GameDaily concluded its "Persons of the Year" feature today by announcing Nintendo America's COO Reggie Fils-Aime took the top spot; Microsoft's Larry "Major Nelson" Hryb took the readers' choice award. Fils-Aime bested Activision CEO Bobby Kotick (
#2) and Harmonix CEO Alex Rigopulos (
#3) because of the Wii's
phenomenal success in the
States. GameDaily had previously announced #4 and #5, which went to
Aaron Greenberg and Jeff Gerstmann respectively.
Major Nelson --
guru of Xbox -- received the
readers' choice award after politely directing his loyal readership to GameDaily's website. Before Major Nelson stepped up his campaign,
Assassin's Creed producer Jade Raymond was in the lead. Too bad Raymond didn't win though, GameDaily ended up having "Men of the Year" awards rather than "Persons of the Year."
Read -- 2007 Persons of the Year #1
Read -- Persons of the Year: Readers' Choice Unveiled
(Page 1) Reader Comments
Developers and Engineers deserve these awards.
Reply
Ooh burn.
also, who the f is major nelson? joystiq mentions him every once in a while but doesn't say much
Major Nelson = XBL as
Cliff B = Epic
or TwoZeroFOur = Infinity Ward
or Frankie = Bungie.
I want names, not "the guy who coded the physics in crysis" or something.
Because it was likely a team of people who coded the physics in crysis.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
just wtf did they do for gaming?
Approve the giant marketing budgets of a new impractical series and a used-to-be-revolutionary-but-now-repetitive series?
Reply
The only thing Nintendo has done differently is make a gimmicky peripheral the main controller, rather than a poor selling add-on later on. That pulled in mass market appeal, and once the mass market gets tired of playing Wii Sports, cause there's nothing else, the wii will begin it's traditional Nintendo console death cycle.
Disclosure: I own a Wii, i camped out over night for it, i have not sold it despite only having bought 2 games and renting a handful more. I love Nintendo, Zelda, and Mario... but Nintendo needs to get it's shit together and stop relying on hand helds and just letting this wave of console sales crash on top of them instead of taking full advantage of it. Someone in that company needs a business degree.
Reply
you do realize that you just said the manufacturer of the most phenomenally selling console in recent history (we'll have to check back in 10 years to see if it annihilates the PS2 as well) to go back to business school? Do you understand how ignorant that makes you sound?
Business is about making money.. guess what- somebody at nintendo realized the 'niche market' is actually the majority of the population on this planet, and designed a console around usability. That is business genius.
Having said that, I personally hate the wii.. there's not a single game on it that I'm dying to play, nor are there any announced for the future that pique my interest. But as far as business goes, Nintendo is genius.
If you read my statement, my point wasn't that Nintendo isn't able to sell it's console, it's that it is not properly utilizing it's current popularity to the fullest and ensuring it's long term staying power in the market, which it absolutely does not.
No games = No staying power, and once Mom sees that the wii hasn't been turned on in a year, it's probably going in the basement or attic and no more games are bought for it. While Nintendo was the only console maker to turn a profit off it's hardware this round of console wars, the real money in video games is in the licensing of actual games, which are no where to be seen.
The Wii managed to sell purely off of hype and ease of use, there was no marketing genius there, they took a basic formula for product success and applied it to the video game hardware. Their commercials are laughable, nearly as bad as Sony's obscure shit. They "borrowed" the sleek white styling from apple. Motion sensitive controls have been done before, and once people get over the gimmick of that, the Wii's ONLY advantage is a low entry cost.
As i said above, their lack of ability to provide enough stock shows their lack of faith in their own product. If you don't think a product will sell, you don't create a couple million until the demand exists, which is exactly what happened.
Tennis players don't one day say "Man, I'm so bored of tennis, I think I'll stop playing tennis forever". Why should wii-tennis players say the same thing.
And seriously: underproducing? Its the fasting selling home console in history. No console has had the kind of demand the Wii has. Even favorable predictions said it would only be sold out for 4 months after launch,
Is Sony producing 1.8 million PS3's a month? Is Microsoft producing 1.8 million 360's a month? I very much doubt it. They're probably producing half that, if even that much.
Ability to provide enough stock involves a hell of a lot more factors than "lets make more of them". I work in manufacturing. Lead times on new production lines is up to 6 months to a year. Unless you know anything about how stuff gets made, you're better off keeping your opinions to yourself about it, because you sound like a noob.
Or you could say, even if your assertion was 100% correct and not due to huge game sales and a few quality releases, that the Wii's huge success in the US is due to its marketing.
Which is Reggie.
PS: Wii was outperforming the DS for a couple months in the US. Yep, absolute handheld reliance. :P
I agree with you on that. Actually I think the fact that Nintendo is under-producing has helped fuel the sales of the Wii. Many people feel that they must have it simply because they cannot get it.
"Ability to provide enough stock involves a hell of a lot more factors than "lets make more of them". I work in manufacturing. Lead times on new production lines is up to 6 months to a year. Unless you know anything about how stuff gets made, you're better off keeping your opinions to yourself about it, because you sound like a noob."
you should recognize that they had little faith initially by having such small output and are now not able to play catch up. Sony doesn't need to produce that much because they had an initial stock to meet demand and have had constant reserves.
Does everyone forget how the 360 faced similar production issues just 2 years ago? except MS had stockpiled a bit, and their demand wasn't as high as the wii, but it has had steady demand since. Also, MS saw the increased demand for their product and managed to open up new distribution channels and production BY SPENDING MONEY. 6-12 months is normal lead time, but if you want things done, and have resources, the process can be achieved much quicker. They are not catering to the consumer and looking to get consoles in peoples hands NOW, before they get bored.
But what people seem to miss is that my point is Nintendo is NOT NOT NOT utilizing it's current popularity.
The Hardware sells like crack, and has not needed any marketing past it's inital "Hey, look what i can do" Demos(Especially not the "We would like to play shit"), but thats only the beginning of the console life cycle. If you push a product out the door and don't support it past point of sale, it's going to crash after that initial surge, which is most likely is going to happen unless Nintendo starts looking forward.
"Tennis players don't one day say "Man, I'm so bored of tennis, I think I'll stop playing tennis forever". Why should wii-tennis players say the same thing."
Oh, thats right, because Wii sports has so much depth.
I assume you have played your favorite game non-stop for the last 10 years then? If Wii sports has this gripping staying power that you claim, than the big N is truly fucked, because the only game people need comes with the system.
Nintendofanbot:
"Wii was outperforming the DS for a couple months in the US. Yep, absolute handheld reliance"
a few months of outperforming the DS? Do you know how many YEARS straight handhelds have dominated Nintendo's sales? The only, and i mean ONLY, thing keeping Nintendo in the hardware business for the last 5-8 years was handhelds.
Reply
3 CEOs? The Troika of the Year. I have not heard anything admiring about anyone except for Reggie. CEo is generally not the glam position in the media/entertainment business. I guess they had to pick somebody.
Man, gaming needs to grow bigger. Next year it will be Jerry Bruckheimer and Spielberg, you watch. (Dont blink)
Reply
*googles*
Reply
Reply
Packwolf
Reply