| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (61)

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
See, the thing is... This is stupid. This article is stupid. This isn't news. It's not Joystiq's fault - there has been so little news today that they HAVE to sling shit like this up there.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:22PM Vol said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I predict I am first post.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:31PM samfish said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I predict you though you were at the Newsarama forums.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:37PM Vol said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You are correct.

Motion based games just do not appeal to me. I enjoy sitting on plush couch, unwinding at the end of the day playing a game.

Games are not a workout. That's why I go to the gym and get away from a TV. Video games are trying to do too much.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:45PM Zoesch said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Pachter is that you?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:06PM mr nimblewick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Games are not a workout. That's why I go to the gym and get away from a TV. "

Personally, I hate working out, but I love playing games. Why not try to get in shape while playing?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:57PM heypaul said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"Personally, I hate working out, but I love playing games. Why not try to get in shape while playing?"

Because that makes playing games an entirely different experience. I've lived in Asia for about 10 years, where the arcade scene is still thriving and filled with innovative, experimental content - much of which constitutes as excer-gaming. The most notable example, and ones of the few to cross over to the West is Dance Dance Revolution, but plenty of lesser known examples exist. There are games where you race by physically peddling a bike, games where you fight raging river rapids by furiously paddling a rowboat, games where you use a camera to take paparazzi photos of on-screen celebrities, and games where you take a dog for a stroll by walking on a treadmill. Whenever a new one of these games popped up, crowds would gather, laugh and cheer at the brave souls who lined up to embarass themselves and amuse the rest of us. Within days, however, the mob of onlookers would dissipate and retreat back to their dark corners to watch the experts play Street Fighter.

My point with all this is twofold. First, it's much more difficult for these games with novel control schemes to develop a gameplay system as deep and involving as a game with traditional controls. They're great fun the first time you try it, but after the novelty wears off, you're left with shallow gameplay mechanics with a shiny new peripheral. Second, sure, there are times when getting exercise while gaming is an added benefit, but the rest of the time, you'd rather just sit down on a couch and play some Street Fighter.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 6:17PM Vol said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mr. Nimblewick:

Wrong.. it may be a slight cardiovascular exercise, but it's nothing compared to actual running or lifting weights. If anything, it should be considered "semi-exercise."
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 6:15PM mr nimblewick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Because that makes playing games an entirely different experience. I've lived in Asia for about 10 years, where the arcade scene is still thriving and filled with innovative, experimental content - much of which constitutes as excer-gaming. The most notable example, and ones of the few to cross over to the West is Dance Dance Revolution, but plenty of lesser known examples exist. There are games where you race by physically peddling a bike, games where you fight raging river rapids by furiously paddling a rowboat, games where you use a camera to take paparazzi photos of on-screen celebrities, and games where you take a dog for a stroll by walking on a treadmill. Whenever a new one of these games popped up, crowds would gather, laugh and cheer at the brave souls who lined up to embarass themselves and amuse the rest of us. Within days, however, the mob of onlookers would dissipate and retreat back to their dark corners to watch the experts play Street Fighter.

My point with all this is twofold. First, it's much more difficult for these games with novel control schemes to develop a gameplay system as deep and involving as a game with traditional controls. They're great fun the first time you try it, but after the novelty wears off, you're left with shallow gameplay mechanics with a shiny new peripheral. Second, sure, there are times when getting exercise while gaming is an added benefit, but the rest of the time, you'd rather just sit down on a couch and play some Street Fighter."

I disagree.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 7:19PM mr nimblewick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Wrong.. it may be a slight cardiovascular exercise, but it's nothing compared to actual running or lifting weights. If anything, it should be considered "semi-exercise.""

Hold on now, this type of gaming is still theoretical. Last I checked, there is not a machine like this on the market. You have no idea what types of the games they could make for it. Whether it can be considered excercise or not remains to be seen.

I was just voicing the opinion that I would rather excercise as part of a game than doing a bunch of reps in a gym that charges me $60/month. And I live in the northern part of the country, so exercise outside in the winter is difficult.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
we've been wanting that for 10 years now

it's still like 25 years away
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I'm still waiting for that damn sphere I can hold in my hand and get thrust into a hyper-realistic video game.

Damn you Sony, release the PSIX!!! You must have the technology after seeing how fantastic the PS3 was.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:22PM Vol said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Darn.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:23PM plyx said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Just give me a holodeck or one of those devices in Strange Days and I'll be good to go.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:27PM Jeremy White said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Please don't tell me I'm the only one out there who thinks that "motion-gaming" is a dumb idea?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:41PM AirIntake said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Until motion gaming means a goddamn holodeck, I agree with you.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:07PM mr nimblewick said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Thankfully, it's entirely possible to reach holodeck-level gaming without taking any steps toward it. All we have to do is keep increasing polygon counts and total immersion will just "happen."
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Im happy with a traditional controller, fuck this shit
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 6:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
A traditional controller? Do you mean a keyboard, a dial, or a joystick with one button?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:28PM Jwrose said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
well, if it hits before 2015, then Back to the Future II would have been right- when Marty shows the kids that they have to use the light gun to play Hogan's Alley.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
7 years to go
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:29PM Jeremy White said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Exactly. Get to work on making some kind of, all-in-one controller that is COMFORTABLE before we take these futuristic leaps into the future.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:33PM samfish said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
That could be cool, just so long as it's also possible for me to sit my duff on the couch and play something, too.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
This is going to be so awesome and relevant, just like Virtual Reality was, right guys? Guys?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:38PM Vol said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have a feeling virtual reality isn't dead yet.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2007 9:59AM charleytony said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually Bill Gates called it first ,, he talked about that just alittle bit after the Wii was announced, that was even before the xbox 360 came out !!!!
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
if nintendo ever did this their cameras would binge disposable batteries in the manner their remotes currently do.

they must have interest in that sector as they always warned against using rechargeables and it took them a long time (GameBoyAdvance SP) to get them into their systems.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:09PM mr nimblewick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What a strange way to go off topic.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Kyle Orland brought up Nintendo not me.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 5:02PM heypaul said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It's funny, isn't it? Sony and Microsoft are the pioneers in this area with their pre-existing cameras and supporting software, yet somehow the story is spun so Nintendo gets the credit for a technology that they haven't even shown any interest in implementing. What the...?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:47PM waynski1457 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i dunno, some developers cant even get the wii right...

off-topic: even tho i see this pic way too much, i couldnt help but break out laughing when i saw it. kthxbai!
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
By the way, why is this filed under "Hacks, Nintendo Wii, Wireless" when Sony and Microsoft are the ones currently offering camera based gaming?

Just wondering.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:40PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Because you care enough to bash Nintendo in 90% of your posts?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"You just set up the cameras around the room and wave your hand like you're playing tennis."

Wow. That sounds fantastic. Because actually holding something in your hand like in real life would...i dunno....mimic real life too much?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:02PM falcomadol said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well, this is exactly what Bill Gates was talking about in one of his comments over the last year about the wiimote. Someone on the lines of "imagine swinging a baseball bat and having it work in game."

Of course, the blogs ridiculed him for it.

I think it's a not-fun idea, but I don't regard the wii as fun either, so maybe it's just a situation where I'm out of step with society again.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Meh, I think the Wii is just fine, but playing tennis by just waving your empty hand around....AND setting up cameras around the room? No.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:57PM Jude said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Cameras made out of vaginas...
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
hax
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 3:58PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fahrenheit 451 anyone?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:04PM falcomadol said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Maybe you live on a farm in Iowa or something, but if you live near a city, I invite you to go for a walk and actually LOOK for cameras. You might be shocked how many you see.

The Dunkin Donuts on the ground floor of the building I used to work in had no fewer than eight cameras in it. Most of which were not watching the customers.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:41PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, I live in Chicago - I dunno if I came off like a country boy by thinking of Farenheit 451, but I agree, there are cameras everywhere here. Daley has been placing a few thousand cameras at intersections all over our city in order to monitor them like they do in London. They call them smart cameras, because they can see that a briefcase has been left in a wierd spot and alert officials. Its creepy.

Anyway, the Farenheit 451 reference was more towards the idea of the living rooms with full wall televisions where people could feel that they were in someone elses lives - and escape their own. (Even us Iowa farm boys have read the book.)
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:08PM Obienator said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For everyone that says this is stupid, just wait.
If a game were able to put me in it totally seamlessly, guess what I will buy it.

I bet Nintendo is already eyeballing this for their next system.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
either Microsoft or Sony would beat them to the punch as they already offer camera based gaming.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I bet Nintendo is already eyeballing this for their next system."

This is why gambling's bad, kids. You make screwball predictions with zero evidence that are in all likelihood false and before you know it you're giving cheap hand-jobs to sleazy businessmen in an alleyway in Bangkok.

Even if this is going to revolutionize gaming (I doubt it), there's no way it's going to be cost-effective by the time Nintendo brings another console to market.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 6:00PM Obienator said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"before you know it you're giving cheap hand-jobs to sleazy businessmen in an alleyway in Bangkok"

Wow, retarded analogies FTL.
All I am saying is "wait and see". No wrong in that.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 6:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
""before you know it you're giving cheap hand-jobs to sleazy businessmen in an alleyway in Bangkok""

Ah, I remember those days...
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 6:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, cliched internet acronyms FTL, my friend.

Joke explanation: Bet = gamble. Gambling on something that won't happen = loss of money. The stereotypical image here is of someone being so down on their luck that they resort to seedy means to make up said money, and since sex is awesome, prostitution is the preferred way to go from there.

I'm not saying it was hilarious (my only Jewish writer is a guild member, so I'm forced to improvise here) but I laughed, and I'm the only audience that matters to me, and it also served to make my point, although you missed it - your prediction sucks.

This technology is probably at least 10 years away, if not twice that or more, depending on how Intel's is imagining it. Ninty's next console is not. It's much closer, and it won't be like this at all. "Wait and see" doesn't make you any less wrong.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:17PM ComicShaman said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Aw, they're thinking too small. I want a Ghost in the Shell future, where I can get a full-body prosthetic and essentially become a video game character in real life. They could set aside volcanic islands for people to have vacations in, with anti-gravity platforms spaced 40 yards apart and robotic pterodactyls to dive-bomb you when you try to cross. If you collect enough floating coins (the new global currency), then you can cover the cost of your vacation! Sweet deal, huh? Unless you spend them all at the Holiday Inn Nanotech bar upgrading your cyber-arm with a rail gun.

Who wouldn't want a future like that? Get to work, Intel, you lazy bastards!
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:38PM ThornedVenom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh well, the future of gaming sucks for the physically handicapped.

But you know what sucks even more in a future like that? NO FUCKING RUMBLE.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2007 4:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
need something to hold on to. need that tactile feedback.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW