hurt me" Crysis, to be sure.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2007 6:20AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Renegade is widely underrated in my opinion ... well at least the multiplayer was. Ahead of its time.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW